Democratic System Of Government

1343 Words 5 Pages
This political study will define the democratic principles of federalism, presidentialism, and parliamentary sovereignty in a comparison and contrast of the governments in the United States and in England. In the United States, the concentration of presidential is a unique part o democratic institutions, which relies on the three branches of government as a balance of power. More so, U.S. president must govern through the federal governing apparatus, which controls his power through the judicial branch and the Congress. In a similar form of Congressional democracy, the British system of governing relies on the parliamentary sovereignty of the legislative body to make governing decisions. However, Britain does not utilize a presidential system …show more content…
The federal government acts as a supreme authority of the land, which formed around the tri-parte system of checks and balances found in the presidency, judiciary, and the Congress. In contrast to the overriding authority of the British parliamentary system, the American government relies on the three branches to make critical decisions as an authority over the states. In comparison, however, Great Britain relies heavily on a legislative body in which decision are made through a federated system of governance. In the U.S., the Congress wields the same type of representational governing authority, which is not dissimilar from the methods used in the party system in British government. These are the territorial divisions of government, which makes Great Britain and the U.S. a type of federalized form of democracy: “Although some dispersal of power across territorial and/or functional units is characteristic of all democracies” (Schmitter and Karl 84). This type of federal system is prominent in the U.S. and in Britain, yet they show variable levels of territorial control based on how decisions are made through a legislative body. Therefore, the issue of accountability in various constituencies defines the role of geographical location in the use of a centralized form of democratic government. Britain and the U.S. share …show more content…
The similarities of federalism and parliamentary sovereignty in the U.S. and Britain are founded on the power of the legislative body to the representational and territorial facts of democratic institutions. More so, the ability of the U.S. federal government as a “checks and balances” system provides a similar use of parliamentary power in the Congress. However, the U.S. relies more heavily on a tri-parte system of legislative government, which allows a certain concentration of war powers through presidentialism. These factors define the overarching power of the American presidency, which makes the president and the Congress accountable for their actions. In a contrasting way, the British parliament does not allow the same powers to the Prime Minister or The Queen as means of accountability in the governing process. In these the principles, it is important to know the similarities and differences of governing democracies, which illustrate the centralization of power as apart of these transatlantic institutions. The United States and Britain share a great many democratic traditions in governing, but they have differing ways in which an authoritarian governance is still evident in the presidentialism and monarchical connections to these institutions. The factors of

Related Documents