Hesse G. Sambaan
September 25, 2017
Comp II
What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne
Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples. The audience of her article are the one who care enough about their animal’s happiness. She uses ethos, pathos, and logos to make her argument more accurate.
Vicki Hearne thinks that “happiness is often …show more content…
she thinks that most people think that right advocates are right but taking it too far “when they liberate snails or charge the goldfish at the county fair are suffering”. Animal rights were created to prevent from suffering but they do it in the wrong way. they also use the won of sado-pornograhic sculpture of a tortured monkey that won a prize for compassionate vision. The human organization is a destruction of animals and death is the right to relive their suffering. There’s anti-rabies in England 1880 that dog should wear a muzzle and England still have their law that the animals are require wearing a muzzle for 6 months in the quarantine. The human Society is on the bad shape because they can make an action for the animals to be impounded or do horrific thing for animals if some people will complain about it the animals. Vicki Hearne also stated that Human movement is a history of “miseries, arrest, prosecutions, and death” and that Human Society is a cruel
September 25, 2017
Comp II
What’s wrong with the animal rights by Vicki Hearne
Vicki Hearne thinks that there is more for animal satisfaction for happiness that is the personal achievement. Animals find happiness in their work that they do that you can call “talent”. She believes that animal right advocates got all it wrong, making some of the animals suffer and they are more concern of arguing than the animal’s happiness. The essay was persuasive, she uses her own knowledge as animal trainer and she proves that the only one who can really define the animal’s happiness is the owner. to clarify her own essays, she also uses her own animals, her experienced, and a lot of examples. The audience of her article are the one who care enough about their animal’s happiness. She uses ethos, pathos, and logos to make her argument more accurate.
Vicki Hearne thinks that “happiness is often …show more content…
she thinks that most people think that right advocates are right but taking it too far “when they liberate snails or charge the goldfish at the county fair are suffering”. Animal rights were created to prevent from suffering but they do it in the wrong way. they also use the won of sado-pornograhic sculpture of a tortured monkey that won a prize for compassionate vision. The human organization is a destruction of animals and death is the right to relive their suffering. There’s anti-rabies in England 1880 that dog should wear a muzzle and England still have their law that the animals are require wearing a muzzle for 6 months in the quarantine. The human Society is on the bad shape because they can make an action for the animals to be impounded or do horrific thing for animals if some people will complain about it the animals. Vicki Hearne also stated that Human movement is a history of “miseries, arrest, prosecutions, and death” and that Human Society is a cruel