Territorial Expansion In The 1800s

Improved Essays
Although the United States government took many steps to try and prevent sectionalism and tensions because of territorial expansion, the tensions between the North and the South
In 1819 Missouri had a big enough population to be admitted into the union. However Missouri requested to be admitted as a slave state which would disrupt the balance in representation in the Senate. Congress enacted the Missouri Compromise which would admit Missouri as a slave state, admit Maine as a free state as well as outlawing slavery north of 36°30. This was criticized by many southerners because it established the principle that Congress could make laws regarding slavery; northerners, on the other hand, condemned it for acquiescing in the expansion of slavery. Thus resolving the crisis it did not help settle conflicts and eventually Missouri was repealed by the Kansas Nebraska Act. Because Missouri was to be added as a slave state from the desire to move west in Americans, the topic of slavery set off a roaring blaze that could not be put out.
…show more content…
Stephen A. Douglas, the Senator who drafted the bill, intended for it to provide a path to development for a Transcontinental Railroad. However, the popular sovereignty clause in the Act led to anti-slavery settlers from the North and pro-slavery settlers from the South to migrate to Kansas in order to vote on the matter of slavery, which resulted in a small civil war called “Bleeding Kansas”. Because of Manifest Destiny moving west extending the tensions between the North and South this was exemplified by the idea of popular sovereignty that gave people further reason to settle in the new

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Significance of the Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine The Missouri Compromise and the Monroe Doctrine were two of the most important documents written in the presidency of James Monroe (Shi 2016). Both were received much debate and mixed reviews, but have great significance in American History. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 came about as a result of fear in the South that states added from the western territories would be admitted as free states and cause an imbalance (Shi 2016). At the time, the states were equally divided, eleven slave states and eleven free states.…

    • 360 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri was well known for its slavery in the 1800s. If the Missouri Compromise didn’t happen, it was of changed the United States today greatly. The Missouri Compromise accomplished making Missouri a slave state and changing Maine into a free state because it wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. There were 22 states at the time equally divided into 11 slave states and 11 free slave states. There was chaos when the Missouri compromise was made, so they made Maine a free of slave state to even out the states.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Between 1800 and 1860, the life of the northerners and the southerners differed drastically. The extreme differences lead to such severe tensions that caused the two regions of America to loath one another’s presence. Due to theses tensions ¬¬the north and the south made decisions that satisfied their lives concerning the process of the economic, and political systems. Eventually, as the decisions were being made the closer the nation was leading to the Civil War.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One major controversy of the 1850s was the Kansas-Nebraska Act which was around 1854, A man by the name of Stephan Douglas made a proposal that Kansas and Nebraska be divided into two sections while the Missouri compromise be repealed, settlers had to decipher on whether or not to they wanted slavery in their territories which was popular sovereignty. In relation to the expansion of slavery, this contributed to the divide of America on the how the Union looked at slavery and the Confederacy. Many states had their own stances on slavery as they were either pro-slavery or anti-slavery. Kansas with slavery would violate the Missouri compromise, which for the most part kept the Union intact over the last few decades. As a result of this Kansas-Nebraska…

    • 207 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During 1803 to 1853, the United States almost tripled in her size. In the early 1800s, the land located in the west part of the United States was not developed so much. Even before the American colonies won their independence from Britain in the Revolutionary War, settlers were migrating westward. Western area had many sufficient lands to live because President Thomas Jefferson purchased the territory of Louisiana from the French In 1803. Many considered it to be uncivilized and underdeveloped even though it was home to many native peoples and the settlers from France, Spain, Mexico and many other countries.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    For the majority of American History leading up to the Civil War, civilians had been divided over the issue of slavery and politics. The nation had a long history of compromise that seemed necessary to keep the nation unified. Most of these compromises avoided the issue of slavery, as politicians and “great compromisers” like Henry Clay aimed to prevent the inevitable split between the North and South. There was a turning point, however, in the North and South, when compromise was no longer an option. Although the election of Abraham Lincoln in 1860 was the immediate and final trigger for southern secession, other attributes including the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Bleeding Kansas, and the Dred Scott decision of 1857 drove the South further towards…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Although popular demand typically determines decisions made within America, the government overrules them in order to get results that they want. Prior to the Kansas-Nebraska Act, America created the Missouri Compromise, which allowed states under the border of Missouri and Missouri itself to be slave states, while anything over the border of Missouri must be free and allowed a ratio of 1:1 slave to free states be admitted into the Union. However, when determining whether Kansas would be a free state or not, the popular sovereignty that ranked highest was for it being a free state. Nevertheless, the government decided to admit Kansas in as a slave state. Not only did this oppose the Missouri Compromise as it broke the geographical line that…

    • 222 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bleeding Kansas was a very violent matter that led up to the Civil War. There was so much bloodshed for the state which caused the name "Bleeding Kansas. " Both pro and anti slavery settlers were both arguing for the state. Both groups wanted to control the state so violent uprising occurred. Because of the Kansas Nebraska Act it allowed one state to decide if it would be a pro or anti slavery state.…

    • 155 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Varied reasons promoted America’s Westward Expansion in the 19th century. In the beginning of the century, the main expansion catalysts were the nation’s new acquisition of land and opportunities. In 1803, President Thomas Jefferson bought the Louisiana Territory from France, doubling the size of the United States and providing a large area west for expansion. During the 1820s, westward migration became popular among American citizens, however, they experienced difficulty pervading national borders as a result of Indians occupying the surrounding land. In response to this, Hamilton passed a law in 1830 to remove Native Americans from their promised territories bordering the United States; later known as the Indian Removal Act.…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Not long afterwards, the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 took place. This repealed the Missouri Compromise. Kansas and Nebraska were both to vote using popular sovereignty to decide on slavery. Both pro-slavery settlers and anti-slavery settlers rushed to the area to gain the upper hand of the states, resulting in absolute chaos. As a result states’ rights and Manifest Destiny played a role in the cause of the Civil War.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays