Animal Ethics: Relationship Between Humans And Animals

Good Essays
Animal Ethics
The relationship between humans and animals has always come into question, especially since human beings seat at the top of the food chain. Aided by advanced weapons and technology, humans can subdue or hurt any animal, which has also classified humans as the most dangerous of the animal kingdom. Since before civilization people have killed animals for food and fur or clothing; modern times have seen humans use animals for experiments, for entertainment such as in zoos, and as pets for companionship (Armstrong & Botzler, 2016). Modern times have also seen the emergence of animal rights, advocated by those that see animals as deserving respect from humans. In the same way, animal ethics examines the relationship between humans
…show more content…
In this manner, society determines what rights are and how they apply to people. However, when addressing the relationship between humans and animals, the primary concern is whether to consider animals as beings that can have rights, especially those that are reared by humans (Angelia, 2017). While some schools of thought consider animals to be sentient beings, therefore, they have rights that ought to be respected even by humans, some continue to argue otherwise. If society or the majority determines rights then what happens to animals is left in the hands of people (Angelia, 2017). A specific community may decide that the animals they use for many purposes including food and fur among others do not have rights, which leaves them vulnerable. On the other hand, a community that decides to protect animals rights may choose to define tough measures against those that violate those rights. Without a doubt, this theory is consequential in the sense that it prompts the conversation on animal rights, by asking people to consider animals as beings with feelings. Ultimately, what happens to animals will depend on the beliefs of a specific society since the majority will follow whatever society passes as …show more content…
In this case, a person’s reputation and morals come into play when analyzing their behavior; their action, while out of the ordinary, does not have a bearing on their judgment. Animals ethics calls for the respect of animal rights (bbc.co.uk, 2017); therefore, if one is known to preserve these rights, then he or she may not be judged negatively if they one day, inadvertently or otherwise, end an animal’s life or use it for other purposes. However, one may have a change in their moral standing, and realizing this may be tough since one must amass evidence for people to notice a change in morality. Seemingly, this theory is nonconsequential since it is inapplicable to animal rights; furthermore, it applies to humans’ morality and behavior, which could be

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Many people aren’t willing to acknowledge that animals feel pain and suffer too. Animal welfare was set up to protect animals from any physical harm done by humans such as abuse, experiments, etc. Unlike, animals rights activist, animal welfare activist sometimes support animal testing as long as the animal is cared for, fed, and treated well. On the other hand, rights activist…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They have different views on topics such as the use of animals for scientific use, the use of animals for entertainment, and if animals should be kept as pets. Animal rights believes that humans should not be able to use animals for any purpose no matter how humane or responsible humans are with the use of animals. Animal welfare believes that human use of animals is acceptable as long as humane treatment is given to the animals. Although the two terms do not necessarily support the same cause and do not go about protecting animals in the same way, they both have one thing in common-they are both fighting for what they believe would give animals the best…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Accepting Animal rights will, therefore most likely hinder the process of understanding diseases or how drugs work and therefore will limit or at least severely prolong our ability to cure diseases. Some Animal rights activist groups such as People for Ethical Treatment of Animals argue that there are alternatives…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This controversial topic seems to never end. Should animals have human rights? A supporter of animal rights may say that animals deserve to be treated, as humans whereas a non -supporter may say animals “are irrational and incapable of living in rights” (source). Although both sides of this topic hold evidence and strong points to back up their belief, I truly believe animals should have human rights. Animals deserve rights, and these rights should obliterate animal experimentation, abandonment, and abuse.…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Deontology thus provides a more compelling argument against animal research than utilitarianism. A major proponent of this outlook is Tom Regan, who has written on the subject in The Case for Animal Rights, in which he bases his argument against animal research on the sentience of animals and consequently their right to be respected as individuals. Regan argues that “if individuals have equal inherent value…we are to treat those individuals…in ways that respect their inherent value” (248). Exploiting animals for scientific knowledge therefore infringes upon their rights in that it disrespects their inherent value. One of deontology’s key principles is to treat individuals as ends rather than means.…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Even humans, on a biological level, are animals themselves. With that being stated, the main argument boils down ethics, with each and every person’s morals playing an important part. I, personally, am against animal abuse, so consequently I believe that this issue should be addressed more firmly by people, by the law, and by the world. I, as a pet owner think that animal cruelty is one of the most wicked things in the world. People with good intentions but ultimately neglect and abuse animals, I am more lenient to, because people who fall under this category generally cannot help the situation they are in, or just ignorant on the issue.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For most people there are two scenarios that come to mind when they hear animal testing. The first scenario is that scientist are torturing, neglecting and abusing the animals that are being tested on. The other scenario is that scientist are being ethical, take care of the animals and are creating life-saving medicines. This makes the use of animals in experiments a controversial topic; a topic that isn’t quite black and white when argued. There are different types of animal testing like, medical testing and cosmetic testing; one is more ethical than the other.…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In a child’s case this is a parent or guardian, but for an animal it could be a human decision-maker or lawyer. This creates a specific purpose for granting nonhuman personhood to animals: having an advocate making decisions on their well-being will benefit an animal as an individual. Bruce Friedrich of the “Someone, Not Something” project makes this argument clear saying “we would never grant fewer rights to humans based on level of cognition or complexity of emotion and behavior.” This solidifies Adora’s argument that denying…

    • 1044 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal welfare is how well the animals should be treated. Michael C. Appleby explains animal welfare as, “Ethical concern over the quality of life of animals” (19). If one believes in animal welfare then does one believe in animal rights also? Animals get mistreated in different settings whether circuses, zoos or factories. According to the “Animal Rights Debate” Rich…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays