The case that animal suffering should be given equal consideration to that of human suffering is a claim Peter Singer makes and that I disagree with, instead arguing that human suffering should be more highly considered to that of animals.
Exposition- 310 words Peter Singer in his argument claims that human suffering and animal suffering should be treated in the same manner, putting the lives of other animals in the same categories as those of humans. This argument begins by talking about how humans should be considered in the same group as animals, this is all due by part that we are all members of the animal kingdom, living in the same world, breathing the same air, and occupying the same space. The rights should be universally equal amongst all species. …show more content…
We can limit the amount of radical humans to a handful of individuals who have made the world a bad place at certain moments, these are the dictators, the world leaders and the terrorist who thought of ways to destroy the world. Unfortunately, most can only think of this being an isolated human issue, but there are cases within species of different animals, there have been cases of cannibalism and attacks amongst the same species. The humans have done wrong but it doesn’t mean that they didn’t do right afterwards. The invention of the nuclear bomb made a path for the invention of nuclear energy, a supply of energy that may be the future for the way the planet is saved. The humans have done a lot in order to make the world a better lace, and in the question of which species of animal should be given a higher consideration when it comes to suffering and life itself, it should be the human, because without the human, the world would full of environmental issues and animals would have to truly fight for
Exposition- 310 words Peter Singer in his argument claims that human suffering and animal suffering should be treated in the same manner, putting the lives of other animals in the same categories as those of humans. This argument begins by talking about how humans should be considered in the same group as animals, this is all due by part that we are all members of the animal kingdom, living in the same world, breathing the same air, and occupying the same space. The rights should be universally equal amongst all species. …show more content…
We can limit the amount of radical humans to a handful of individuals who have made the world a bad place at certain moments, these are the dictators, the world leaders and the terrorist who thought of ways to destroy the world. Unfortunately, most can only think of this being an isolated human issue, but there are cases within species of different animals, there have been cases of cannibalism and attacks amongst the same species. The humans have done wrong but it doesn’t mean that they didn’t do right afterwards. The invention of the nuclear bomb made a path for the invention of nuclear energy, a supply of energy that may be the future for the way the planet is saved. The humans have done a lot in order to make the world a better lace, and in the question of which species of animal should be given a higher consideration when it comes to suffering and life itself, it should be the human, because without the human, the world would full of environmental issues and animals would have to truly fight for