Same Sex Marriage Legislation

Improved Essays
Same-sex marriages has been an acceptable practice since 2001 when Netherlands and although not very well known it has been an accepted practice in a few U.S. states as early as 1975 when a Boulder, Colorado clerk issued a marriage license to a same-sex couple (Lahey & Anderson, 2004). It is a well-known and accepted fact that marriage for centuries have been defined as being between a man and a woman; however, over the years same-sex couples have fought diligently to receive the same legal recognition through marriage. It has been most unfortunate that legislation has been introduced to prevent this from happening. Most state introduced constitutional legislation that precluded same-sex couples from being able to exercise that right of marriage. Legislation such as the Defense of Marriage Act.
Hagai & Crosby (2016) posits that the endless campaign prior to the US Supreme Court justices voted in favor to strike down the laws of states that prevented same-sex couples from marrying. Liberalism was at the center of the vote to afford same-sex couples the right to marry. Those in consent were simply sending the message that marriage is a basic human
…show more content…
Department of Public Health) became the first U.S state to issue marriage license to same-sex couples. Before the US Supreme Court had ruled in favor of same-sex marriages in 2015 they have voted against same-sex marriages Constitutional protection in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. The move by Massachusetts spearheaded a fresh drive by same-sex advocate and opposing conservative advocates that waged a fresh new campaign for and against same-sex marriages; however, by the end of 2004 multiple states had written constitutional bans against same-sex marriages. The case was largely heard by the US Supreme Court to rule on if same-sex couples were being deprived of their Fifth Amendment right of due process and equal protection (Hull,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Plessy V. Ferguson Summary

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. What is the name of the case? Hollingsworth v. Perry a) What is the name held by the petitioner in this case? Summarize the petitioner’s key argument. Dennis Hollingsworth et al. with Charles J. Cooper speaking for the petitioners.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For these couples, their natural rights were being revoked and “thrown away.” Riot after riot changes sadly weren’t being made and same-sex couples were still being discriminated against. However after further investigation, the supreme was able to see that this negligence was a direct violation of the constitution. After June 26, 2015 the Supreme Court ruled by a 5-to-4 vote that the Constitution guarantees a right to same-sex marriage. This day is a true testament to the ideas and concepts created by the enlightenment thinkers.…

    • 1261 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Earlier this year, the Supreme Court in the case Obergefell v. Hodges, the court heard a case in which the plaintiffs argued that a ban on same sex marriage violated certain provisions of the 14th Amendment. The plaintiffs specifically argued that the ban violated the concept of protection of liberty. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that same-sex marriage is legal across all 50 states because they view marriage as a union of two people and not solely as a union of a man and a woman. Although it was a 5-4 decision in the Supreme Court, the majority opinion stated that the 14th Amendment was being violated. The dissenting opinion on the other hand, focussed on several ideas.…

    • 1275 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The right to marry might seem trivial to some, but for those who have never been able too, it is an amazing feeling. Although not everyone feels so positively about it, those individuals are not in great company at least that is what the research suggests. That is not to say that these individuals and entities are not causing problems for those trying to enjoy the right. The most notable are the clerks in Kentucky refusing to issue licenses and the courts in Arkansas upholding poor legislation to attack homosexual couples. Overall, this case decision has set the stage for equal protection and treatment for the LGBT…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of what defines a marriage has highly been disputed over the past century. In 1996, the U.S. government passed the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), which defined marriage as the union of one woman and one man, and allowed states to ignore same-sex marriages granted in other states. This federal law stood until June 26, 2015 with the case Obergefell v. Hodges, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 stating that no state can deny a same-sex couple the right to marriage. The court’s official opinion states,”[t]he right of same-sex couples to marry is part of the liberty promised by the Fourteenth Amendment [and] is fundamental under the Due Process Clause.” Why did it take nearly twenty years for the court to synthesize the current…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice Kennedy held that the Due Process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees marriage as a fundamental right for everyone. The dissenting opinion was delivered by Chief Justice Roberts, in which stated that although same sex marriage may be a fair and good policy, but the Constitution does not address the issue and because of that, it is not the court’s place to decide upon the issue. This decision was monumental for the LGBTQ community and has been celebrated since. Couples that have been together for years were finally legally married, which is true of many people throughout the country. This basic right was finally able to be given to those in the LGBTQ…

    • 2294 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-Sex Marriage in New York "Who would give a law to lovers? Love is unto itself a higher law" ("Boethius"), a quote stated by a Roman philosopher Anicius Manlius Severinus Boëthius in 524 (Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius - Biography). Obviously, laws have nothing to do to interfere the love in theory; however, as the discrimination that homosexual people receive for a long period, people in New York has to fight for their equal right to have the law and live under the protection of it. Just like Boethius states, it is ironic that love have to be approved. No body could judge love; ridiculously, almost everybody gives discrimination to unusual love.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Court ruled with a majority of 5 to 4 that was in favor of the petitioners. The majority decision was decided by Justice Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Breyer, Kagan and finally Kenndey, who delivered the Court’s opinion. The majority started by touching upon the evolution of the institution of marriage over time, but socially and legally, and that there were states who were divided on the issue of same-sex marriage. The liberties that were protected by the Due Process Clause which was “nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law”, protected choices that were at the core of a person’s freedom and worth (Obergefell et al. v. Hodges).…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    History Of Dual Federalism

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court argued that prohibiting same-sex marriage was a violation of the Bill of Rights, therefore, it was unconstitutional. That decision required the states to comply with the ruling and changed their constitutions to allow same-sex marriages, even if they did not approved the ruling…

    • 1288 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Same-sex couple had proven to be as a stable and equal as opposite-sex couples and the state was not legitimately protecting the morality of society by putting one group down at a lower level when it came to rights, recognition, and protection. The Obergefell case restored the definition of equality to be generally applied that now meant the recognition of same-sex couples under the federal law. Although at the time of ratification the controversy did not involve the dispute of whether same-sex couples would be protected under this amendment, this case shows the continuation of the disagreement in what equality entails. These cases clarified that the constitution was not only color-blind but also blind to sexual…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The court practiced the use of the supremacy clause by over riding states laws and establishing a law for all the land of gay marriage being legal. No matter what laws states had prior to this regarding marriage became irrelevant because of this new law from the Supreme Court. Gay marriage has always been extremely controversial in the United States. Everyone seems to have a view on it that stems from their religion or personal…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sexual orientation and inequality Name Institution affiliation Sexual orientation and inequality Until recently same-sex marriage was illegal in the United States. People were arrested for being illegal for violating sodomy laws. The laws were finally outlawed in the year 2003 by the Texas court after a 6-3 was passed.…

    • 1620 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Perspective On Marriage

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Perspective Paper Perspective, it is a way of viewing something; a point of view. Many have their own way of viewing events or certain topics. Some views tend to clash and lead to arguments, debates, trials and the production of articles. Popular topics, which will be discussed, show how perspectives clash. These topics are Gun Control and gay marriage.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But, the one thing that holds them back is the law. Many states in the U.S banned homosexual marriage due to the fact that marriage between man and woman has been around for the past millennia. Lots of people thinks that same-sex marriage is one of the reasons that and that it supposedly wrecks the balance between traditional marriage and the balance between man and woman that’s supposed to equally balance the differences and family to create a brand- new creation to create man and woman as one. Phooey. People don’t know who is able to enforce marriage.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception. Yale Law Journal. May 1997, v.106, n7, 1965-2008 Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. 1997.…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays