A Critical Analysis Of An Animal's Place Pollan

Improved Essays
In the article “An Animal’s Place,” by Michael Pollan, he contemplates the ethnics of consuming meat. One of the most significant points that Pollan mentions is the idea of moral consideration or the belief “… that everyone’s interest ought to receive equal consideration” (Pollan363). Peter Singer, the author of Animal Liberation, believes that both animals and humans try to avoid pain. If what Singer says is true, that means animals have feelings and lives that matter to them and to deny them moral consideration just because they are a different species is a form of discrimination. Another valuable argument Pollan makes is about animal suffering throughout factory farming before they are butchered. Pollan states “what’s wrong with animal

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s society, humans have many expectations to live up to, to be considered as a decent human being. But, what’s the point of having all these expectations when most of us fail to live up to them? “What Should a Billionaire Give - and What Should You?” by Peter Singer is a story that discusses the obligations that Billionaires should have when it comes to the people less fortunate than them. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan is a story discussing that the reasons animals are so mistreated today is because we lost everyday contact with them. “Shooting an Elephant” by George Orwell is a story about George debating if he should shoot an escaped elephant or not.…

    • 1730 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Be Non-Violent, Be Vegan! Is the realization of torture, terrorizing and vivisection style mass slaughtering of billions of innocent animals a year for “your” food not enough to make you go vegan? Perhaps it will, when you realize that the killing you continue to support is going to kill you! Animals are “someone” and not “something” that experience joy and pain.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Animal's Place All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal. Equality is one point Pollan shares with his readers, stating that there is not much equality among animals themselves.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘unhappiness’ is meant pain and the lack of pleasure (Mill, 2015, p.5). By reducing animal pain and suffering and treating animals with the same moral equality and respect as humans, Utilitarian is in effect. Comparative Analysis of Utilitarianism and Deontology. Deontology focuses on what is morally right and the duties and obligations that individuals have in car¬rying out actions rather than on the consequences of those actions. Therefore, it would be an ethical obligation to act morally good in those ways that all rational beings would find acceptable.…

    • 1153 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a difficult situation between eating meat and the fact that animals are being killed for their meat. There are some people who both eat meat and at the same time also care about animals, which this can be interpreted as the meat paradox. Many people are fully aware of the conditions animals are being put through just for their meat. Whether or not people realize where meat comes from or the circumstances the animals go through, they still eat meat because it tastes good. Many people do not think about the pain and conditions the animal went through before they put it in their mouths.…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Decriminalization Of Meat

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The use of meat products is both justifiable and extremely argued against. It’s been justified by religious beliefs, health reasons, and just plainly that people like the way that meat taste. However, it has also been shot down by the reasons of animal cruelty, the taking of an animal’s life, and to promote sustainability. The cost of life and the rates of animals cruelty among farms is undeniable and is a growing concern among consumers and non-consumers alike.…

    • 301 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    All Animals are Not Equal Organizations like PETA work towards the betterment of the treatment of animals. In today's society animals are used in many horrific ways such as, food production and and the testing of medicine and other human products. Is this ok? The australian philosopher Peter Singer says it is not. He believes that we should end all use of animals in food production and any forms of testing.…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A lot of controversy and debates surrounds the ethics of eating animals. The most common argument especially for people living in first world countries is that it is not necessary for survival or health. And killing animals just for the preference of the taste only is unjust. They argue that killing animals for food is unethical because there is plenty of non-animal food resources available. In response supporters of meat eating have included various scientific, nutritional, cultural and religious benefits to support their practice.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Close your eyes and picture what your life will be like five years from now. Most people can perceive two or three possible scenarios of their future. For each of us, the same question prompts different visions because we each have personal desires and are unique circumstances surrounding life. This is because the human mind works in such a way that allows us to complexly perceive the past, present, and future situations as compared to our own desires. If someone were able to tell an animal to picture their future, they wouldn’t be able to do so.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays