Westward Expansion And The Civil War

Improved Essays
As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed.
Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery. They also wanted to be able to set up operations into new territories but would not be able to run business as they had in the slave states. In 1857, A land mark supreme court judgment caused many people to rethink the slavery issue and heightened tensions between abolitionists and supporters of slavery. Dred Scott had lived in a free state for many years. He and his family had been emancipated by their owner and argued that their years north of the Missouri compromise line where slavery was not allowed, entitled him to their freedom. The issue was carried to the supreme court in Dred Scott v. Sandford. Chief Justice Roger B. Taney declared that all of American history regarded "the class of persons who had been imported as slaves [and] their descendants, so far inferior that they had no rights which the white man was bound to respect." The Scotts were initially denied their freedom, which fueled abolitionist ideas and opinions in the idea of new states and territories being pro slavery or free states. (pdf Freeing Dred Scott) An Event that may have stated the American
…show more content…
The Missouri compromise had prohibited slavery north of 36 degrees do north, but groups of settlers in Kansas who had come from slave states, like Missouri, believed slavery should be permitted in the territory. Other settlers were from the North and wanted to make the area a free state. The result was upheaval and rioting. The fighting carried east by abolitionist John Brown who believed the will of God justified violence and would overthrow slavery. Brown and his followers, seven of whom were black, attacked and occupied the federal arsenal in Harpers Ferry in 1859 in a failed attempt to arm a slave rebellion. Brown was captured and executed and his efforts became a symbol of abolition in the North. (494)
In 1845 the United States Congress voted to annex Texas, then fought and won a war to claim land north of the Rio Grande. The first of many attempts to restrict slavery in territories grew out of the Mexican-American War. California had entered the U. S. as a free state in The Compromise of 1850. That same year, Texas claimed the New Mexico territory. The Rio Grande, was boundary between slavery and freedom for Texas’ African Americans both freed and enslaved. In a negotiation for a land swap for a Texan slave, Guy M Bryan discussed the problems with holding slaves so near the Mexico border where the idea of freedom was tantalizingly close.
` I now have some unpleasant news to communicate. the [sic] negroes on Brazos
[sic] made an attempt to rise. Majr Sutherland came on here for a few men

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Right after the Mexican War, many new lands west of Texas debated over the westward expansion of slavery. Expanding slavery for the southerners was important because slave owners needed to have new land to put under cultivation because of the tendency to plant cash crops. Southern politicians and slave owners also demanded that slavery be allowed in the west because they feared that their economy would collapse. Northerners however believed that slavery should be banned from the new territories.…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Polk called for annexation of both Texas and Oregon (by the Oregon Treaty) and won the presidency of 1844. Just as promise, Teas and Oregon was added to the United States. Mexico was not satisfied with the decision because it never formally recognized Texan independence. In the treaty that Santa Anna signed it states the southern boundary of Texas at the Rio Grande, but the Mexican government claimed the boundary at the Nueces River.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the Missouri Compromise was drawn up there was little to no objection; maintaining the balance of slave and free states seemed far enough. But then more issues arose when…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas Annexation Proposal

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages

    People living in Texas territory in 1844 were concerned about several issues related to the Texas annexation proposal. These included uncertain relations with Mexico, concerns about Texas debt, the prospects of safety and prosperity offered by annexation, the call to expand the U.S. because of Manifest Destiny, resolution of the slavery issue, possible interference by England and the expected results of not annexing Texas. The benefits of annexing Texas to the United States outweighed potential difficulties. Relations With Mexico…

    • 863 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It received backlash from both the south and the north, “The Missouri Compromise…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    1. Describe and explain how slavery affected the economic, social, and political development of the South during the first half of the nineteenth century. Why did Slavery become the essential difference between the North and the South? What are the long-term effects of slavery?…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Introduction During the 1800s the North and South came to a crossroads; their outlooks on slavery were rather diverse. The South did not wish to lose its moneymaking, comfortable, and rapacious slavery industry, especially plantation slavery. However, on the other hand, the North was rising up with a sense of conviction toward the nature of slavery. The South pursued the expansion of slavery and the North sought its abolishment. Slavery was the most disputed subject in that time.…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Polk Dbq Analysis

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages

    His vision was to annex Mexican territory, Texas and Oregon. Texas was a slave state and popular in the South. Northerners objected to the spread of slavery and opposed annexation. Texas was annexed at the end of 1845. Oregon was simultaneously annexed as a free country.…

    • 871 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Texas gained its independence from Mexico in 1836, the U.S. was hesitant in deciding whether it was the right decision to admit Texas into the union or not. This was because they understood that any form of annexation would lead to war between Mexico and the United States. Although they understood the potential consequences, the United States either way admitted Texas into the union bringing then debates on territorial boundaries and the definition of the new territory as a slave state or free state. The Mexican American War was a war fought on foreign soil between the United States and Mexico because they were in disagreement over where the Mexican-American border should be after the annexation of Texas. This war marked a turning point…

    • 174 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although the United States government took many steps to try and prevent sectionalism and tensions because of territorial expansion, the tensions between the North and the South In 1819 Missouri had a big enough population to be admitted into the union. However Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state which would disrupt the balance in representation in the Senate. Congress enacted the Missouri Compromise which would admit Missouri as a slave state, admit Maine as a free state as well as outlawing slavery north of 36°30. This was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery. Thus resolving the crisis it did not help settle conflicts and eventually Missouri was repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Compromise Of 1850 Essay

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages

    It stated that (for the North) California was to be admitted as a free stare, which also set off the “balance” of slave-to-non-slave sates, slave trade was to be prohibited in Washington D.C., and that Texas would lose the boundary dispute with New Mexico. In other words, the south got no slavery restrictions in Utah or New Mexico territories, slaveholding permitted in Washington D.C., Texas would get 10 million dollars, and the Fugitive Slave Law (authorized local governments to capture and return escaped slaves to their owners and had imposed penalties on anyone who aided in the slave’s flight) would be passed. The Fugitive Slave Law caused the most controversy, however. Though both the North and South benefited from the Compromise of 1850, the Compromise seemed to favor the North. This infuriated the…

    • 1860 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Annexation Of Texas Essay

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The Annexation of Texas The annexation of Texas by the United States remains a controversial topic to this day. Occurring in 1845, it caused a great uproar amongst the citizens of the United States and Texas. The main question when debating the annexation of Texas is how it affected slavery. Indeed, and because the annexation of slavery served to extend the area in which slavery would be allowed, this caused a situation in which it shifted the balance of power away from the North and towards the South in relation to the question of slavery.…

    • 2045 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays