'Rhetorical Analysis Of Animal Liberation' By Peter Singer

Improved Essays
Peter Singer,the author of “Animal Liberation”, talks about how he thinks animals should be treated and cared for. Singer provides examples on humans experiment on animals and treat them with the mindset of any other pet. Jane Goodall from “Animal Liberation” states that there will always be a communication barrier between animals and humans, making us unsure of what animals really feel. In my opinion, I agree with the author to an extent, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as you would treat anyone else. Moreover, animals should be treated with the same moral respect as any other living thing. Moral equality is distinct from factual equality. Singer states, "Otherwise it would be nonsense to talk to the equality of human …show more content…
Goodall also states that when coming to the realization that animals have the same right as we do to inhabit the earth, but there is a big communication barrier between us. This barrier might prevent humans to further understand what steps humans need to take in order to understand animal suffrage. Additionally, there are some exceptions for treatment of all living things. People will discuss that even the smallest insect should also receive the same treatment. I think moral treatments of any living thing should just be left to what the people and our brains think is morally right or wrong. It is often argued that we treat animals morally wrong by testing chemicals on them to make sure it’s safe for human use. In order for our species to thrive and expand our knowledge we would need to test certain chemicals on animals because they are disposable. Sure humans are also disposable both since we are barely reaching the pinnacle of basic human right, I doubt people want to be volunteering other people to have experiment done on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    As discussed previously, animal testing for medical use is ethical because it furthers human knowledge and safety, whereas using animals for cosmetics is unethical because it doesn’t further our knowledge just tests what we already know. Numerous cosmetic companies test on animals because they want to add untested ingredients that aren’t necessary to add into their products ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing"). These ingredients aren 't necessary to use because there are already pre-tested and safe ingredients that can be used instead, so there doesn’t have to be testing on animals. Cruelty-free companies use the already many safe ingredients available in their products, so they do not test on animals ("About Cosmetics Animal Testing”). If these companies do feel the need to test their products they turn to other alternatives of testing before using animals (Keville).…

    • 1560 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Animals don’t deserve to be tested or harm in anyway because they didn’t do anything. Animals should have at least some rights so we can improve how animals are abused, tested, and disrespected by humans. Would you want your pet to be taken away for testing? Would you want to watch the brutality of it? If not, then why let another animal go through this.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Argument For Animal Rights

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I do not fully believe that animal rights are completely equivalent to human rights, but I hold true to the fact that animals have the right to be treated humanely because animals do have basic senses and emotions. Regan does mention that animals can feel pain and suffering, and I do agree with his view on that. So, what would be the consequences of giving animals rights? The major consequence that I see about giving animals rights is that farm factories would have to be monitored more closely to ensure that animals are being treated fairly and humanely. This means that no animal will be subjected to unnecessary pain and suffering.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But does animal testing fulfill that purpose? I am thankful for animal testing but the cons outweigh the pros. Some cons to animal testing include how its inhumane, which I agree with, and cruel. There are alternatives methods for animal testing now, so why should we keep using the lives of animals to benefit ours? If we can use glass testing, then why would we continue to risk animals to lives to save our own?…

    • 1828 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, utilitarian’s say humans should either become vegetarian or treat the animals as humans before killing them (Rachels, 2015). If this were to be practiced then it would be acceptable and justified to eat animal meat. But, as long as humans continue to mistreat animals before killing or experimenting on them, utilitarian’s will not condone this. Utilitarian’s require humans to treat the animals like human’s and if they fail to do this then we should not use them to experiment on or to kill and eat. This is a positive aspect to the theory because we take animals for granted.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethics In Animal Testing

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Ethics on the Morality of Animal Research In this paper I will discuss the wrongness of animal testing based on the falsification of the biological account of moral status. All sentient creatures, no matter what their biology, matter morally. Animals used in research labs for testing are sentient, therefore they have moral status. In Cohen’s paper, he describes the testing of animals for human benefit to be morally permissible because they do not have human membership (Cohen, p. 94) However, the more important relevance here is that humans and animals are more similar than stated, and that animals can feel pain and pleasure just as humans do. Cohen explains that the important differences in humans and animate life are the morally relevant…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Act Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is propose that way because of the symbolic meaning we put ourselves in with other species. We assume we are the alphas and the other animals as lower than us, regarding to the portrayal, we consume them because we are in control. The issues are exactly the same from the approach that activists oppose to why it stabilize us as a society. The movement is characterized as a social movement by the collective action it has gathered from the abolitionists and welfarism activists to change the treatment towards animals or none in captivity. People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The source can be used to help those understand the terms and laws regarding animal rights and animal welfare. Summarize: The main topic of this source is that animals with higher levels of intelligence should have rights. Wise and the team of wise are trying to accomplish their goal of getting awareness of animal cruelty and animals rights to choose, in the aspect that they should have the right to live freely. Wise’s argument focuses on four chimpanzees used for entertainment purposes. He believes these animals shouldn’t be owned and should be freed to a sanctuary.…

    • 1540 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animals do their best to please us and occasionally they fail but we as humans do not always succeed in things either so what is so different about animals not being able to constantly please us. We should be treating all living things, from humans to animals to plants, the same way that we should treat anything with respect. Animals deserve our respect, they do so much for us and they should be praised for the good things they do. As a reward, they should not be tested on and they should be given the same treatment as other human beings. The reason animals are believed to be so different from us is because they are thought to lack Factor X.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This body solely focuses on animal welfare and its rights. This study also explores aspects of human welfare since it is critical in explaining the aspect of animal ethics. This body was formed in order to create regulations in relation to the manner in which animals should be used for teaching and scientific experiments (Dolan 14). Human beings have disregarded the emotions and wellbeing of animals when they are using them for experiments. Common issues such as using animals without injecting any anesthetic medicine are also addressed by this body.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays