Kline case was based out of Pennsylvania with the plaintiffs being five severely disabled children against Caryl Kline1. On the side of the plaintiffs were their parents to speak for them and argue for their rights, under the Education for all Handicapped Children Act1. They argued that their child/children, and children like them, lost the skills they acquired over the school year during summer break1. Basically, they would come back to school and start in the same exact spot they did a year prior1. The parents wanted school and/or services to be made available to their children year round, so, they could make and maintain their progress1.…
In the case of the State of New Hampshire v. Sondra Murray, Ms. Murray was charged with disorderly conduct, resisting arrest, and possession of marijuana. She was convicted of the disorderly conduct which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 644:2, and possession of marijuana, which violated N.H. Rev. Stat. Ann.…
Briggs v. R.W Elliott - South Carolina: In 1951, in Clarendon County, South Carolina, twenty courageous African-American parents filed a lawsuit against school officials, for their own children received unequal education services compared to the all-white schools. In South Carolina, young African-American children had to walk far distances to attend schools. Some students even had to walk an eight-mile distance to school. They were not allowed to travel on school-provided transportation such as normal school buses!…
Relief Sought: Petitioner filed suit against the Western Line Consolidated School District seeking reinstatement because the nonrenewal of her contract violated her First and Fourteenth Amendments. Issues: Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School District addressed a teacher’s right to free speech under the First and Fourteenth Amendments. Facts: Bessie Givhan, a teacher in Mississippi’s Western Line Consolidated School, went into the principal’s office and expressed her opinion concerning the school’s hiring practices and policies. She believed that the practices were racially prejudiced, and after expressing her opinions, the principal claimed that the teacher made unreasonable and hostile demands. After the school year, her teaching contract was not renewed.…
They claimed that schools that were segregated were not equal and never could be made equal. The court combined six…
Dissenting Opinion This case will help introduce “another progressive time of tolerance in this cultivated by the legal that I wish, consequently, completely to renounce any reason on my part to hold that the Federal Constitution propels the instructors, folks, and chose school authorities to surrender control of the American government funded educational system to state funded school student.” (Justice Hugo Black) Educational…
The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) argued the school’s adopted plan was too gradual. When they filed the suit, the federal judge stated the school board was acting in “good faith,” therefore the suit was…
The Supreme Court ruled that a school…
Lauren Garcia Professor Hinrichs KIN 550 15 May 2018 Assignment 1 The first case I looked at was TENNESSEE SECONDARY SCHOOL ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION, PETITIONER v. BRENTWOOD ACADEMY. The underlying issue here is a high school football coach sent out a letter to eighth grade boys, violating TSSAA’s rule for prohibiting coaches from using undue influence while recruiting middle school athletes. This lawsuit became vital in sports law because it was the first time the Supreme Court had to make a decision regarding which entities are bound by the First Amendment. Brentwood sued the TSSAA claiming they were violating the schools first and 14th amendment rights.…
The District Court ruled in favor of Amy, and the Court of Appeals affirmed their decision; therefore, the school district appealed the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court in 1982. Case Summary…
It was the case Bolling v. Sharpe. This happened in the District of Columbia and while a group of parents were the ones that were concerned with the conditions of the schools that their children were attending they went to court because the equal protection clause applied only to state laws, segregated schools where mandated by federal law in the district of Columbia. The second special circumstance of this case was that they did not give any evidence of the separate but equal clause and did not even mention it for their defense plan. They said that the clause itself was unconstitutional even if the schools that their children attended were equal to a facility that a white child went to.…
Board of Education case happened in 1955, when schools in Topeka, Kansas were getting segregated by race. A child and her sisters always had to walk across a dangerous railroad to get to their all black school even though there was an all white school much closer to their house without dangers of a railroad. The family (Brown's) decided to take the case to court because they believed it violated the Fourteenth Amendment. They went to both federal and Supreme Court, but found what they were looking for in Supreme. This case is very similar to Plessy v. Ferguson case and because of this the case got challenged.…
Brown v Board of Education: Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas was a landmark case of the United States’ Supreme Court. It was the combination of five “…cases from four states and the District of Columbia…that reached the Supreme Court in 1952” (Give Me Liberty! 953) that challenged the controversial “separate but equal” policy regarding segregated facilities that resulted from the Plessy v. Ferguson case in 1896. In this case, the plaintiffs targeted the outstanding differences between schools for white children and those for black, who often “…attended classes in buildings with no running water or indoor toilets and were not provided with busses to transport them to classes” (Give Me Liberty! 953). When the cases made their way…
Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…
HIB stands for harassment, intimidation, and bullying, including cyber-bullying. These actions have become serious and escalating problems in our schools and sadly, have led to suicide of our youth. To confront this problem, the Anti-Bullying Act was created to clarify standards on how to “prevent, report, investigate, and respond to incidents of HIB,” (Anti- Act, 2010, p. 1) Schools are now collecting data which is monitored and reported to the State. The Superintendent reports data to the BOE and community twice a year and schools and districts are given a grade which is posted on their website homepages with a link to the report.…