Democratic System Of Government

Good Essays
This political study will define the democratic principles of federalism, presidentialism, and parliamentary sovereignty in a comparison and contrast of the governments in the United States and in England. In the United States, the concentration of presidential is a unique part o democratic institutions, which relies on the three branches of government as a balance of power. More so, U.S. president must govern through the federal governing apparatus, which controls his power through the judicial branch and the Congress. In a similar form of Congressional democracy, the British system of governing relies on the parliamentary sovereignty of the legislative body to make governing decisions. However, Britain does not utilize a presidential system …show more content…
The federal government acts as a supreme authority of the land, which formed around the tri-parte system of checks and balances found in the presidency, judiciary, and the Congress. In contrast to the overriding authority of the British parliamentary system, the American government relies on the three branches to make critical decisions as an authority over the states. In comparison, however, Great Britain relies heavily on a legislative body in which decision are made through a federated system of governance. In the U.S., the Congress wields the same type of representational governing authority, which is not dissimilar from the methods used in the party system in British government. These are the territorial divisions of government, which makes Great Britain and the U.S. a type of federalized form of democracy: “Although some dispersal of power across territorial and/or functional units is characteristic of all democracies” (Schmitter and Karl 84). This type of federal system is prominent in the U.S. and in Britain, yet they show variable levels of territorial control based on how decisions are made through a legislative body. Therefore, the issue of accountability in various constituencies defines the role of geographical location in the use of a centralized form of democratic government. Britain and the U.S. share …show more content…
The similarities of federalism and parliamentary sovereignty in the U.S. and Britain are founded on the power of the legislative body to the representational and territorial facts of democratic institutions. More so, the ability of the U.S. federal government as a “checks and balances” system provides a similar use of parliamentary power in the Congress. However, the U.S. relies more heavily on a tri-parte system of legislative government, which allows a certain concentration of war powers through presidentialism. These factors define the overarching power of the American presidency, which makes the president and the Congress accountable for their actions. In a contrasting way, the British parliament does not allow the same powers to the Prime Minister or The Queen as means of accountability in the governing process. In these the principles, it is important to know the similarities and differences of governing democracies, which illustrate the centralization of power as apart of these transatlantic institutions. The United States and Britain share a great many democratic traditions in governing, but they have differing ways in which an authoritarian governance is still evident in the presidentialism and monarchical connections to these institutions. The factors of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Comparison of British and American political system The British and American political systems have both similarities and differences. Most notably, the British political system is a democratic constitutional monarchy, consisting of a monarch and a prime minister. The United States of America however, is a federal republic with a separation of power between three branches. Beyond these two key differences, the two countries have political similarities such as a dual-chamber, two dominating political parties as well as scheduled elections. Firstly, the United States of America has a political system based on federalism, whereas Britain is a constitutional monarchy.…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    On the other hand, an essential aspect concerning the UK constitution is the concept of ministerial responsibility which asserts the fact that the head people in the executive should be members either of the House of Commons or the House of Lords. The UK Parliament is empowered to ‘enact primary legislation, to authorise secondary legislation and to scrutinise the actions of the government, acting as a checks and balances mechanisms’ on it, being the body providing legal power to the executive. Considering the strong relationship between them, the UK executive and legislative ‘are far from being separated’. A strong relevance in this sense has the fact that the Prime Minister could be leader of executive and of majority party in the legislative. In addition, the Parliament can also enforce the Government with the power to draft delegated…

    • 1815 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Systems Of Government

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Also, British Parliament more efficiently voices concerns of the populous. Contrarily, The American system only voices two political parties, but Parliament ranges different beliefs and parties from the Alliance Party all the way to the Liberal Democrats. Nevertheless, the American system possesses a greater safeguard on checks and balances. Specifically, Article 1, Section 6, prohibits a member of Congress from occupying another federal government office. This safeguard puts restraint on any potential abuses of federal power.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This government can be effective and efficient but has numerous vulnerabilities. Johannes stated a question, “would a parliamentary system be preferable to the American presidential system (18)?” However, who can truly say what type of government is prime. Every government is going to possess vulnerabilities. Moreover, I don 't believe that a Parliamentary government will benefit the American government since the American government is based on freedom and the people. A Parliamentary system gives entirely too much power to the leader and America’s government separates the party, however, the president is the leader.…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Prime-minister who represents executive power is appointed by the Crown. However, in reality the leader of the party which won the majority of the seats in the House of Commons becomes the new Prime-minister and he answers to the House of Commons. “In a regime based on the principle of responsible government, the people 's role in the selection of the government is an indirect one” (Course Kit pg.108). In the USA which adopted separation of powers model, citizens vote for both parts of the legislative branch – the Senate and the House of Representatives. They also vote for the head of the government who is the head of the executive branch – the President.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    We can see the differences between the two systems. The U.S. system is based on democracy and the principle of separation of powers, while the Islamic Republic’s Constitution although has democratic features, but primarily based on Islam, thereby providing a multipotent power to the Supreme Leader. The U.S. can not operate without the President but in the Islamic Republic the President has more of a ceremonial role. Because of the differences between the state apparatus, the religion, different foreign policy are have major affect on the relationship of the two countries in the recent…

    • 1982 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Majoritarianism Analysis

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Unlike the government of the United States, which has the executive, judicial, and legislative branches that are given equal power through a system of checks and balances, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom is given more free reign. Of course, the Prime Minister governs in conjunction with the Cabinet, but to reiterate, he is not held to a system of checks and balances comparable to those that govern the United States’ president. This allows for fast action and decision making by a united majority, led by an elected representative, whose legislative group is the top executive authority in the government. Therefore, once elected, the Prime Minister is the individual with most of the governing…

    • 790 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Federalism is considered to be the distribution of power in an organization between a central authority and the constituent units. Implied powers are powers that are needed by the government in order to carry out expressed powers, powers that are directly stated in the Constitution. Implied powers are also powers that are held by the president, and they are not directly stated in the constitution. Inherent powers are needed by a national government because it is a government of a sovereign state within a world community. Last, but not least, concurrent powers are political powers exercised independently by both the federal government and the state…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Crown Prerogatives Essay

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Constitutional monarchy A constitutional monarchy is a system of government in which the monarch is the head of the state. It differs from absolute monarchy in a sense that the monarch does not act as the constitution prescribes rather his or her powers are practiced by other governmental branches on the behalf of the crown. Whereas the absolute monarch is the repository of the whole political system. • Executive…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monarchy Vs Government

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each of these different democratic governments are based on the main ideas of democracy along with government conditions. There are some major differences between monarchy and democracy. Some of the differences are that, democracy is that the government is made by the people and monarchy is a rule by a king, queen, or an emperor. For ‘head’ leadership, democracy is elected by the people, and monarchy is passed down from generation to generation. The laws that are in the government, in democracy the people and the government make the laws, in a monarchy the king makes the law.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays