When reading the written reviews based off of Ray Comfort’s documentary, the reviews were as I expected, harsh and angry right away. Even some Christian organizations and scientists didn’t like the flow and the way Comfort went on in his video. Dr. Hugh Ross is a creation scientist and president and founder of the Reasons To Believe Christian organization. He had one of his staff members write a review saying how the video hurts evangelism more than evolution and asked where in scripture does Jesus mock unbelievers who had different views than his?
Comfort, in my thoughts, never was attacking the students and professors he talked to. He was simply posing basic questions to them individually, asking that if evolution is as true as they make it out to be. Many could name countless examples off the top of their heads. These were not attacks, but more of a reality check to show them that they have faith in the experts in the field in evolution. While we, as believers of Christ, have faith in the everlasting perfect God. Not very hostile indeed we as Christians believe in scripture because of faith alone in Christ.
Reasons To Believe (RTB) wasn’t the only organization to lash out against the film. BioLogos, an evolutionist group, went as far as posting RTB’s review on the …show more content…
Throughout the film Comfort is not “stirring the pot” as critics claim. He shows compassion and is only expressing what he and other Christians see, that those who show blind faith in a theory that has no concrete evidence are lost. Concerning notes of Gospel come out of Comforts mouth, as he talks to the guests at the end of the film. He explains to them that God made the Earth and everything in it perfectly in the beginning, that man are of intelligent design not a random mistake that turned out well. God sent his son born under law to redeem us from our own mistakes, because that is how wonderful and merciful our God is to his
Comfort, in my thoughts, never was attacking the students and professors he talked to. He was simply posing basic questions to them individually, asking that if evolution is as true as they make it out to be. Many could name countless examples off the top of their heads. These were not attacks, but more of a reality check to show them that they have faith in the experts in the field in evolution. While we, as believers of Christ, have faith in the everlasting perfect God. Not very hostile indeed we as Christians believe in scripture because of faith alone in Christ.
Reasons To Believe (RTB) wasn’t the only organization to lash out against the film. BioLogos, an evolutionist group, went as far as posting RTB’s review on the …show more content…
Throughout the film Comfort is not “stirring the pot” as critics claim. He shows compassion and is only expressing what he and other Christians see, that those who show blind faith in a theory that has no concrete evidence are lost. Concerning notes of Gospel come out of Comforts mouth, as he talks to the guests at the end of the film. He explains to them that God made the Earth and everything in it perfectly in the beginning, that man are of intelligent design not a random mistake that turned out well. God sent his son born under law to redeem us from our own mistakes, because that is how wonderful and merciful our God is to his