Hagai & Crosby (2016) posits that the endless campaign prior to the US Supreme Court justices voted in favor to strike down the laws of states that prevented same-sex couples from marrying. Liberalism was at the center of the vote to afford same-sex couples the right to marry. Those in consent were simply sending the message that marriage is a basic human …show more content…
Department of Public Health) became the first U.S state to issue marriage license to same-sex couples. Before the US Supreme Court had ruled in favor of same-sex marriages in 2015 they have voted against same-sex marriages Constitutional protection in the case of Bowers v. Hardwick. The move by Massachusetts spearheaded a fresh drive by same-sex advocate and opposing conservative advocates that waged a fresh new campaign for and against same-sex marriages; however, by the end of 2004 multiple states had written constitutional bans against same-sex marriages. The case was largely heard by the US Supreme Court to rule on if same-sex couples were being deprived of their Fifth Amendment right of due process and equal protection (Hull,