Canterbury's Case: The Canterbury Vs. Spence Case

Improved Essays
Ever go to the doctor and they tell you that you need surgery, but they don’t tell you the potential risk of having that surgery? Who is at fault here if the doctor fails to tell you the risk and the procedures? Would it be the doctors fault; would it be the patients fault or would it be both? Knowing the risk and procedure is very crucial information. You need to know everything about your procedure. Some people feel like the less they hear about their surgery the more they feel okay about it. If that is your case, make sure you sign the HIPPA form allowing the doctor to tell a family member or friend about your procedure. You do not want for no one to know. What would you do if after the surgery would were at home and something happened, but no one could help you because you did …show more content…
There have been many law suit cases taken out because of the doctor failing to explain what the risk are during and after the surgery. When the risk is not told the patients does not know what to do or how to take care of the surgery, so of course after the surgery something will happen and then the law suit is ordered. That is exactly what happened in the Canterbury vs. Spence case in 1972.
Canterbury age 19 was having sever upper back pain so he went to see Dr. Spence. (Quimbee) Spence who is a neurosurgeon gave Canterbury a myelogram, and discovered Canterbury had a defect in the region of his fourth thoracic vertabra. (Canterbury) Canterbury was scheduled for a back surgery called laminectomy to fix his ruptured disc by Dr. Spence. (Canterbury) (Lawnix) While at the visit in the doctor’s office Dr. Spence failed to mention what the risk and procedures were for the back surgery. There are only two acceptations to where a doctor does not have to go over risk and procedures with a patient and that is when the patients is unconscious and when helping becomes more harming then helping, the second is where informing the risk to the patient poses a threat to the patients

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    I suspect the doctor was under the impression they were only authorized to treat the right should injury because this is a separate claim. Based on my review of the medical records, I do not see any specific documentation of the August 1, 2016 incident. However, a complaint of the back pain was documented throughout the report but not significantly. I note there is a report dated October 7, 2016 which briefly mentions a fall and forceful rotation, which I believe is describing the August 1, 2016 date of…

    • 1891 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1998, Hugh Caperton filed a lawsuit against A.T. Massey Coal Co., Inc and was found liable for $50 million in damages in a state trial court in West Virginia. Prior to the hearing, Caperton motioned for the presiding justice in the case, Brent Benjamin, to recuse himself, seeing as though Massey’s C.E.O. had donated nearly $3 million dollars to Benjamin’s campaign. In 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled that Benjamin’s failure to recuse himself, seeing as he had a personal connection to one of the parties in the case, was a direct violation of the Due Process Clause stated in the fourth teeth amendment (CAPERTON v. A.T. MASSEY COAL CO., INC.). The Caperton v. Massey case proposed the question, “how much power and impact does election campaigning have on judicial bias. Should state judges be appointed over elected?”…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Robert versus Boston- Robert v. Boston challenged the separation of schools based on the color of their skin (nps.com). In 1848, a year old girl named Sarah Roberts was stopped from going to that school because she was black. Her dad Benjamin pressed charges against the city. The lawsuit was a effort by the black community to end segregated schools.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Phr209 Discussion 1

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discussion One Brenda Doering PHR209 Andrea Chan Part 1: Chapter 10 discusses the mechanism of drug interaction and contributing factors. Read Chapter 10 and in your own words explain why surgical patients and patients hospitalized for infections are considered high risk for drug-drug and/or drug-food interactions. Part 2: Next, find an article in a medical journal or on a drug information website that involves one or more patients experiencing a severe drug interaction. Discuss how the article or research affects patient risk associated with drug-drug and/or drug-food interactions.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    One of the hallmarks of Stephen Harper’s tenure as Prime Minister was the adversarial relationship between Parliament and the courts. His government was “openly hostile towards the judicial branch” and often failed to take its Charter duties seriously. Harper’s lack of deference for the right and freedoms entrenched in the Charter led to several of his government’s laws being struck down by the Supreme Court of Canada. Conversely, the appeal of Frank v. Canada was a victory for the Conservative government – although the impugned legislation had been enacted over a decade before Harper became Prime Minister. It is still possible for the challenged sections of the Canada Elections Act to be declared unconstitutional, however, as the case is being appealed in the SCC.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The case of Rothmans, Benson & Hedges Inc. v. Saskatchewan, 2005 SCC 13, [2005] 1S.C.R. 188 is considered very controversial as it questions the national public health concern that is caused by the smoke of tobacco and can affect our youth in a negative way. What this cases focuses on is s. 6 of the Saskatchewan Tobacco Control act and how by the virtue of the paramountcy doctrine is inoperative due to the fact of s. 30 of the federal tobacco Act. The doctrine of paramountcy establishes that where there is a conflict between valid provincial and the federal law or its purpose, the federal law will prevail. Furthermore, s. 30 of the federal tobacco act allows retail stores to display tobacco and tobacco product-related brand elements and post…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Orr V. Bell Case Summary

