Should The Supreme Court's Decision To Legalize Gay Marriage In The United States

Improved Essays
When the founding fathers wrote the Constitution to establish a solid government for the newly formed United States there was no way they could have predicted how much the country would grow and change. The laws and rights they included in the constitution were for there time but they also made the smart decision and leaving some of it up for interpretation and also leeway. The debate over The Supreme Court’s decision to legalize gay marriage in the United States today relates to the debate over making the supremacy clause apart the Constitution of the United States in the 1700s for the reasons of both taking away power from the states and giving that power to the federal government, both override state constitutions, and gave the minorities rights.
(slavery)
After finally breaking away from the power of Britain and becoming free states the last thing the people of the United States wanted was another strong federal government. This strong government was the exact reason that they broke away from Britain. The people of the United States wanted the exact opposite of this and received that through the Articles of Confederation. The problem with the articles was that now the states had too much power and the federal government had none. People like James Madison saw the need for the change of this and began constructing the Constitution. The people were
…show more content…
The court practiced the use of the supremacy clause by over riding states laws and establishing a law for all the land of gay marriage being legal. No matter what laws states had prior to this regarding marriage became irrelevant because of this new law from the Supreme Court. Gay marriage has always been extremely controversial in the United States. Everyone seems to have a view on it that stems from their religion or personal

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The articles of confederation was the Untied States first attempt at creating a democratic government. Meaning instead of giving power to the central government they decided to divide it up with different states. But it all wasn't good, congress had trouble passing laws due to the fact that 9 of the 13 states had to agree before any laws could be passed (Doc 1). Congress did not have the power to collect the taxes needed to pay for the expense of the national government (Doc 2). Also the states refused to give the national government enough power to work correctly.…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    After the battle of the 13 colonies and a successful independence from the British monarchy, the Articles of Confederation became the great experiment to achieve freedom to all citizens of America. Establishing the first constitution was a call against monarchy or any privileged aristocrats who were looking for total dominance. Nevertheless, as every first experiment, the Articles of Confederation had critical defects such as a deficiency of central government to help or defend the well-being of its citizens. Monarchy was one of greatest fears to the early independent colonies. As a result, the Articles of Confederation created a constitution that was made to prevent the central government from tyrannical views thus give the power to the…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the formation of the U.S. government, two different forms of government were initiated. At first, the Americans wanted to form a government that was nothing like monarchy, as they didn’t want a repeat of King George. The Articles of Confederation served as the first constitution of the United States, which was ratified in 1781. However, the Articles of Confederation had issues. The main issue was that the national government was too weak.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the United States declared Independence from England in 1776, many ideas, plans and compromises were made to create a system of government. The Articles of Confederation was one of the first ideas that established the functions of the national government. Shays Rebellion helped government officials realize that there needed to be improvements and plans created to stabilize the nation. Finally, agreements like the Connecticut Compromise and the three-fifths compromise allowed views from all states to be shared and come together.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    14th Amendment Dbq

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In his dissenting opinion, he argued, “When the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868, every State limited marriage to one man and one woman, and no one doubted the constitutionality of doing so” (Obergefell v. Hodges). Essentially, Scalia claims that because it wasn’t unconstitutional at the time the fourteenth amendment was ratified, then it shouldn’t be unconstitutional now. However, homosexuality wasn’t nearly as openly talked about then as it is today. Many homosexuals would have been shunned from society if people knew about their sexuality; some would even be put to death. Because our culture has changed so drastically over time, the way we are governed…

    • 972 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Obergefell vs Hodges June 26, 2015. The United States Supreme Court finalized the case known as Obergefell vs Hodges. The case involved a decades long battle between states and people on weather or not gay marriage should be legalized. Same-sex couples, and other advocates of same-sex marriage sued their state marriage agencies in Ohio, Michigan, Kentucky, and Tennessee on weather or not their right to refuse same-sex marriage was violating the 14th Amendment, which addresses many parts of the right of US Citizens. [ Obergefell v. Hodges.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles established the basic functions of national government in America after its newfound independence from Britain. The Articles were not strong enough to prevent conflict in the states, Shays’ Rebellion, so states wanted more power (Doc G). Americans called for change in the Articles, so delegates from all the states met at the Constitutional Convention and instead of just making minor changes to the Articles, wrote the Constitution. The government was stronger after the Constitution, but Americans still argued about whether they liked it or not, Federalist versus Anti-Federalists (Doc I). Citizens also asked for a Bill of Rights…

    • 576 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation marked the death of the 13 Colonies and the birth of the United States of America, a country of it’s own after fighting with a superpower for so long. After being controlled and constrained by Britain for centuries, the now-Americans were afraid of the government becoming a second Britain. The new American government drafted the Articles of Confederation in 1777, the first law of their new country, and to avoid creating another restrictive government, the Articles were extremely limited federally and failed to provide a strong government in terms of economics, law enforcement, and government. These issues can be shown by just a few of the restraints on the federal government: the inability to print national currency,…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1787 the weak form of government brought together by the Articles of Confederation was not doing its justice for the colonists. In the Article of Confederation, there was only one branch of government, and that one branch had no power over the states. This soon proved itself to be ineffective to be a national government for the people. To remedy this problem the Founding Fathers got together at the Philadelphia Convention to discuss a new plan for the government. The Founding Fathers decided not to revise the Articles of Confederation, but to create a completely new constitution.…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Obergefell v. Hodges case lasted around 6 years. The petitioner was James Obergefell, et al. and Richard Hodges, Director of the Ohio Department of Health, et al. This case took place in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. The deciding court was Roberts Court in the years of 2010 and 2016.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At first, under the Articles of Confederation, the leaders wanted a government based on popular sovereignty, which was by the people-for the people. Because these leaders had just come out of such tight control under the rule of Great Britain, the states didn’t want to give the government too much power. This gave the majority of the power to the states. However, the political leaders soon realized that individual state governments weren’t working and decided to change the rule of the government once more. Now the country shifted to a strong central government with a bicameral legislature of a congress with the Senate and the House of Representatives.…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Under United States constitution, the democratic system should decide for gay marriage law. In Chief Justice Roberts’s dissenting opinion, he has delineated the supreme court’s position for gay marriage law. Therefore, he insisted that states government should reserve their states’ power for the gay marriage law. Due to the belief of social policy and fairness, many same-sex couples had appeal for the nationwide same-sex marriage legal approval. Unfortunately, they are bewildered on United States law system, the supreme court actually does not have the legal power to make gay marriage law but legislators and people.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This time period saw many states ban gay marriage in their constitution during the late 90’s. Many studies were published and as the studies and celebrities began to come out, society 's idea of what being gay meant. Being gay is not a disease, something to hide, or even something to shame. Being gay is being attracted to the same sex; that 's it. There still has been much backlash between various religious groups ,but as a secular society where religion should not have any influence in what a government decides.…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is made evident in the Baehr v. Miike case in 1993 where the Hawaiian Supreme Court ruled that the restriction of marriage whether heterosexual or homosexual was unconstitutional. They found that the refusal of marriage licenses discriminatory. Though in response to that ruling and the huge denial people had of same sex marriages at the time in the United States, “The Defense of Marriage Act “ was created. In 1996 the act made it so that marriage was defined as a union between a man and woman. The act…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The hot topic I will be summarizing is the same-sex marriage. This video talks about two lawyers that once went against each other in the case of Bush v. Al Gore. Now there teaming up together to get same-sex marriage approved. This issue was brought up when California had passed the same-sex marriage bill. Certain people were not happy with it and sadly proposition 8 was formed.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays