The Southern Mindset Analysis

Improved Essays
The Southern Mindset: An Analysis of the Threat of a Race War, Racial Equality, and Abolitionist Sabotage in the Causation of the Civil War

The primary causes for the Civil War will be defined through the perceived threat of a race war, the dissolution of the Southern plantation aristocracy, and abolitionist sabotage in the South. In the South, many commissioners that discussed the possibility of secession were concerned about the liberation of African slaves, which might result in the extermination of the slave owning aristocracy. This deeply rooted fear was actually fomented by Thomas Jefferson, and other members of the southern aristocracy, that felt that liberating the slaves would result in a race war in the south: “A sudden emancipation,
…show more content…
In many cases. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850, The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854, and the Wilmot Proviso would represent a longstanding struggle between Southern and Northern political opposition to equal rights for slaves. However, a majority of these legislative compromises would be contained within the jurisdiction of the federalist oversight, which was increasingly being viewed as a threat to Southern sovereignty. In the South, the values of racial purity were a major threat to the plantation aristocracy, which defined on the inequality of blacks and whites as part of the southern economy. After all, who would work the plantations if African slaves could become wage earners like many white laborers? Certainly, an egalitarian society was not in the most profitable interests of white slave owners, especially in the eyes of southern commissioners that argued in favor of secession to combat the federalist ploys to end slavery: “The impending imposition of racial equality informed speeches of other commissioners as well, [especially in the case of] Thomas J. Wharton, Mississippi’s attorney general and the state’s commissioner to Tennessee (Dew 56). In this manner, commissioners in the Deep South viewed the northern federalist government as a threat to the southern way of life, which always revolved around the …show more content…
In effect, there were small-scale wars through these territories between pro-slave and abolitionist factions, which incited an increasingly militaristic view of a coming war. Southerners were concerned that abolitionists would sabotage new slave settlements in the west, which increased hostilities between the north and the South. In this manner, the rationale for a southern Confederacy became a more realistic goal, since the federal government was essentially making it a “first-come/first-serve” style of territorial expansion. This only encouraged a feeling of distrust of southerners for abolitionists, which galvanized a more aggressive militaristic position, especially in the context of secessionist ideology. Therefore, abolitionist sabotage and militarism was a primary catalyst for the southern secessionist movement, since it appeared that the northern federalist government was not willing to provide a means of balancing the issue of slave and free state sovereignty. This is a major reason why white southerners eventually shifted toward the secessionist movement, which was a major social and political catalyst for the Civil

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Commissioner of South Carolina, John Smith Preston, believes that “the South cannot exist without slavery…” (Page 72) which is why South Carolina was the first to succeed from the Union. Southerners did not want to put and end to slavery, therefore creating this uprising that influenced many factors such as states rights, the economy, and the state as a whole. With the many states succeeding in effort to dissolve the Union, politics played a big role between the North and the South. Dew realized that time and time again, in all the commissioners’ speeches and letters, slavery was always the main topic brought up along with other brief topics discussed in this book.…

    • 882 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What was the primary function of the commissioners? Who appointed the first commissioners and why? The primary function of the commissioners was to convince the other slave states to join them in secession.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2008 Dbq Analysis

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Mississippi, in their Declaration of Secession claimed the north had “recently obtained control of the Government, by prosecution of its unhallowed schemes, and destroyed the last expectation of living together in friendship and brotherhood.” Georgia, in their Declaration of Secession put forward the idea “The party of Lincoln, called the Republican party… is admitted to be an anti-slavery party.” “…anti-slavery is its mission and purpose.” South Carolina which started the slippery slope of secession with its Declaration of Secession by stating “A geographical line has been drawn across the Union, and all the States north of that line have united in the election of a man to the high office of President of the United States whose opinions and purposes are hostile to slavery.” “…he (Lincoln) has declared that the “Government cannot endure permanently half slave, half free.”…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Sectionalism Civil War

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Sectionalism is what made slavery the cause of the seperation between the north and south, they both thought differently with slavery. And with the problem only made the south more tense with Abraham Lincoln president,…

    • 144 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout the early and mid-1800s, sectional tensions arose throughout America. Sectionalism, or the loyalty to a particular subsegment of the Nation, rather than loyalty to the United States as a whole, was a pervasive characteristic of this period. Many factors contributed to these sectional tensions, however, the most divisive factor among the parties was the controversy over slavery. Slavery during this time was largely well-accepted in the South, but typically denigrated in the North. When the institution of slavery was condemned and threatened by the North, many southerners felt that their very survival and way of life was at risk.…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    First, Abraham Lincoln’s election as president was a huge blow to the southern community, as it made them nervous he would eventually abolish slavery. They considered this a threat to their luxury of enjoying the profit of slavery. Although Lincoln was clear about his opposition of slavery he also admitted he had not intention of messing with the South’s slave system. For example, Lincoln said, “I have no purpose, directly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists (Hine, 2014).” Be that as it may, the South was not convinced.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedmen's Bureau Essay

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, at the same time, while it was attempting to make things better, things were getting worse as well. There were whites in the South as well as in the North that did not want things to be different than they once were. They were strong believers in that their particular skin color was superior above anyone else’s. They wanted things to stay the same. They were not used to doing for themselves because they were so used to the slaves doing everything.…

    • 1843 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, after the Civil War, Southerner leaders, Neo-Confederates and some revisionists historians downplayed the importance of slavery as the main cause of the Civil War. Instead these critics have surmised that a multitude of causes centered around various social and economic sectional differences as well as state’s rights theories that eventually lead to war. Regardless of these claims, the preservation of slavery and white superiority are ultimately the underlying lynch pins at the core of these theories that economic, political or social differences were the causes of the Civil War. Moreover, to ensure Southern secession, Southern leaders protected this racially motivated system by spreading fear of racial equality, war between the races and amalgamation of the races at the hands of Northerners who opposed slavery. Southern leaders later deflected their attempts to maintain their race based social and economic hierarchy with theories of states’ rights and sectional differences after their defeat in the Civil…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sectionalism In 1820-1850

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the years between 1820 and 1850, the controversy of sectionalism and slavery was very much alive. The South wanted to use slaves as a way to keep their fragile economy stable, but the moral contradictions of owning other people was too much for many in the North. And with the growing popularity of expanding the country westward, a new issue was created regarding how new territories would decide their slavery status. Westward expansion impacted the development of sectionalism from 1820-1850 in the United States politically due to Manifest Destiny, a harmful ideology that drove white Americans into the West in the first place, the Missouri Compromise, an amendment prohibiting the use slaves above the Louisiana Territory line, and the Wilmot Proviso, which further tried to prohibit slavery in the territories acquired from Mexico.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As Henry David Thoreau describes, “The soldier is applauded who refuses to serve in an unjust war by those who do not refuse to sustain the unjust government which makes the war” (Civil Disobedience). Thoreau explains how one disregards the opposing opponent for the sake of refusing to cooperate with the other. The South refuses to agree with the North based off on the differences of their own opinions and their very differently unique ways of life. Their internal problems with one another escalates to another level of unacceptability. They could not put slavery aside to discuss other issues, and this led to slavery becoming the main cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to determine if the Civil War was inevitable, we must first look at what the root cause of the Civil War was. The states seceded from the Union, because they had originally been free and were self governing. Since the federal government started to take powers away from the states, relations between the Southern states and the federal government started to become hostile. Had the federal government allowed the states to be self governing, there would not have been a Civil War, but since the federal government continued to trample on the states rights, they felt they had no choice but to secede. After the colonists fought for their freedom from a tyrannical overarching government, they were free…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Slavery was the underlying cause of the American Civil War. After the Republican and abolitionist Abraham Lincoln won the election in 1861, southern states became afraid of his political believes. His election caused major discussion in the southern states, that depended on slavery. States were preparing for secession because of the new president’s future actions. These states were very dependent on agriculture and abolishing slavery would certainly hurt them.…

    • 1799 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The expanse of war in the South was much larger than in the North. Leaving many plantation destroyed and the cotton market that would not recover. The Civil War was viewed by the South as the “Lost Cause” (textbook, 452) justifying the defeat by moving on hoping for a better future. In turn, the white southern seen the African Americans as “adversaries” (textbook, 453) seeing them as challenging the superiority of white southerner. With so much destruction of property and the defeat to the psych of the southern people.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction The American Civil war occurred during the years 1861 – 1865, and as stated in the article titled “The Civil War”, it “was the cauldron that created modern America. The war preserved the Union, ending the possibility of the American nation dividing into two or more separate countries, in the process altering the nations politics and government, creating a strong presidency and an increasingly important federal infrastructure” (Finkelman sec. 1) However, the American Civil War did not come without coast, as wars never do, an estimated 620,000 men lost their lives in the line of duty. One of the many, yet major causes of this war, came about through slavery; and the standpoint that the northern states took, wanting to abolish slavery,…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays