Rene Descartes 'The Wax Argument'

Improved Essays
Rationalism is a way of getting to the truth using only the logic of our minds, not including sensory input.

The major strength of Rationalism is its universality. If I can think something is true, you can too! The lack of interest Rationalism has in sensory input is definitely a weakness. There are senses such as taste that cannot be proved by logic alone.

Rene Descartes had a theory about wax and rationalism, called The Wax Argument. Descartes suggests that when we see, touch, or smell wax in its solid form we all call it wax, however, when that wax is melted it has changed completely but we still call it wax, the logic of which has been thought through and not sensed, if we had just sensed the new properties of the wax we most likely would

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    1. I am convinced by Descartes’ argument that the self is the most certain of objects. Because his logic and reasoning are good and well augmented, and he also gives the example of the wax experiment. The wax experiment shows that our senses don’t know anything and only the intellect knows the physical things. We know more about the mind than anything we know through the senses.…

    • 212 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1) Rene Descartes a) Rene Descartes believes that things exist simply because he thinks, therefore he is. This is beautifully illustrated when he gives us the wax example. Before giving that example, Rene Descartes did state that our senses are deceptive and so is our imagination. If we were to go by that, does that mean we exist just because we perceive it through our senses?…

    • 1993 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There were three characters in the conversation and one person explained the conclusion on the each characters’ role. Mimi as the Puritan, Barathi as the Thomas Paine, Ain as the Benjamin Franklin , and Jessie concluded. Character: A Crazy Attitude Puritan Women The demon were possessed someone.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The final skeptical argument that Descartes offers is the argument from God’s omnipotent power (Class notes, Week 1). This argument is different from the first two arguments because it is calling into question God’s omnipotent power to deceive us into believing what is true is actually false. Descartes arrives to this argument because after the dream argument he admits that though he maybe dreaming, there are things in that world that remain consistent whether the senses were fooled or not. Those things are principles such as, algebra, geometry and arithmetic. He suggests that whether he is awake or sleep, two plus three will equal five.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Rational Comprehensive Theory – is a pubic policy in which the decision-makers explore all possible alternatives to address the public policy problem. The objective is that the benefit outweighs the cost. For example, Affordable Care Act that develops a model approach to provide a universal health care plan to accommodate U. S. citizens who normally wouldn’t have health care. The Incremental Theory – is a public policy that is a continuation of previous policy with minimum changes.…

    • 181 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I will argue the current literature by Shaun Nichols provides supports sentimentalism. That is, psychopaths do suffer from emotional responsiveness. Alternatively, Jeanette Kennett provides response to Shaun Nichols argument. First, I will define what empirical rationalism. Empirical rationalism is a view our conscience mind developed the ability to reason, and as a result, human moral judgment acquired similar in way, logic and mathematics acquire.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    René Descartes’s argument in the Second Meditation of Meditations on First Philosophy, normally referred to as the Cogito, after its Latin formulation cogito ergo sum (‘I think, therefore I am’), is arguably the most famous one in all of philosophy and can be considered as origin of modern philosophy. His premise ‘I am, I exist’ (p.21) , which he ambitiously sets out to prove in this Meditation, does not explicitly take this form though. His meditation is thinking about thinking and affirming that thinking equals being. This essay will present and analyse Descartes’s argument in detail and explain that one can be sure that the ‘I’ exists and what the ‘I’ is. Then, it will examine how one comes to know the true nature of an object.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Discussion and the Conclusion: In Meditation II, Descartes introduces the “Wax Analogy” in order to demonstrate conclusively that things are known through the intellect rather than the senses and that the mind is better known than the body. Specifically, the argument is concerned with how we know rather than what we know. The argument concentrates on transformation— that is, a piece of wax melting into liquid wax. Descartes states that our senses allow us to know about a piece of wax: its colour, taste, smell, size, shape, and solidity. When the wax is placed near a fire, it melts; thus, its properties change as well.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Max Weber’s key concept was rationalization. This refers to the eradication of mystery and emotion from everyday life and their replacement by rational calculation and control. This essay will discuss Weber’s contribution towards sociology in terms of rationalization and his attribution to ‘The Protestant Ethic’. It will introduce Weber’s key approaches, such as social theory, rationalization in regards to modern society, bureaucracy, the ideal type and a contemporary example of rationalization. Furthermore, capitalism will be discussed, in order to depict Weber’s theories in comparison to Marx’s.…

    • 2122 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rene Descartes the father of modern philosophy, a philosopher known to believe things to be true until it was proven otherwise. In these meditations Descartes had complex opinions. In the case of Descartes in meditations a greater individual than him existed. Descartes’ claim insisted with the existence of the idea of God to the real existence of God. To support his argumentative opinions, Descartes points two distinct arguments that were utilized by “Augustine in the fourth century and Thomas Aquinas in the thirteenth century” (Shouler).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    John Locke's Argument Against Innate Ideas

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    This is the belief that it is not possible for there to be ideas in the mind that one is not aware of. Rationalists argued that once children grew up and developed mentally, they would be able to understand the innate ideas. For Locke, the idea that they have to be able to reason to understand and ideas that are supposed to be innate shows and strengthens his argument. This would, however, have to be based on the notion that innate ideas were conscious ideas. On the other hand, if these ideas are gained after reasoning or in conjunction with reasoning, they are not in fact innate fore if they were, such ideas would include mathematics.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ideas are defined as whatever is perceived or understood about something; despite this simple denotation, humankind 's capacity to acquire and understand these complex thoughts remains a controversy in philosophical literature. As major role models in the foundation of modern philosophy, Descartes and Locke feud over the definition of these ideas, the acquisition of these concepts, and the content of these thoughts. Descartes identifies with a rationalistic view where knowledge is based on innate ideas and these ideas are acquired through reason, whereas Locke believes in empirical explanations which state that ideas are formulated from sensory experiences with the outside world. In many of Descartes’ works, he emphasizes the importance of…

    • 1575 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Meditation 6, we learn that Descartes comes to the conclusion that the mind and body are two separate entities. His belief is that through the idea that mind and body are separate entities, without the other, one can still exist. He comes to this conclusion by arguing that the mind, a non-extended thinking thing, is an entirely different being than the body, an extended thinking thing, is. He believes that the mind and soul are united to the body but still can be separated from each other and still exist.…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Philosophy 001 Project 3: Descartes 1) Cartesian dualism refers to the philosophical view proposed by the French mathematician and philosopher Rene Descartes that describes and explains the relationship of the mind and body. According to this philosophical view, the Mind and the Body are two completely separate and different substances capable of interacting with one another. Descartes asserted that “[that is, [the] mind, by which I am what I am], is entirely and truly distinct from [the] body, and may exist without it.” (Descartes). Descartes described the mind as an immaterial substance whose “essence consists only in being a thinking thing [or a substance whose whole essence or nature is merely thinking]” (Descartes).…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    René Descartes first builds up his position in Meditations on First Philosophy by starting with pushing aside all that we know and learned as it was based on the empiricist thinking, that our beliefs are to be based on our sense experience, which is the perceived foundation of how everyone thinks. This way of thinking, according to Descartes, should be abandon as it is a defective way to do so when learning. Even thinking by numbers and figures are not a good foundation when gaining knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations, so he takes through his thoughts so that we come to same conclusion as him on why the methodological doubt should be used to better our understanding of the world. The beliefs we currently have are invalid since our senses…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays