Sectional Differences Between 1800 And 1860

Superior Essays
Between 1800 and 1860, economic, social, and political factors contributed to the development of sectional differences between the North and the South. These differences included how best to expand the United States economy, the extension of slavery into the territories, and the relationship between the states and the federal government. These differences laid the groundwork for the Civil War. The North and South followed different paths, developing into two distinct and very different regions. The North economy is mostly relied on manufacturing and industrialization and the South economy is mostly relied on plantation and cotton. The north and the south had two different types of society and social structure. The north and south had different …show more content…
The north was industrials and rapid growth of cities. The population in north was increasing due industrialization. By 1860, one quarter of all Northerners lived in urban areas. Because of the rise of industrialization people in the north had classes. There was three classes; wealthy, middle class, working class. The working class was the poorest of all class, which were factory workers and other low status workers. Also it led to the rise of immigrant. Most of the immigrants came from Europe and settle in major cities like (NYC, Boston, etc.). There were more development in schools and higher education. Few Working class children received education, but they didn’t receive the best one. The north was not racist and didn’t need slaves. Slave labor had become less useful, replaced in the cities and factories by immigrant labor from Europe and thought the slaves work wasn’t needed for their work. The north was against slavery. Also there was no point of slaves and said there should be no more slavery and they should have their own rights. In document (2) American anti-slavery society states that slavery was the most horrible system of bondage that ever existed in any country. Therefore slavery should be stop and was wrong. The south was agriculture and not many developments. Although the south was mainly rural, cities did gradually develop. Transportation between cities was difficult, except by …show more content…
The north was republican and south was democratic. The north and south fought over the balance of power in the congress. The Missouri compromise which came up during the anti-slavery time. The northwest of 1787 had created that no state northwest of the Ohio River could be a slave state. Because Missouri was not northwest of the Ohio River, it wanted enter the union as a slave state. But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south. Another point was slavery would be closed from north of 36 degrees and 30N latitude in the Louisiana Purchase. the annexation of Texas which was to join Texas to united states in southwest. The southern democratic supported this idea, but the Whig and northern opposed this decision. The north thought it would have another slave state to the southwest. The north defeated the treaty in congress by senate. Later on new president James Polk came and started war with Mexico to get Texas. In document (4) the Massachusetts legislature opposed the annexation of Texas, because the war was being fought to extend

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Missouri Compromise Dbq

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Prior to the time of the Missouri compromise, there were an equal number of slave states to free states thus there was an equal balance of power in congress. Once Missouri had applied for admission into the union there was instant disapproval from the northern territories for they had thought that the south already had a substantial amount of power. The Missouri compromise was a way to balance congress of free and slave states. The compromise itself was passed in 1820 giving Missouri the title of a slave state and Maine the title of a free state. Therefore it settled a rising dispute between the slave and free territories.…

    • 177 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri was well known for its slavery in the 1800s. If the Missouri Compromise didn’t happen, it was of changed the United States today greatly. The Missouri Compromise accomplished making Missouri a slave state and changing Maine into a free state because it wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. There were 22 states at the time equally divided into 11 slave states and 11 free slave states. There was chaos when the Missouri compromise was made, so they made Maine a free of slave state to even out the states.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Despite that the American Civil War officially began April 13, 1861 at Fort Sumter; the Civil war had been in a making for quite some time. Ever since America was barely formed the differences between the people of the North and the South arose, and as time and progression continued so did the tension in between the two. The geography was considerably dissimilar. The North dealt with bays and harbors, frozen winters and warm summers, and rocky and infertile soil.…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The North and South were a part of the same country but their economies were very different. The North's economy was based on manufacturing finished goods at a fast pace using lots of factories and workers. The South's economy was based on farming cash crops and raw materials to export to other countries. Document A from the What Caused the Civil War DBQ shows that almost all of the cotton production in the U.S. was in the South. Document B from the What Caused the Civil War DBQ shows that 90% of the yearly value of manufactured goods came from the North.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    With industrialization peeking in the late 19th century everything that was daily life was bound to change one way or another. These changes varied in affect around the country in both economic and cultural ways. The biggest difference in change came from the separation of the north and south, causing life to be vastly different in those regions. The northern states were more industrialized and the south lagged behind almost like a third world country. This lead to different problems, different solutions, and overall an almost completely different impact on both sides.…

    • 347 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the early 1800’s, two ideologies dominated American society and politics, nationalism and sectionalism. Nationalism is when a person has strong feelings and pride in his country, while sectionalism is when a person only has pride in a particular region of the nation. While both of these ideologies were influential, but one of these ideologies would arise to become more popular and influence more political actions than the other. It can be argued that nationalism is the older of the two ideals. It influence the colonists to declare their independence from Great Britain, leading to the American Revolution and the creation of the United States of America.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With time though slaves were no longer in the northern states and only in the southern. The economy and politics in the south never really changed. The South embraced their ways and viewed them as the best, while the North advanced and changed greatly. The North was now filled with factories and produced a large percentage of finished goods, but the cotton of the South made up the largest percentage of the countries exported goods. The south had a rather distinct class system planters being the richest and so on and at the bottom are slaves.…

    • 1810 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise. This compromise agreed to admit Missouri as a slave state and then admit Maine as a free state to keep the balance of free and slave states in the country. It also created the 36’ 30° line. The 36’ 30° line was an imaginary line on the southern border of Missouri above which it was agreed new states could not hold slaves. Many in the south saw this as an act in support of the abolition of slavery, which helped to increase tensions between the north and south over the issue of slavery (Missouri n.d.).…

    • 575 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Brilliant Essays

    John Brown Abolition Movement

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited

    Economically the regions were very different, with the North being very industrial and independent, and the South relying heavily on the export of cotton to pay for the goods they needed to import. The federal government had a hard time creating fair taxes to keep both regions happy. Politically, the South fiercely believed in states' rights, while the North felt that a strong federal government could best lead the nation. Socially, the North and South differed on the issue of slavery and led very different lifestyles. Abolitionists fought for African-American freedom while many Southerners fought to keep the workers they needed to run their plantations.…

    • 1892 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 3 Works Cited
    Brilliant Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the ways the United States gained new territory is when Texas wanted to secede from Mexico and join the Union. (Doc 2) Texas wrote the Treaty of Annexation in April 22, 1844 to the United States congress granting them their property to be controlled by the United States. Texas wrote this because they wanted to have slavery, but Mexico had outlawed slavery. Mexico was not happy with this decision and resulted in the Mexican – American war, causing casualties. This war also led to more tension and bloodshed in the long run, because of an increase in sectionalism between the North and South.…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    For instance, education was a big difference between the North and the South. Everyone valued education, but in the South there was not any public school where children could attend unlike the North. Because there was plenty of land in the South, each landowner lived on their own land causing everyone one to be distant. Distance was the reason preventing public school from being built because there was not enough children from an area to start a school. In contrary, there was more people in the North living together in a small area which mean that there was enough people in an area for a school to start a school.…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The South had a very different culture than the North. The biggest difference between the two was the legalization of slavery. The South was very dependent on slave labor because the large profitable plantations had to be maintained. The South was very rural compared to the North. Almost eighty percent of all Southerners work on farms in 1860.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    From the moment the ink dried on the Constitution, Northerners and Southerners carried deeply held differences about the meaning of nationhood. For the South, the nation was only an alliance of sovereign states that had power independent from the federal government. To the North, the creation of the Constitution was the start of a nation with a strong federal government that overruled the states. These opposing viewpoints were the result of the different cultural identities and political institutions of the two regions, and were reinforced as the nation developed. The South developed around an agricultural lifestyle, based upon the labor force provided by slavery, and dominated by a landed aristocracy.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays