Basic Principles Of Equality In Peter Singer's All Animals Are Equal

Improved Essays
In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal. Secondly, I will evaluate the justifications that he uses to arrive at such claim. Finally, I will argue that humans …show more content…
While non-human animals devote most of their time to satisfy instinctual needs, humans have the ability to write intricate pieces of literary fiction or thinking about what party candidate best represents their ideology and social needs. Why should we extend the principle of equality to non-human animals if there are a plethora of differences between the humankind and other species? Peter Singer argues that there “is no barrier to the case of extending the basic principle of equality to nonhuman animals” (Singer, 1989, p. 149), for the differences between humans and other animals can be addressed by providing different treatment and rights to the needs of each group. When Singer says that we need to extend the basic principle of equality, he specifies that he will consider this principle to be equality of consideration. What the author means is that we ought not to give greater weight to the interests of one group over

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the article “All Animals Are Equal” by Peter Singer, Slinger expresses how animals and humans should be treated the same. Stinger expresses how humans treat other humans with respect but don’t necessarily treat animals the same way some humans even treat them with cruelty. Animals are very similar to humans, some more than others but we need to treat them with as much respect as we treat any human today. Stinger defines speciesism in this article as a prejudice or attitude of bias in favor of the interests of each other. Basically meaning that humans stand for each other and stand against those members of other species.…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer,the author of “Animal Liberation”, talks about how he thinks animals should be treated and cared for. Singer provides examples on humans experiment on animals and treat them with the mindset of any other pet. Jane Goodall from “Animal Liberation” states that there will always be a communication barrier between animals and humans, making us unsure of what animals really feel. In my opinion, I agree with the author to an extent, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as you would treat anyone else. Moreover, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as any other living thing.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Class notes p.55) The second test is call Principle of Humanity. Kant believed that the world is divided into two categories agents (a person with capacity of autonomy) and things (without capacity of autonomy). Principle of Humanity states that we must always treat a human being as an end, and never as a mere means. (Class notes p.56) First of all, we need to understand the terms “human”, “end”, and “mean”. Human being refers to all biological creature.…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Animal Rights

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages

    One is from philosopher Peter Singer and the other person is Tom Regan. Singer 's view is a utilitarian defense of animals. Signer states that, "we should give the same respect to the lives of non-human animals as we give to the lives of humans, and that all animals, human and non-human, are equal." (Singer, 1974). Tom Regan, is known for his articles on animal rights and similar related issues.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Student Course Date Singer’s Principle of Equal Consideration of Interest In his seminal work, Animal Liberation, Peter Singer, puts forth the principle of equal consideration of interest in which he argues that for any being that possesses interests, those interests must be considered to be correspondingly morally significant with the identical interests of another being. Singer applies this principle to all sentient beings and uses sentience as the crucial characteristic for admissibility into the moral society (Singer 57). Singer’s argument has been challenged numerous times, this one by Francis and Norman. In their argument, Francis and Norman reject Singer’s principle, arguing that humans may give human interests greater consideration than comparable animal interest (Francis and Norman 507). Francis and Norman agree that animal interests deserve some consideration, but they argue that it is ethically correct for humans to give human interests more weight than similar animal interests.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    They think that if a being is capable to suffer, they gain the entry to the moral community. In this view animals and human being (included marginal human being) have the equal right to be part of the moral sphere. It is not new that this two ideologies differ one of another. We must take in account that Kant disagree with other important consequentialist claims. To conclude, this paper had the purpose of discuss, compare and contrast utilitarianism’s and Kant’s respective theories.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer argues that all animals are equal and that it is not right to eat or kill animals. For the reason that animals are capable of feeling pain and pleasure, they matter and we should consider them as equals. I agree with Singers point of view as an utilitarian, we are morally obligated to make more pleasure than pain, we can’t validate killing and eating animals because they taste good. Singer states that not all humans are equal in a factual sense and that we all have different mental capabilities and different sets of morals. Therefore, he concludes that equality is not based on achieving actual equality of all genders and races, but to hold everybody’s interests to the same standard.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Equality should not be based on the ability to think rationally or talk, but on the ability to suffer, which, he points out, the animals that we eat and experiment on are capable of feeling. What makes Singer's argument so sound is how he compares speciesism to racism and sexism. Singer highlights why basing equality on something like one’s capacity for rational thought is in itself irrational because an organism cannot help the way that they were born, and therefore doing so is just as arbitrary as basing equality on the color of someone’s skin, or the gender they were born with. By phrasing it this way, he is providing an easy way for readers to understand his argument because being born with a quality that you cannot change is something many people can relate…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Peter Singer gives out the example of women 's rights and compares it with the arguments of animal rights. He questions if the society accepts the women’s right movement then why can’t the society also let the animals have it too. He says that his point of view is about the cruelty in the human world against the nonhuman world. He wants us all to expand our principles of equality to other living things. He argues that no one can refuse the idea of expanding except for those who are selfish and want to save the privileges of the exploiting group.…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays