Arguments Against Socrates

Improved Essays
Socrates argument

In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying. Socrates was teaching the youth not to believe in the gods that the city was believing in but he told them to believe other god not the one that they grew up believing in.
Meletus is accussing socrate of corrupting the youth. Socrates says that hardly anything his his accussers have said is true and that the facts will prove them wrong. I am convinced by the argument that Socrates is making against his accussers because Socrates is working hard
…show more content…
He believes that for the accusation that meletus has made you don’t take a matter for trial but you advice that person that what he is doing is wrong you don’t just go to courts because when the matter has reached court that means you want punishment. This matter is not subjected to punishment it can be resolved peacefully without anyone facing facing punishment or jail.
If Socrates was corrupting the youth, the youth and their parents should have noticed and reported the matter. If this case was reported by the parents of thr youth that was taught by Socrates it would be strong bt then because it was reported by meletus it is weak. If he wanted this case to be strong he should have collected enough evidence to prove thet the youth was being corrupted, how come doesn’t the parents notice anything about their kids because they are always with them and a stranger notices? maybe they do see that Socrates is doing a good job and there is nothing to worry

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Socrates was not corrupting the youth, but his teachings taught to question everything because you cannot be sure of anything. In the government's eyes, Socrates was starting some kind of movement by changing the way people perceived their lives and the way they perceived the gods. They unjustly accused him of crimes that did not fit the punishment given to him. Socrates’ was a good and wise man, but his teachings contradicted the Athens…

    • 986 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus accuses Socrates of being the kind of person that learns from others instead of giving his own opinion and trying to teach others. Socrates agrees that he learns from others but does not agree that he does not try to teach others. Thrasymachus and Socrates finally agree that if Thrasymachus wins the challenge that Socrates will have to praise him because Socrates does not have money. Thrasymachus gives his definition…

    • 1313 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Will you associate with them, Socrates, and feel no shame when talking with them?” (Crito 53d) He expresses his inner feelings of thinking about fleeing but discarding the option because it will change the way people see him and how they interact with him. Socrates concepts of lawful and unlawful in the Crito seem to have come down to a second stage and the worry of the judgement is more noticeable as we read. The time in jail has given Socrates the chance of overthinking the possibilities and clearly, he has forgotten his words in trial. “I will certainly not stop philosophizing, and I will exhort you and explain this to whomever of you I happen to meet” (Apology 29c). During trial everyone heard how he was determined to continue speaking to “whomever” but never saw Socrates doing this because he never saw resistance as a way of showing…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Cirto brings up the point that leaving his sons without a father is wrong, but Socrates reminds Crito that he would be doing worse by making his sons have a criminal for a father. Also he would be breaking everything Socrates stands for because he would break the social construct that he believed in, and become a hypocrite, by defying what he taught. By repaying evil with evil you are not achieving anything. This depicting how much Socrates focuses on being true to your moral values, and being ethical. Socrates also displayed his ability to question and not be so narrow minded.…

    • 1716 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That if he corrupted the youth then he either does it intentionally or unintentionally, he did not want to be harmed.so this cannot be intentional. Socrates further on went to defend himself in that he believed in a Damon which is a demi- God therefore him not being a complete Antsiest, given that Socrates defended himself against both charges he was still sentenced to…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is where people may have been confused with Socrates which lead to his indictment. Indeed, Socrates claim is true and with the right intentions, it has the potential for an individual to gain wisdom and knowledge. Socrates has gained many slanders and criticisms from the Athenians because he questions authorities and respected business men of Athen to reveal them as ignorant in their expertise. His interrogations destroy the beliefs of those who are being questioned, leaving them frustrated and lost without offering an alternative explanation. Not only does he cause them to question their beliefs, he embarasses them by publicly challenging what the wisdom they think they obtain.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates continues to push and push these people to think about their definition and defend it. They get flustered and upset and give up eventually. The thoughts of profound scholars, writers, and rulers were engrained into the minds of these people so deeply that they could not even defend their arguments because they were not their own thoughts. Thrasymachos gets angry and presses Socrates to try to persuade him to attack instead of defend because that is the only way that Thrasymachos will win. This right here proves that Socrates has actually made a man think, for once in his life, but it isn’t enough.…

    • 1355 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Socrates mostly questions those who allow this act to influence their role as juror as he states, “It is not the purpose of a juryman’s office to give justice as a favor to whoever seems good to him, but to judge according to law, and this he has sworn to do. We should not accustom you to perjure yourselves… This is irreverent conduct for either of us” (35c). In judging based on this sympathy, the jurors are spoiling the word of the law, thus destroying the base which Athens is built upon. Here, Socrates works to educate the crowd on their wrongdoing, explaining the “irreverent conduct” that leads it to be immoral (35c). In doing so, Socrates is able to lead society towards a higher moral law in their awareness of their wrongdoing.…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When people fear the unknown, they are unaware of the information that is present. When people take risks they have the potential to become a negative but also a positive situation, which results into fear because we never know the outcome of situations. In the reading, Apology by Plato, He created this reading because his speech defended what he believed in, which was that he is wiser than all men. This defensive system shows that he knows-that he knows nothing thus producing false wisdom as ignorance. Through Plato’s analysis he sees people who admire his thinking and sees those who are against it, thinking they brought him to trial.…

    • 1200 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He focuses on societies biased and false opinions towards him as well as their preferences for those who have more desirable physical attributes. Socrates explains that those who do not like or agree with him were planted with their opinions from a young age, and there was nobody to defend his character to these people, so those who did the convincing had essentially won their argument by default. This is coupled with his accusation that many people have not even heard Socrates speak, rather they’ve been told of things he has said. These arguments, he believes, should debunk the unpopular opinions towards him as mainly untrue rumors, and is a criticism on societies tendency to form harsh opinions on unfavourable people. The satirical play, The Clouds, by Aristophanes had been popular at the time of the trial and may have been an effect on the perception of Socrates’ practices and character.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays