Singer's Argument Against Animal Cruelty

Improved Essays
Singer’s argument for lobbying against animal cruelty is highly respected and is used for most scholarly debates. His published book, Animal Liberation: A New Ethics for Our Treatment of Animals, is widely considered within the animal liberation movement to be the founding philosophical statement of its ideas. Many, however, do not agree with Singer’s argument that nonhuman animal suffering should be taken into consideration when compared to human suffering. Their argument is mainly that animals do not have feelings, nor do their lives compare to that of humans. One of their biggest arguments is wildlife refuges, where hunters are allowed to “harvest”, or kill, excess population to prevent overpopulation of animals. Also, with the prevalence

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Famously argued in his novel, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer is a twentieth-century philosopher who “argues that the interests of all sentient beings (i.e, beings who are capable of experiencing pleasure or pain) should be taken into consideration, and not just humans”. For an environmental ethicist, the behaviour of the former members of Elite Farm Services and their blatant disregard for the lives of the obviously sentient chickens would be considered absolutely abhorrent. From this point of view, the dismissal of merely six employees would not be nearly enough to create a more ethically sound situation. While the public’s glaring dissatisfaction shows an auspicious attitude and could potentially incite positive change, the current level of punishment is still inadequate. The way things are now, the core of the issue, the mistreatment of animals, has, and will not be resolved.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Singer has been a long time supporter of the welfare and the call for equality among all animals. In order for Singer to explain to us how he feels about non-human animal equality with humans he brings up the concept of sentience. Sentience is the ability to express happiness and/or pain. That is to say that if an animal is able to experience these emotions then they should be considered to be put on an equal spectrum with the rest of the animals(including humans). To be more specific, Singer separates animals into two "categories" which are "lower" and "higher" animals.…

    • 848 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that it is morally unjustifiable to kill and eat animals for our own pleasure and as food. I personally agree with Singer’s argument that it is wrong to kill other species, using them merely as a means to our end because I firmly believe that their interests in not suffering is parallel to humans interests in not suffering. Animals are sentient beings, meaning that they experience both pain and pleasure as we do. Singer approaches this argument from a Utilitarian perspective, implying a principle of equality. Utilitarianism states that the moral worth of an action depends entirely on its contribution of maximizing the total happiness or pleasure among all people while minimizing the total pain or suffering.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hesse G. Sambaan September 25, 2017 Comp II What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples.…

    • 1053 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “An Animal’s Place,” by Michael Pollan, he contemplates the ethnics of consuming meat. One of the most significant points that Pollan mentions is the idea of moral consideration or the belief “… that everyone’s interest ought to receive equal consideration” (Pollan363). Peter Singer, the author of Animal Liberation, believes that both animals and humans try to avoid pain. If what Singer says is true, that means animals have feelings and lives that matter to them and to deny them moral consideration just because they are a different species is a form of discrimination. Another valuable argument Pollan makes is about animal suffering throughout factory farming before they are butchered.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The controversy over animal rights is one of the most argumentative in ethics and morality. Many people believe animals do not have rights, and that the people who support animal rights are liberals who need to find other outlets for their beliefs. Others feel it is our moral obligation to nurture animals as they cannot speak or act for themselves. Immanuel Kant’s view does not claim that it is permissible to cause pointless animal suffering, but he does insist that we have no obligations to the animals themselves. I will argue that humans do have obligations to the animals themselves.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that all animals are equal and should be treated as so. I disagree with Signer’s argument. In this essay, I will first discuss Singer’s argument and then discuss my reasons for why his argument is wrong. Signer starts his argument by saying that humans are speciesists.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In modern culture, human beings treat animals in ways termed as wrongful if meted out on them. People kill animals for consumption, cage them at will and even use them to conduct numerous experiments (Steinbock 1). Treating animals indifferently is morally incorrect. According to philosopher Peter Singer, no real difference between humans and non-humans justifies animal mistreatment. This is because humans evolved from animals.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Thesis Statement Animals deserve rights, and these rights should annihilate the problems with animal abuse, abandonment, and animal experimentation. Purpose Statement The purpose of this research paper is to discuss animal rights and what animals right activist ideology fight for which includes animal abuse, abandonment, experimentation, and laws that prevent inhuman actions towards animals.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the environment, there is necessary suffering that needs to exist to preserve the biotic community. The land ethicist brings up an important concept of a keystone species which exemplify the need for keeping species even if it involves killing sentient beings. The keystone species life takes priority on the scale of importance this conflicts with animal liberationists again. Peter Singer would put the importance of cognitive ability over how important a being is to the environment. For instance, a human being would be valued higher than an otter.…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Ethics The relationship between humans and animals has always come into question, especially since human beings seat at the top of the food chain. Aided by advanced weapons and technology, humans can subdue or hurt any animal, which has also classified humans as the most dangerous of the animal kingdom. Since before civilization people have killed animals for food and fur or clothing; modern times have seen humans use animals for experiments, for entertainment such as in zoos, and as pets for companionship (Armstrong & Botzler, 2016). Modern times have also seen the emergence of animal rights, advocated by those that see animals as deserving respect from humans.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays