Explain Why It Is Wrong To Mistreat Animals

Good Essays
It is wrong to mistreat animals because mistreating animals is like mistreating another human being. Animals feel pain the same way humans feel pain. They are living beings and bleed like humans bleed. This alone isn’t what distinguishes animals from having or not having rights. Animals do have rights to a certain extent. Animals have the right not be mistreated and used by humans.
Indirect duty means that we don’t have direct duties to animals, but we do have duties about animals. So torturing an animal is wrong because it harms the animal not because it upsets other humans. Direct duty means that we have a direct duty to not be harmful, but kind to animals. Doing kind acts aren’t guaranteed to be morally right because you can still be kind but cruel at the same time in a way. For
…show more content…
It is mainly the farm animals, lab rats and other animals in this category that are being treated cruelly. Some of the other animals’ people are a little more sentimental towards which isn’t fair to the ones being tested on. This is why you see lab experiments being test on these certain animals rather than all. They all should have the same respect from humans because they’ve done nothing wrong to us. Contractarianism isn’t a great way to determine if animals have rights or not. We have some direct duties to animals because they are to be treated fairly and also acting as a n indirect duty is not entirely true for animals.
An objection would be Animals have inherent value, just not as much as human. But even saying this means that you would have to agree that animals have rights to a certain extent. Animals don’t have the intelligence and thought process as human beings which easily distinguish them. In conclusion animals should have rights to a certain extent to where they aren’t being lab experiments resulting in torture and them feeling

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    So instead of using the term “animal rights,” people should use the term “animal welfare.” Animals don’t have the same rights or even close to the same rights as us humans. Animal welfare states that we know that animals may be used for certain purposes but shouldn’t be mistreated or abused. Some people say that animals behave selfishly, and only look out for themselves and their own interests. Since animals don’t behave morally they don’t deserve to be treated morally by human beings. If we want animals to have rights like us humans then that means we can’t breed or kill them for…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hence, there is no reason why humans shouldn 't tolerate lesser intelligence in animals. Singer explains that although both groups cannot be treated the same because of their significant differences, humans should aim to meet the needs and interests of animals. They ought to take into account the effect their actions have on animals. For instance, no animal can tolerate torment. This is because animals ' feel pain just like humans.…

    • 1134 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Richard L. Cupp is under the impression, “nonhuman animal species are incapable of significant moral responsibilities,” (1). Therefore, animals should be no more than property and behavior change has to come within the abuser. Morals are knowing what is right and wrong. He believes animals do not possess this so being property is sufficient. Humans have responsibilities to animals.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    People with good intentions but ultimately neglect and abuse animals, I am more lenient to, because people who fall under this category generally cannot help the situation they are in, or just ignorant on the issue. Others, in contrast I find especially hostile because the other group of people abuse or neglect animals claiming to punish it, and in some cases out of spitefulness, often because of the sadistic nature of that person. Animals are living breathing creatures that inhabit this earth just as we do. Yes we may be superior to them in many ways, but that gives us no right to treat them like they are trash, like they don’t feel pain or sadness, like they are not trying to live a decent life. Most cases about animal abuse tend to go unnoticed, I feel that people should address the issue with more seriousness because animals are always going to be apart of our lives.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Therefore, the act of using them as test subjects is not justifiable by any means, especially because humans and animals do not have similar bodies, and some diseases such as HIV-AIDS do not attack animals. Hence, testing for such diseases’ drugs on animals may not offer conclusive results. Moreover, use of animal tests greatly infringes animal rights, because just like humans, animals also have their rights. Additionally, such tests greatly inflict a lot of pain and suffering to these animals, because some of the tests run on them are quite painful and in most cases deadly. Therefore, animals should be treated with consideration and care and not as test…

    • 958 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    As sentient beings have a natural interest in not suffering. So moral consideration does not depend on who can reason morally but in whom can suffer. Morality is a matter of the interests of sensitive beings, and therefore it is unfair to exclude non-human animals. Animals have moral value and deserve thoughtfulness because they can experience pain. According to utilitarianism, the welfare of each must count.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Some claim it is better to use animals as testing subjects rather than humans. However, that is one of the main areas that they are misguided in. While yes, it is good if humans can stop others from being used as test subjects, using animals as testing subjects does not help humans. Instead, there is another possibility that helps both humans and animals, and none of them have to receive pain. Despite that, since using other methods of testing can be a little more complex, many companies do not want to execute it, sticking to the old fashioned way.…

    • 1293 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    I will argue that humans do have obligations to the animals themselves. Kant believed that autonomy was extremely valuable, but in order to have it one must have free will, which requires having self-consciousness and the capacity to be guided by reason. But animals, according to Kant, are not autonomous. Therefore, the Categorical Imperative does not apply to them. Animals may lack “decision-making capacity” in the robust human sense that they can’t explicitly tell us “I…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sentience is defined by the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as ‘feeling or sensation distinguished from perception and thought’. Animal rights advocates often describe sentience as the ability to suffer. Sentience is important in animal rights because it is the main determinant for whether a being has interests and rights. If a being is not sentient, it cannot suffer and does not have rights. Beings have rights to prevent society and individuals from causing undue suffering to each other, but without sentience, an object such as a table or a lamp is not injured by unfair or unjust treatment.…

    • 2293 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animals do their best to please us and occasionally they fail but we as humans do not always succeed in things either so what is so different about animals not being able to constantly please us. We should be treating all living things, from humans to animals to plants, the same way that we should treat anything with respect. Animals deserve our respect, they do so much for us and they should be praised for the good things they do. As a reward, they should not be tested on and they should be given the same treatment as other human beings. The reason animals are believed to be so different from us is because they are thought to lack Factor X.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays