Race And Racism In The Film Twelve Angry Men

Great Essays
Justice is Not Just
The justice system does not give a fair trial to those outside of cultural norms. These norms usually consist of “white, middle class” people. Trials are unfair because of stereotypes held by jurors and biased opinions against the poor and minority populations. These problems have been entrenched in our culture for centuries and are exposed in popular media and culture. Not only does the 1957 movie, Twelve Angry Men, show these biases, they are also shown in the more recent movie from 1996, A Time to Kill.
From my perspective, there are many inequalities in the judicial system used in our country. An example of this is racial inequality. A Time to Kill highlights racial tensions throughout the movie. This movie is
…show more content…
They would also note the First Amendment, which gives the right to think and speak what you feel. A group that supports racial stereotyping and prejudice would be the Ku Klux Klan. This is a secret society in the southern United States that focuses on white supremacy and terrorizes other groups. This “secret society” is an important part of the movie A Time to Kill. Throughout this movie, the Ku Klux Klan is attacking any white person that has to do with Carl Lee Hailey’s trial. Whether it is putting a bomb under Jake Brigance’s house or attacking Ethel and her husband, the Ku Klux Klan is fighting for white supremacy. This organization began in 1865, but is still around today. Business Insider claims, “there are active chapters in 41 U.S. states, with between 5,000 and 8,000 active …show more content…
In this movie, juror number ten states, “How can you believe him, knowing what he is? I lived among ‘em all my life. You can’t believe a word they say.” This reveals that he has a personal bias against people living in poverty and already has preconceived beliefs about the defendant before listening to any of the facts. Not only does juror number ten show bias, so do jurors eight and three. In this film, the eighth juror shows sympathy, as he grew up in poverty himself. The accused boy reminds juror number three of his

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    This demonstrates prejudice because according to the 8th Juror, the 3rd Juror is being prejudice since he just desires the boy’s death for his own personal reasons. Additionally, the fact that he doesn’t refute it shows that it is probably true. Another time when the 3rd Juror demonstrates prejudice is at the end of the story. He states, “The phrase was “I’m gonna kill you.” That’s what he said.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scottsboro boys Racism and bias run through our so called justice system, how can we say we practice fair punishment until everyone is treated equal in the court room? At a time when racial tension was high, 9 boys were wrongly arrested and held to an unfair trial that would have brought them to their death if it wasn’t for the international attention that the boys gained due to its demonstration of blatant racial discrimination, as well as the lawyers association with a U.S communist party Who were the Scottsboro boys? The name not only implies their youth but, due to the time and place, their racial inferiority. The nine boys, aged 13 to 21 were all illiterate, one of them was nearly blind and another disabled (Scottsboro Case, SIRS Discoverer.)…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Forty-three years after the Ku Klux Klan was established, a group known as the NAACP was founded on February 12, 1909 as a civil rights organization to fight for equality. “NAACP stands for the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People” (historystudycenter). The original KKK group had flourished in 1865 but was quickly shut down in 1877. Before things got better, the next group of KKK members has arose in 1950’s now apposing more catholics and jews. Although the KKK had been around since the 1800’s they still continued to discriminate even after an act was passed called “ The Ku Klux Klan act” in April 1871.…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Racism in the American Justice System Forms of crime and justice have been relevant and can be traced all the way back to the first civilized societies of the Ancient world. Fortunately these systems have reformed to reflect changing customs, political ideals, and economic conditions of a given society. That being said, one would think that America’s justice system would be one of the most progressive in the world. However, looking at the overwhelming evidence, the it is actually to the contrary. As the book The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness outlines, it has been proven that the American criminal justice system is in fact, inherently racist.…

    • 1396 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Reflection

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Juror eight has very good observation skills. He almost is a detective juror, he seeks answers and he is good at creating scenarios to find answers. Juror eight gave his reason why he had doubt still, and why the other eleven should look the case over more. Juror eight then wanted to take another vote. He agreed that after his points, if no one else votes none-guilty that he will agree with a guilty verdict also.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The sixth amendment states, “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused should enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state…” (Bill of Rights). This amendment is saying that every single person has the right to a fair trial, no matter who you are. This is correct, and the amendment itself is put together very well. The issue is that not every single courtroom is following this.…

    • 589 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Questions On 12 Angry Men

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Jury 9: He is an old man and experienced. He observes and interprets in a rational way. He was bold enough to support Jury#8. • Now step back and focus on the systemic level: What clue does their personal history (occupation, nationality, socio-economic status, family circumstances, or educational background) provide about the societal faction each juror…

    • 1226 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the B A 321 textbook, facilitation is the set of activities carried out before, during, and after meetings to help a group achieve its own outcomes. A facilitator is someone who performs these activities, helping the team by monitoring and improving its internal process. Twelve Angry Men, a movie about an open-and-shut murder trial in which one juror stands alone in his beliefs, made use of facilitation. When the twelve jurors were sent to deliberate a unanimous verdict, the case was not as clear-cut as they once thought. The jurors were made up of twelve men of diverse backgrounds.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror eight appealed to the jury’s values. He told a story about the innocent boy (innocent when he was young) being harmed as he was growing up. The boy was beaten by his dad when he was young. Juror eight did a tremendous job of appealing to the emotions of the others; as his approach changes the minds of the jurors. For example, Juror number nine says “this gentleman has been standing alone against us, he doesn’t say the boy isn’t guilty, he just isn’t sure” (12 angry men 1957).…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Okay. Eleven to one, guilty.” (Rose 4). At first glance, all the jurors excluding Juror #8, view the boy as guilty. They claim that this is due to the evidence they were presented with, but it is also related to their bias and the fact that they want to go home as early as possible.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is uncommon to observe somebody who likes to be compelled to be some place or accomplish something they don 't have a longing to do. In, 12 Angry Men, we are given only that. Twelve men, of every single different backgrounds and experiences are told they must spend their own valuable time to judge a man on the premise of evidence that was presented to them. Gladding would call this kind of group an errand/work aggregate. This sort of group meets up to finish amass undertaking objectives.…

    • 837 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    12 Angry Men Thesis

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    I feel strongly about that because the movie made me question what I believed to be true based on what other people said rather than forming my own thoughts. In the movie 12 Angry Men the twelve men at first sat down and took an outloud vote on whether they thought the defendant was guilty or not guilty. The law was that it had to be all twelve for one or the…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The criminal justice system is supposed to be a fair system. However, many argue that it is a flawed system. The criminal justice system is flawed because there aren’t enough minorities working in this field. The criminal justice system needs to be fair to everyone regardless of their background. If this problem is resolved, the criminal justice system will take a step in the right direction.…

    • 878 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Juror 3 Analysis

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages

    but there is time constraint and group think has been taken place in the movie. Juror 3 is a biased against the 19-year old boy and he stands strongly in his vote of guilty. As a juror, he has an expected to assist the judge to give a fair trial.…

    • 936 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    They are then challenged by the group leader, the architect. Another juror, who is a grumpy older man, calls architect a “bleeding heart”. He seems to have resentment against people who live in the slums. During this time, one juror asks the others to clarify their reasons for their guilty verdict to the architect, hoping the architect will change his mind. Shockingly, several of the jurors imply that the defendant being a poor, non-white, young man is reason enough for a conviction.…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays