Dual or multiple relationships transpire when professionals undertake two or more roles at the same time or consecutively with a client (NAADAC, 2009). …show more content…
Addiction professionals must support the permissible and putative ethical codes which relate to professional behavior (Herring, 2015). It is obligatory upon addiction professionals to hold a working familiarity of the federal and state decrees and guidelines pertinent to their practice and discipline. Addiction professionals should be aware of all federal laws and laws of the member’s individual state overriding the practice of alcoholism and drug abuse therapy (Herring, 2015).
Obedience is the observation of regulations and principles which oversee individuals and the vocation; addiction professionals relate this principle by following licensure and endorsement protocols, agency programs, and permissible directives. Licensure decrees stipulate the forms of doings that the chemical dependency professional may execute (NAADAC, 2009). Clinicians should have a profound consciousness of their areas of proficiency and an appreciation of their precincts (ACA, 2005). Education is a precarious constituent; the counselor must identify the need for continuing education as a module of professional …show more content…
Some definitions are verbalized by decree, individual belief schemes, faith or a combination of all of these (Roberts, 2008). Professionals are encouraged to select and regularly relate an ethical resolution making ideal in every problematic circumstance that ascend so that they can dependably validate the intent to act in an ethical and skillfully accountable method (Truscott & Crook, 2004).
When faced with an ethical dilemma there are several methods that can be applied; NAADAC has identified several steps to utilize in order to resolve ethical issues. Clinicians must first identify and define the problem so that they are able to further review the NAADAC code of ethics; this will allow them to determine which principle is appropriate (NAADAC, 2009). The clinician will then consider the possible permissible apprehensions and recognize in consultation with legal advocacy, if needed (NAADAC, 20049). Once all of the courses of actions have been considered, the clinician will then decide on plan of action and implement the chosen plan with the appropriate documentation (NAADAC,