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Exceptional care and professional responsibility is a standard form of practice the general public rely upon for their health care needs. But, what happens when codes of conduct, rules and codes of ethics are violated and physicians fail to provide adequate care and diagnostics? When circumstance like this arise, who becomes responsible for the negligence on behalf of the patient? In the case of Orr vs. Bell, due to the negligence on behalf of Dr. Bell, the patient Orr went misdiagnosed and eventually became paralyzed. The review of this case will document and prove due to Dr. Bell’s failure to follow nationally recognized Radiologic ethics and rules Dr. Bell failed to determine Orr’s medical issue and therefore was responsible for the outcome…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Negligence or Malpractice? The burden of proof lies with the plaintiff. I have spent the last ten years as a paralegal and dealing with all kinds of cases. During those ten years, we represented plaintiffs and defendants.…

    • 604 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The plaintiff was still capable of doing most things, the impact of the badly done surgery was not shown to the fullest extent. The next verdict I found out about was the rent case, the verdict was also for plaintiff.…

    • 979 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    There are three court cases that this writer finds the most important in regards to NEPA, these are: Cliff’s v. AEC, Sierra Club v. Morton, and Hanley v. Kleindienst. The first case analyzed, Cliff’s v. AEC, covers an agencies’ obligation to obey NEPA to the “fullest extent possible”. The second case Sierra Club v. Morton, covers “standing”. The third case, Hanley v. Kleindienst, covers defining the word “significance’’. All these cases cover impactful aspects of NEPA that need to be studied and scrutinized to ensure future cases are well prepared A) Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee, Inc. v. Atomic Energy commission (AEC) 449 F. 2d 1109 (D.C. Cir. 1971) cert.…

    • 1243 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    III. Current Law The use of license plates as compelled speech became an issue in 1977 with the case of Wooley v. Maynard. The Supreme Court of the United States set precedent that the State of New Hampshire could not force its citizens to display the state motto, “Life Free or Die,” on their license plate, if the motto goes against their religious or moral beliefs.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The operation turned out be out of the blue complex, and wound up with an incontinent and deadened patient. The claim asserted a deficient exposure of the dangers of surgery. In recognizing that there was no point of reference in American law for supporting a case taking into account an insufficient revelation of dangers and choices, the court held: "The normal patient has next to zero comprehension of the restorative expressions, and conventionally has just his doctor to whom he can search for illumination with which to achieve a savvy choice. From these practically proverbial contemplations springs the need, and thus the necessity, of a sensible exposure by doctor to patient to settle on such a choice conceivable. " Canterbury versus Spence was chosen in 1972 and introduced the present day period of educated assent.…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Medical Malpractice Theory

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages

    For example, in Wright's study, they found that for every 100 patients, there is one patient that files a claim when they suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). A similar study conducted by The California Medical Association found even better results as one in every 125 patients suffer from medical malpractice (Wright, 2011). This is impressive as the law profession receives upwards to six claims of negligence per a 100 clients (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). The problem here and why these researches are relevant to this study's research question is that despite the low number of medical malpractice claims, there is actually a large amount of medical malpractice that exists; a notion supported by 30 years’ worth of empirical research (Kritzer & Vidmar, 2015). A potential cause for these low claims is that it is hard to establish medical negligence as the claimant would need to prove before the judges, causation beyond a reasonable doubt, the highest standard of proof in law (Hartwell, 2005).…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In addition to knowing and understanding your rights as a patient, and knowing and understanding the Health Insurance Portability Act or HIPAA, it is also important to understand your role in healthcare. As a patient you have to be an active partner in your health care. This meaning that you cannot expect to receive the care you want unless you talk to your health care team. In order to receive proper care you must talk to your health care team. They cannot read minds, and are unable to understand what is going on unless you talk to them.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Lifeboat Dilemma There were several issues involving ethics in The Queen v. Dudley and Stephens case. The case facts are subject to a major ethical issue involving whether it is ethical to kill a man to save three. Some would argue that when given a situation where at least one person will die, we should try to save as many human lives as possible. Others should state that the value of human life is immeasurable. Who are we to decide if one life is equal to another?…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays