(2006) The purpose of this study is to evaluate the regularity of acceptance in different relationships and regulate the change that occurs between couples. To view and assess these factors, several types of couples are critically evaluated. This included same-sex couples, couples married with children, without children, dating couples, and cohabitating pairs. (Christensen and Doss 290, 2006) To conduct such research, the researchers lead a longitudinal study with a method that is referred to as the Frequency and Acceptability of Partner Behaviour Inventory method, and self-determination theory. Along side online surveys and interviews, this method sanctions comparisons between the different categorical groups of couple’s satisfaction, in terms of positive or negative acceptance factors. These factors included such examples of acceptance, closeness, violation and demand. This method is predominantly drawn out with questions that lure out conclusions and discover correlations between groups. (Christensen and Doss 290, 2006) This study’s results progressed around troubled and wholesome couples, emphasizing differences in acceptance and change between the groups, as acceptance is used as a tool to understanding one another and identify areas that are or are not functioning. The research shows that relationships and behaviour do change when acceptance is involved and introduced into the bond. (Christensen and Doss 289, 2006). As mentioned before, the man seeking advice views his significant other or girlfriend as a project to change to reveal the her real character, but realistically he is troubled in terms of accepting her for her true ego. Hax’s (2013) advice is substantially supported by outside sources such as this, as she encourages him to let the woman be herself and have self-motivated change in her life, not forced change or a forced relationship. Another
(2006) The purpose of this study is to evaluate the regularity of acceptance in different relationships and regulate the change that occurs between couples. To view and assess these factors, several types of couples are critically evaluated. This included same-sex couples, couples married with children, without children, dating couples, and cohabitating pairs. (Christensen and Doss 290, 2006) To conduct such research, the researchers lead a longitudinal study with a method that is referred to as the Frequency and Acceptability of Partner Behaviour Inventory method, and self-determination theory. Along side online surveys and interviews, this method sanctions comparisons between the different categorical groups of couple’s satisfaction, in terms of positive or negative acceptance factors. These factors included such examples of acceptance, closeness, violation and demand. This method is predominantly drawn out with questions that lure out conclusions and discover correlations between groups. (Christensen and Doss 290, 2006) This study’s results progressed around troubled and wholesome couples, emphasizing differences in acceptance and change between the groups, as acceptance is used as a tool to understanding one another and identify areas that are or are not functioning. The research shows that relationships and behaviour do change when acceptance is involved and introduced into the bond. (Christensen and Doss 289, 2006). As mentioned before, the man seeking advice views his significant other or girlfriend as a project to change to reveal the her real character, but realistically he is troubled in terms of accepting her for her true ego. Hax’s (2013) advice is substantially supported by outside sources such as this, as she encourages him to let the woman be herself and have self-motivated change in her life, not forced change or a forced relationship. Another