Richard Shelby's Speech Analysis

Improved Essays
A. Guns are meant for killing, this is the truest statement ever recorded.B. Gun rights began in 1791 when congress approved the second amendment, which states that “ the right or the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed” (Bowman). For a century the amendment stood free until 1837 when Georgia tried to ban handguns which congress shut down. The time period between 1920 and 1990 the government was very busy regulating and trying to control guns ( Targeted News Service). Starting in 2007 (Bowman) massacre shooting became more and more popular, leading people to want to control guns rather than the people buying them. C.Which raises questions about the second amendment and the state and federal actions. However, many others in …show more content…
Gun laws are ineffective (Shelby), everyone know this, whether they believe it or not is a little different. Richard Shelby, an Alabama senator, makes a senate floor speech opposing a new gun control law. F. Shelby starts off with stating that “ no amount of government intervention can prevent irrational people from doing terrible things” (Shelby). G. Later in his speech he uses the data from a series of nonpartisan studies that show “no correlation between the low expired assault weapons ban and the decrease in crime rates” ( Shelby). In the speech Shelby also points out that Chicago’s murder rates, as of 2013, were incredibly high, but they have some of the most strict gun laws in the country (Shelby). Gun laws aren’t minimizing the number of shootings. In the past few years there have been more school shootings than we have had in the ten years before legislation started passing more gun laws. Shelby also points out that. H. In another document by Franklin Zimring, an American criminologist at Berkeley, he explains that controlling guns is really only affecting law abiding citizens, and not the criminals activists are trying to stop.I. Something people against guns say is that gun laws prevent high risk buyers from buying a gun. J. However, the new stations are showing the exact opposite. As I said before there have been more school and other public shootings in the past couple of years, than almost ever. K. Yet there is still more to say about opposing gun …show more content…
Gun laws don’t only affect our right to own and use guns, they also affect where our money goes. F. In same speech by Richard Shelby to the legislation, the senator points out that all of these background checks, and restrictions are going to cost money, upwards of “ 100 million dollars annually” (Shelby). G. As if to shut down any other possibilities of finding the money,Shelby quickly explains that “ the amendment prohibits the FBI from charging federally funded licensed firearm dealers to run these background checks”(Shelby). H. The government wants to run all of these programs for gun control, and they also need to fund it. Shelby uses this fact to also say that there are “300 million” (Shelby) guns in the United States. When you put all of these facts together it ends up The government wants gun control, it is unconstitutional to charge dealers, and there are at least three million guns in the nation. It all comes down to the government needing to raise taxes. I. A possible argument could be that putting money towards gun control, could save money in hospitals or toward police funding. J. However said so many times in a number of different articles gun laws restrict the law abiding people and not the criminals, so no matter how much money we spend on laws and background checks criminals will still get ahold of guns, and the only difference is that there will be less protection from the police.K.Of course there is more to say about gun control, from both sides of

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Ineffective Gun Control

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Many of the presidential candidates also are trying to prevent them from having firearms due to the amount of incidents that have occurred by the mentally ill. Also, our president is working to try to have a stricter hold on gun rights in order to reduce the amount of tragedies that have transpired. President Obama has considered to use his power to impose background checks for private sales and gun shows. Many people are in favor of that but the National Rifle Association is highly against it. One gun dealer tried to sell a smart gun to help prevent children from accidental shootings but protesters threatened the man 's life and caused him to change his mind. The NRA is the most powerful lobby group in America and five million people belong to the NRA.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Problem Of Gun Control

    • 1330 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The recent mass shootings these past few years has caused a great debate among government officials as well as the public. Most liberal people are trying to pass gun laws that limit what people can and cannot have. They are also trying to enforce mandatory background checks when customers purchase a gun. They are taking away our second amendment rights which we have had since the creation of the bill of rights. We have had this amendment pretty much since we gained independence from Britain.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Policy Of Gun Control

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It sickens me that things have gotten this low, and it seems they are only declining more. That is why I think there should be more gun control laws. If we would have always had more gun control laws, lots of these major acts of violence would not have happened, which were somewhat of a domino effect. I think it is too easy for criminals and the mentally ill to get their hands on a firearm. There is a class you take and a very shallow background check, and then you have a very powerful weapon in your hands.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun Control Act Case Study

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While that may be true, does it not make more sense for civilians to have the right to conceal carry and be there to protect other innocent citizens against those who suffer from mental illness? Both conservatives and liberals agree that these mass shootings that are now happening every year are being caused by people, mostly white males, who suffer from mental illness. According to Democratic Presidential candidate, Hillary Rodham Clinton, “this epidemic of gun violence knows no boundaries. We’re better than this. We need to close the loopholes,” (Haberman,…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why should the government take away people 's guns rights when they use them for self-defense LaPierre and others argue, “that not only gun-carrying individuals ward off attackers, but criminals are deterred because they do not know who does or does not carry a concealed weapon.”(Mantel 9). If criminals are scared that good people are carrying guns also, they will be less likely to commit a crime. If criminals do try and shoot others, there will be good people there to protect themselves with their guns. The streets will be safer and allow society to become better however others believe otherwise. Allowing people to carry guns on the street will increase the crime rate many believe.…

    • 1530 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Gun Control

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the ban still being in place, around 70% of murders were committed with a gun (Agresti & Smith, 2010.). Supporters of gun control also state “The more widely available guns are, the more murders there are” (Lecture notes). These studies have obviously shown that this statement is not true and not a good reason to claim that stricter gun control measures should be endorsed. The laws passed by these cities made it illegal to own a firearm and yet the murders committed by a firearm increased, showing how ineffective they are and also how they did not protect the people in any…

    • 906 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Gun Control Debate

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The laws that have been created in the past and present, people being injured or even killed, and the president not having any response on the debate are some the issues that need answering. Although gun advocates feel their rights as citizens of the United States will be tampered if the government changes gun laws against them, new gun laws will stop gun violence and…

    • 1107 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite the United States wanting to introduce condemning gun policies, by implementing gun control laws, it will not show a decrease in violent crime because it has been proven in other nations around the world as well as in cities with restrictive gun ownership laws and gun bans in the United States. In the United States, 79% of men and 80% of women feel that possessing a firearm makes them feel like they are less likely to become a victim of violent crime (“The Truth About Mass Shootings and Gun Control”). By introducing these restrictive gun control laws, the average law-abiding, American citizen will become vulnerable. Annually 1,500 criminals are killed each year by armed citizens (“How are Guns Being Used by Americans Each Year”).…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pro Gun Control

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    It is 100% impossible to confiscate millions of weapons, but if we could put a few restrictions on purchasing guns, and using guns we could reduce the crime rate by at least half(Nraila.org). Instead of us focusing on gay marriage laws we need to be focusing on gun control and protecting our country. Our biggest enemy is ourselves. We inflict so much crime and violence on ourselves, it is unbelievable. We sell weapons to people who shouldn’t be allowed to posses a weapon.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gun control laws are only going to show effectiveness if they are completely enforced. “Bans often include "grandfather" provisions, allowing ownership of an item if it is acquired before the ban, complicating an assessment of causality” (Hahn). While some gun control laws are effective in reducing gun violence, others seem unnecessary and too restrictive. Law-abiding American citizens should not have their rights taken away because others could not follow the law. “Guns don’t kill people; people kill people” (Gun Control).…

    • 797 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays