S Corp Distributions V. Compensation Essay

2230 Words Dec 1st, 2014 9 Pages
S corporations are required to annually file Form 1120S, U.S. Income Tax Return for an S Corporation, although they generally are not subject to federal income taxes. Instead, an S corporation passes its profits and net losses to the shareholders, who are required to report the items on their individual income tax returns. This distribution of the flow-through income, deductions, and other items are reported to the shareholder and the Internal Revenue Service on Form 1120S Schedule K-1, Shareholder’s Share of Income, Deductions, Credits, etc.
S corporation is one of the fastest growing types of business entities and the most common type of corporate entity filing returns with the IRS. It also offers several attractive
…show more content…
This has not stopped the IRS, however, from contesting attempts by S corporation shareholder-employees to minimize compensation in favor of distributions. In Revenue Ruling 74-44, IRS first challenged the payment of reasonable salaries to an S corporation that paid dividends but no compensation to shareholders who provided services to the corporation. Since then, there have been more than two dozen reasonable compensation cases that have come through the Tax Court and the taxpayer has not fared well. In most of them, the sole or majority shareholder of a corporation provides substantial services to the corporation, but shuns salary in favor of distributions. The IRS challenges the treatment and re-characterizes all the distribution as compensation, holding the taxpayer liable for payroll taxes. The Tax Court applies the employment tax statute, holds the shareholder to be an employee, and agrees that the entire distribution should be taxed as compensation. In more recent years, cases have been against S corporations in which the shareholder-employee has taken some compensation. This has forced the Court to make a determination whether the amount was reasonable or if distributions made throughout the year should be re-characterized as salary and be subject to payroll taxes. In one such defining case, Jeffrey Dahl was the sole

Related Documents