Rhetorical Analysis Of All Animals Are Equal

Decent Essays
Peter Singer in the article “All Animals are Equal,” defends the opinion that non-human animals must be respected as the lives of humans. He argues that all animals are equals. Singer claims equality is the base on same consideration, is a moral idea, and the capacity to suffer is a prerequisite for rights.
To demonstrate that equality is based on equal consideration, Peter argues ideas to not extend the rights to non humans are inconsistent. He believes that equality does not mean equal rights. The idea of this is showing that dogs do not know what voting means, so, they do not have that right. For example, it is does not follow that a man and woman will have equal rights, because the claim that man has the right to an abortion is as

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ought animals have rights, or ought they fall under the category of being morally considerable? I argue that there is no single framework in which to address the moral treatment of animals. A careful blend of these two ideas, moral rights and…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Summary of “Sustainabilitarianism and Eating Beef” This case study deals with the contents of Chapter one {animal welfarism} in the text Environmental Ethics for Canadians edited by Dr. Byron Williston. In this case study, Williston forces readers to think critically about the meat-economy that exists and if it can be justified, morally and sustainably. Peter Singer, A crucial thinker in the realm of Animal Welfarism, claims that “grounding claim of intrinsic value based on any set of special properties is a form of speciesism” (29). In his article titled All Animals are Equal, Singer debates the way we treat animals during their life span while in these “industrial feedlots” (49) is unjust.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to understand Peter Singer's article "All Animals Are Equal", one has to look at his viewpoint and perspective. Singer is viable, which is somebody who trusts that best result is something that causes that most prominent measure of joy (or minimal measure of pain) for the best number of individuals. Nevertheless, in this definition the word individuals means just people. This is the point that Singer is attempting to contend. Is to state that animals do not feel agony or expertise happiness.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The author’s main purpose about defending the rights of the animals is that they are living creatures. His strong claim determines that researchers are finding animals are more like humans than we ever realized. However, defying by Rifkin’s statement’s and the reason he points out the connection is because us people have not really payed attention to be able to realize the similarity. Animals pass on learning or skills to their young ones which goes the same exact way with humans, most likely why many children look up to or choose to follow their parents footsteps.…

    • 539 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “This is a beautiful example of the reality that conscious, awake and aware humans have always been here.” (Gardner) Mark Twain has placed everything very straight forward and clear way about what humans do to other humans. I think the major idea in this piece was telling people how these so-called lower animals can leave together when they are totally different species, but humans being the same species can not leave together or to help each other out just for the sake of doing it. Mark Twain uses a lot of rhetorical situations to compare humans to lower animals.…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is no doubting the fact that animals do not have rights in the conventional sense, or in any other sense for that matter. The reason is because they are not moral agents; they cannot do things out of a sense of right or wrong and cannot reason, as opposed to humans. Without reasoning, they are unable to have rights and therefore, are not responsible. Does that mean humans have the right to treat animals badly? Of course not; but that is for humans to decide, because animals cannot decide anything.…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In his essay, “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals,” Peter Singer argues that the standard for having a right to get equal consideration as others is the species’ “capacity for suffering and enjoyment” (205), and therefore, a species which satisfies the standard should be protected from speciesism. Speciesism is “a prejudice or attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species” (204). Singer states that many people’s voices arguing that intelligence cannot justify racism and sexism bring speciesism towards animals into…

    • 93 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The animal rights movement declares that animals have the same right to life and protection from suffering, as well as any other creature that can feel pain. Doctor of Philosophy, Tom Regan, justifies animal rights from the standpoint of logic. In his article “The Radical Egalitarian Case for Animal Rights”, the author takes a firm stance on this issue and claims that almost all human relationships with animals have the exploitative nature. At the same time, animals have the right to meet the needs and the implementation of their natural purposes. Tom Regan 's argument can be formulated as follows non-human animals have an equal right to respect and treatment for them, which means that hurting them or using as a raw material or a kind of resource…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "There was nothing there now except a single Commandment. It ran: ALL ANIMALS ARE EQUAL BUT SOME ANIMALS ARE MORE EQUAL THAN OTHERS” - (Orwell 134) This quote means that all animals aren't equal because you can’t have something more equal that equal. This is napoleon tricking the animals by twisting language to make this sound intelligent. The animal who read this was Benjamin he read it to Clover because she can’t read and her eyesight is going bad.…

    • 223 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    An Animal's Place All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal. Equality is one point Pollan shares with his readers, stating that there is not much equality among animals themselves.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In All Animals Are Equal, the philosopher Peter Singer argues that we should extend the basic principle of equality to non-human animals. In order to justify this claim, the author examines the foundations of the basic principle of equality, establishing a moral system that takes into account the equal consideration of interests of living beings. Peter Singer states that in order for a being to have interests at all, one must take into account the capacity of suffering and enjoyment, or in other words, sentience. Throughout this chapter, Singer makes his readers see that if one rejects racism and sexism, one must also reject the idea of giving special consideration to the interests of one species over another one. In this essay, I will firstly reconstruct the arguments used by Singer to arrive at the conclusion that all animals are equal.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Proctor argues that since humans and animals both have the ability to feel positive and negative emotions, they both deserve the respect and the right to not be treated cruelly. Marian Stamp Dawkins expands on the idea that animals deserve to be treated without cruelty in “The Science of Animal Suffering.” Dawkins addresses humanity’s moral obligation to treat animals with dignity and explains how humans can accomplish this different relationship with animals. Robert Garner’s article, “In Defence of Animal Sentience: A Critique of Cochrane’s Liberty Thesis,” furthers the debate on animal rights to include not only the right to not suffer, but also include the right to not be used in any circumstance. Animal rights may only be fully achieved once humans recognize animals’ dignity as living beings.…

    • 2019 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal’s Capabilities In Bonnie Steinbock’s “Speciesism and the Idea of Equality” she provides arguments against those of Peter Singers in his article “All Animals are Equal.” Steinbock argues that non-human animals should have specifics rights. She didn’t go as far as saying that they should have the right to vote or marry, but the right to be recognized as coherent beings just as capable of suffering and feeling as we are. The way that I see it, Steinbock provides some valid points but fails to acknowledge the quantity of animals in our world, and that there are some animals that we don’t care if they suffer.…

    • 830 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    'Some Animals Are More Equal Than Others '. Philosophy 53.206 (1978): 507. Web. 29 November 2015. Hursthouse, Rosalind.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays