Socrates is a philosopher known for his teachings in Athens. He taught his entire life, where no one would bother him. Socrates was accused of corrupting the youth and inventing new gods at the age of seventy. For varies reasons which will be discussed later, the city of Athens chose to wait till this age to prosecute and execute him. Socrates chose to accept his fate instead of escaping to avoid execution.…
Arguably the most influential philosopher to emerge from Ancient Greece, Socrates was widely despised throughout his lifetime for his incessant search to find a man with more wisdom than he. Socrates was subjected to trial on the charges of impiety and corruption of the youth and was ultimately deemed guilty by the jury. Plato recounts Socrates’ lengthy speech of defense and his subsequent sentence to execution in his dialogue, The Apology. Regardless of his innocence or guilt, however, the verdict of Socrates’ execution is the most appropriate outcome of the trial. In his plea for acquittal, Socrates unwittingly proposes a more compelling argument in support of his own execution rather than against it.…
This is one of my favorite quotes from Socrates and I believe that it’s really meaningful. I find this quote very interesting since, there are many ways to find a meaning for it or a way to feel identified with it. The meaning of with quote for me is, when humans do something that they have not done before and they enjoyed or really like it, and they know that they will repeat it again. Human are that way. When you find pleasure doing something you want to do it again, to feel the emotions you felt.…
A man of principle, Socrates stood by his word even when facing death. However, this prideful unyielding arrogance led to his downfall. Though today we regard him as a progressive, his shocking contrarian…
Sevastia Moundros Philospohy 110 DLC Why then: Socrates was an important historical figure as a Greek philosopher, he lived between 470-399 B.C. Socrates was disliked by many people but also had many followers. He had a profound influence on Western philosophy along with his students. He was a huge questioner of everything and everyone. He had a distinct style of teaching, he asked question after question, so his students can come to their own understandings. Socrates was eventually accused of corrupting the youth and sentenced to death by drinking a poisonous cup of hemlock.…
After Socrates finishes his argument that the soul is like the Forms and therefore is immortal, Simmias interrupts and tries to disprove Socrates’ argument. He begins by comparing Socrates’ argument to a harmony in relation to its instrument (85e-86a). Simmias suggests that a harmony is to a soul as a lyre is to the body. He reasons that, if we accept Socrates’ line of argument, the harmony must not only preexist the lyre but also live on after it is destroyed. I find this reasoning to have one true quality but also one false quality.…
Skepticism is basically the idea that, we either do not have any knowledge or that we cannot have knowledge about anything or a particular area. They can say that we do not have the knowledge, or that we cannot acquire knowledge. The difference between them is that the second one has a better claim, but harder to prove. To say we do not have the knowledge, Socrates could have helped that view and think that if we continue to ask questions, we will eventually gain knowledge. They will always try and search for an answer because they believe that they know nothing.…
First, allow us to examine the first premise of Socrates’ argument in favor for a human being’s obligation to follow the laws of the land. The first premise for his argument is that the Laws of the land dictated the regulations that caused our parents to marry and produce us. Plainly stated, we have the Laws to thank for our existence. I do not believe in this accuracy of this premise in Socrates’ argument. I do not agree with the idea that the Laws had any direct effect on my production nor on my parents joining in marriage.…
I thought both Glaucon and Adeimantus had made very strong and serious objections against Socrates about the view of justice being an intrinsic good, but I would argue that their arguments could only apply to certain people and personalities. Glaucon suggests that there are three types of good. The first good Glaucon had explained was intrinsic good which he had described “as a kind of good we welcome, not because we desire what comes from it, but because we welcome it for its own sake-joy” (Plato.357 b). The second type of good that Glaucon had introduced in his argument with Socrates was both intrinsic and extrinsic good which Glaucon had described as a good that “we like for its own sake and also for the sake of what comes from it” an example…
Socrates himself, however, did not believe that to be true. Socrates spent his whole life searching for a man wiser than he was. The only thing he ended discovering was that others who considered themselves wise, really were not. Socrates did not think of himself as wise and knew he was not. Socrates accepted the death penalty for corrupting the minds of the youth with his philosophies.…
Socrates was the main cause of his own death while under trial. In the Athenian system, for this kind of trial, a defendant could suggest his own penalty. Instead of taking this opportunity seriously, Socrates first jokingly said that he should be rewarded instead and put into the same chambers as the Olympians. Obviously, his jurors did not see the humility in this and therefore, passed the death…
The fundamental separation between the religion of the people and the secular did not obtain in Socrates time. Priest were appointed and recognized by the whole city and their job was to interpret the desires of the gods. The basics being that human beings were to fear the gods, sacrifice to them, and honor them with festivals and prayers. The sacred were woven into the everyday life of the Athenians, and they demonstrated their piety by following rituals, ceremonies and sacrifices. Consequently, a religious offence was not just an offence against the gods, but rather against the whole city.…
Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…
Of all the superlatives shone upon civilization and the people therein, not a single one is more fundamentally necessary than leadership, a function that is traditionally suited for certain people deemed to be, in one way or another, exceptional. Of course, Socrates’ particular calculus ennobles philosophers as the rightful leaders, and in so doing, his prescriptions raise the inevitable question: what, precisely, constitutes a proper philosopher? Be it self-referentially, self-reverentially, or both, Socrates’ take herein is perhaps not so much concerned with answerable questions, but questionable answers, not the least of which being what now follows. Socrates’ envisioned world is one that eerily resembles the much-lamented class structure…
Adriana Wright Don Oliveira Greek Project Rough Draft October 05, 2017 So what do you know about Plato, Aristotle and Socrates? Anything? No, well just read this essay and you will find out a lot of different facts!…