As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed.
Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery. They also wanted to be able to set up operations into new territories but would not be able to run business as they had in the slave states. In 1857, A land mark supreme court judgment caused many people to rethink the slavery issue and heightened tensions between abolitionists and supporters of slavery. Dred Scott had lived in a free state for many years. He and his family had been emancipated by their owner and argued that their years north of the Missouri compromise line where slavery was not allowed, entitled him to their freedom. The issue was carried to the supreme court in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney declared that all of American history regarded "the class of persons who had been imported as slaves [and] their descendants, so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." The Scotts were initially denied their freedom, which fueled abolitionist ideas and opinions in the idea of new states and territories being pro slavery or free states. (pdf Freeing Dred Scott) An Event that may have stated the American …show more content…
The Missouri compromise had prohibited slavery north of 36 degrees do north, but groups of settlers in Kansas who had come from slave states, like Missouri, believed slavery should be permitted in the territory. Other settlers were from the North and wanted to make the area a free state. The result was upheaval and rioting. The fighting carried east by abolitionist John Brown who believed the will of God justified violence and would overthrow slavery. Brown and his followers, seven of whom were black, attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry in 1859 in a failed attempt to arm a slave rebellion. Brown was captured and executed and his efforts became a symbol of abolition in the North. (494)
In 1845 the United States Congress voted to annex Texas, then fought and won a war to claim land north of the Rio Grande. The first of many attempts to restrict slavery in territories grew out of the Mexican-American War. California had entered the U. S. as a free state in The Compromise of 1850. That same year, Texas claimed the New Mexico territory. The Rio Grande, was boundary between slavery and freedom for Texas’ African Americans both freed and enslaved. In a negotiation for a land swap for a Texan slave, Guy M Bryan discussed the problems with holding slaves so near the Mexico border where the idea of freedom was tantalizingly close.
` I now have some unpleasant news to communicate. the [sic] negroes on Brazos
[sic] made an attempt to rise. Majr Sutherland came on here for a few men
Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery. They also wanted to be able to set up operations into new territories but would not be able to run business as they had in the slave states. In 1857, A land mark supreme court judgment caused many people to rethink the slavery issue and heightened tensions between abolitionists and supporters of slavery. Dred Scott had lived in a free state for many years. He and his family had been emancipated by their owner and argued that their years north of the Missouri compromise line where slavery was not allowed, entitled him to their freedom. The issue was carried to the supreme court in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney declared that all of American history regarded "the class of persons who had been imported as slaves [and] their descendants, so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." The Scotts were initially denied their freedom, which fueled abolitionist ideas and opinions in the idea of new states and territories being pro slavery or free states. (pdf Freeing Dred Scott) An Event that may have stated the American …show more content…
The Missouri compromise had prohibited slavery north of 36 degrees do north, but groups of settlers in Kansas who had come from slave states, like Missouri, believed slavery should be permitted in the territory. Other settlers were from the North and wanted to make the area a free state. The result was upheaval and rioting. The fighting carried east by abolitionist John Brown who believed the will of God justified violence and would overthrow slavery. Brown and his followers, seven of whom were black, attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry in 1859 in a failed attempt to arm a slave rebellion. Brown was captured and executed and his efforts became a symbol of abolition in the North. (494)
In 1845 the United States Congress voted to annex Texas, then fought and won a war to claim land north of the Rio Grande. The first of many attempts to restrict slavery in territories grew out of the Mexican-American War. California had entered the U. S. as a free state in The Compromise of 1850. That same year, Texas claimed the New Mexico territory. The Rio Grande, was boundary between slavery and freedom for Texas’ African Americans both freed and enslaved. In a negotiation for a land swap for a Texan slave, Guy M Bryan discussed the problems with holding slaves so near the Mexico border where the idea of freedom was tantalizingly close.
` I now have some unpleasant news to communicate. the [sic] negroes on Brazos
[sic] made an attempt to rise. Majr Sutherland came on here for a few men