Comparing Socrates And Skepticism

Decent Essays
Skepticism is basically the idea that, we either do not have any knowledge or that we cannot have knowledge about anything or a particular area. They can say that we do not have the knowledge, or that we cannot acquire knowledge. The difference between them is that the second one has a better claim, but harder to prove. To say we do not have the knowledge, Socrates could have helped that view and think that if we continue to ask questions, we will eventually gain knowledge. They will always try and search for an answer because they believe that they know nothing. The most common opinion among skeptics was that they think knowledge is an impossible thing and think that it will be hard for us to know everything or anything at all. I honestly

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages

    To add onto the political sources of tension in Athens that leaded to the trial and conviction of Socrates, another factor that contributed to the trial was the idea of the oligarchs vs. the democrats which Socrates played a major role in. Socrates was known to be a supporter of oligarchy which is a system of government where only the best few rule and made all the decisions for the polis: oligarchs were however unpopular with the polis because it was quite tyrannical and they were more in favour of democracy. An example of where Socrates presents his favour towards oligarchy is revealed when he questions the jurors using an analogy of horses “Do you believe that those who improve them make up the whole of mankind, and that there is only one…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Five Dialogues & Symposium: Socrates’ Search for Knowledge In Five Dialogues and Symposium by Plato, Socrates the Ancient Greek philosopher challenges his fellow men about the notion that they do not posses knowledge. The role of a philosopher is to reflect on life and ask existential questions because curiosity is innate in all humans. In Apology, Socrates expresses to the jury and judges at his trial, “they have been proved to lay claim to knowledge when they know nothing” (Apology, 23d). Though humans claim to have knowledge, Socrates believes human wisdom is worthless because it is unattainable.…

    • 1528 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Description Of Pyrrhonism

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The dogmatists claimed that they have discovered truth, and thus know and hold truth. Sextus claims that Plato and Aristotle can be labeled as dogmatists. In contrast, the academics negate the dogmatists and claim that truth can never be discovered by humans. According to Sextus, the skeptic continues to investigate, seeking the truth. The skeptic believes that no one has discovered the truth nor that it is impossible to do so.…

    • 841 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Socrates

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates fulfills the will of god by inquiring into the wisdom of people: “God orders me to fulfil the philosopher's mission of searching into myself and other men.” (Plato, 30). Socrates’ accusers hate him because he “[...]went and tried to explain to [them] that [they] thought [themselves] wise, but [were] not really wise” (Plato, 23). Socrates’ three main accusers are Meletus, Anytus, and Lycon.…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Galileo vs. Plato: The Debate to Achieve Neutrality Whether it is democracy, electing officers, or asking the audience on Who Wants to Be a Millionaire, people tend to trust masses. A possible reasoning behind this presumption is: if the majority people think something, then it is probably true or best. While some authors, historians, philosophers, and other such experts agreed with such though, others have attempted to come up with a different solution in finding what is best for society. In Republic by Plato, Socrates attempts to achieve neutrality. Similarly, Galileo intends to reach this same neutrality in The Sidereal Messenger.…

    • 722 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The exchange happens in the little Peloponnesian town of Phlius, home to Echecrates. Echecrates is being gone to by Phaedo, one of Socrates' admirers who was available at his passing. Echecrates has heard the account of Socrates' trial (described in The Apology), yet has additionally heard that there was a long defer between the trial and Socrates' execution. Phaedo brings up that the day preceding the trial of Socrates, the Athenians had wrapped up the boat to Delos. Consistently, the Athenians send a boat to Delos to observe Theseus' triumph over the minotaur to pay tribute to the god Apollo, and amid this time, no detainees might be executed.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Flaws

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages

    According to Claude Levi-Strauss, “The wise man doesn’t give the right answers, he poses the right questions.” Socrates was known mainly for his skill at questioning, which helped him discover the answers to many questions. His paradoxical wisdom made the prominent…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Justification

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Socrates, or the man that Plato wrote him out to be throughout several dialogues, had not believed in the ‘law of retaliation’; he did not consider it to be just to break a law even if the reason for doing so was because he was initially wronged. This reasoning can be disputed by saying that a citizen could have justification for civil disobedience if the law was unjust to begin with. Socrates, taking on the personification as the Laws could reply to this objection by stating that a citizen is free to leave the country if their moral beliefs (moral relativism) disconnect from the laws, but that if they do stay then it is implied that it is imperative that they follow all laws of the land. In my personal viewpoint, this is not a sufficient…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Maddy, What do Philosophers do, lecture 3; section 2 first examines the question that why is it if we fail at meeting the ‘from scratch’ challenge, that it weakens all our ordinary evidence. Maddy goes on to ask why is the ‘from scratch’ challenge to be so dangerous that we should just rule it out. Moore thinks it is because the philosopher doesn’t think of common sense as important while Wittgenstein thinks that skepticism and anti- skepticism are two different languages with their own rules. The Plain Inquirer, Maddy, and Wittgenstein accept the fact that they cannot meet the ‘from scratch’ challenge to rule out skepticism but they still strongly believe that given all the information, experience, and methods given to them about the external world, they have no reason to doubt their beliefs. To sum up, Maddy, and Wittgenstein…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The law did not protect us” writes Coates in “Between the World and Me” pg. 12. Yet Socrates in discussion with Crito States that he is “victim of men, not of law” in pg. 54 of Plato’s “The Trial and Death of Socrates.” The contrast in these two quotes is indeed unfair. We are speaking of two very different historical periods and two very different circumstances but however, I believe it highlights the reality in which people of color live in today.…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Skeptics Inception In Descartes Skepticism he excises the idea of doubt and the never ending allurement to some sort of doubt that is within life. Descartes says that everything you know no matter how probable or improbable it is has doubt. In Descartes meditation one and two he goes over his three main points of doubt. First, he wonders if he may be crazy, secondly if he is dreaming and thirdly if he is being tricked.…

    • 1047 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words what if we confused opinion with knowledge. One example of this is in the past when the church claimed that the Earth was the center of the universe. This geocentric theory was accepted as knowledge because an authority had justified it. Galileo knew that this geocentric model was not true and thus to him, this knowledge was false. However to the general population, Galileo’s theory was heresy and was simply an unjustified belief even though it was in fact true.…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Skeptical Optimist

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages

    When you look at the definitions of skepticism you see words like disbelief and doubt, but you also see descriptors such as questioning, probing, and testing. In education, we frequently see skepticism in context with doubt and often dismiss the positive side of being a skeptic especially…

    • 188 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arguments Against Socrates

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates argument In the apology book Socrates have many accusers. Now he is accused of corrupting the youth but He is denying the allegations he is saying that he could not intentionally corrupt anyone. Some people are convinced that he is speaking the truth but some people thing that he is lying.…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republic, a dialogue written by Plato in the fourth century B.C.E. to propose a series of ideas and theories that he and his master, Socrates, shared. This dialogue was eventually divided into ten individual sections that built off of each other. For example, book one of Republic inquires the question of what is justice, and book two comes back with the question what is more important, justice with the individual and the state. Each part of the dialogue has its own theme and questions; but what are the most important questions? Socrates and Plato love to ask questions and are constantly doing this within the dialogue and in book five Glaucon, Socrates model student, asks three crucial and controversial questions that, at the time, were nearly sacrilege.…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays