Prosecutor's Charging Cases: A Case Study

Decent Essays
By almost any measure, the federal prosecutor's wielded too much power. Many federal laws govern similar behavior and are written broadly, prosecutor's commonly have multiple charges from which to chose. This means they typically have many sentencing ranges to chose from as well. Thus, they can--and do--threaten defendants who want to exercise their trial rights with charges that will carry longer sentences than the charges will file if defendants who refuse to waive their rights to a jury trial receive a sentence three times longer than who pled. And with the prevalence of mandatory minimum laws, a prosecutor's charging decisions often dictate a sentence that a judge is powerless to avoid. It is no wonder 97 percent of federal convictions

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In this new job, Warren tried criminal cases, defended civil and criminal suits against county officials, advised county boards of education about civil liability issues, and wrote legal opinions on various issues – such as real estate matters – for the county board of supervisors. Along the way, though, he discovered that his real first love was law enforcement and public service. Within three years, Warren had become the Alameda County’s District Attorney’s chief deputy. The county DA was Ezra Decoto, but in 1925 Decoto resigned and Earl Warren was chosen by the county’s Board of Supervisors to fill the unexpired term left by Decoto’s resignation. The next year, at the end of the term, Warren ran for the position and became Alameda County’s…

    • 370 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    LAWSUIT FILED OVER PUBLIC DEFENDER A Eureka criminal defense attorney on Friday filed a petition with the Humboldt County courthouse asking for a court order to fire the public defender that started in February. Patrik Griego, an attorney with the Janssen Malloy law firm, petitioned the court to compel county officials to fire David Marcus on the grounds the public defender is unqualified. Griego also asked for a judge to declare the county’s hiring process for the county’s top defense position is unlawful.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    MILLERSBURG — Outlining years of addiction that culminated in criminal charges for trafficking in drugs and an unrelated overdose, a Killbuck woman on Wednesday admitted to selling methamphetamine to an informant working with law enforcement. Devin Jade Williams, 22, whose last known address was 3251 Township Road 1021, pleaded guilty in Holmes County Common Pleas Court to two counts of trafficking in cocaine. In exchange for her guilty plea, the state dismissed four other drug trafficking charges. For her part, Williams agreed to repay $295 in buy money associated with all six charges.…

    • 579 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Prosecutors. 1. The text discusses the prosecutor’s office at work. From the tape, cite some examples of work issues related in the text.…

    • 1470 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Student’s Introduction There is more than one interpretation to this hypothetical and so more than one IRAC is used. These IRACs use a combination of FYLSE style along with some extra citation content from the open book perspective. The IRACs here are arguments of potential solutions to the call of the question. The Subject Statement is used to infer the Subject and then the Rule.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the modern legal system, most jurisdictions view a person as an adult at 18 years of age. Until a person reaches this age, they are less likely to receive the full extent of a jurisdiction’s legal system. At certain parts in a child’s life, age can be used as a valid defense. If a person is under 7 years of age, they will not be charged in most jurisdictions. From the age of 7 to the age of responsibility, which is usually recognized as 16 but varies by jurisdiction, an offender can be tried in the juvenile system (criminal Law Today).…

    • 1739 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Based on my opinion, plea bargaining should continue to be a part of our judicial system and each case should be tried on its own merits. We have some advantages and disadvantages to our justice system. Plea bargaining does serve a purpose in our criminal justice system. It saves the state resources and distributes benefits to one who takes on the responsibility for their crime." Approximately 95% of all criminal cases are resolved through plea bargaining" (Bohm & Haley, 2014, p.13).…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    27. The Plaintiff 's actions are detrimental to the Defendant 's daughter due to the fact that the Plaintiff is teaching her daughter like she has taught her son that the laws of the government can be ignored along with valid Court orders. 28. Both the Defendant’s children’s records demonstrate the detrimental harm that the Plaintiff has continuously brought to the Defendant’s children in her efforts to alienate them from their father. Additionally, as noted, the Defendant’s son who has not had visitation with him for several years now has a criminal record and has demonstrated a total disregard for the law and for law enforcement officers.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Prosecutorial discretion suggests that the government prosecuting attorneys have the opportunity to choose to bring criminal charges and any other charges. Prosecutors are one of the most powerful officials, which, “also provides a significant opportunity for leniency and mercy in a system that is frequently marked by broad and harsh criminal laws, and, increasingly in the last decades of the twentieth century, by legislative limitations on judges ' sentencing discretion.” The prosecutor has a great amount of authority, stated in the case Bordenkircher v. Hayes, “ as long as the prosecutor has probable cause to believe that the accused committed an offense defined by statue, the decision whether or not to prosecute, and what charge to file or bring before…

    • 1403 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Morgan EN100-27 October 9th, 2015 Dr. Bloom Just Justice: Is a fair trial really fair? In the article, 5 Ways America's Justice System is designed to Screw You posted to Cracked.com on January 28, 2015, by Talia Jane states that there are several ways that the American justice system is set up to fail you. Ms. Jane, a professional writer along with an anonymous expert source, that she claims is a former public defender who wished to go unnamed, says that without proper representation the cards are stacked against the unfortunate person that can’t afford such representation. In this essay, we’ll go over those 5 reasons and determine how valid they are.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Eleventh Amendment

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Judiciary Can’t Have Too Much Power The Eleventh Amendment to the Constitution, changed a portion of Article III, Section II of the U.S. Constitution. Even before ratification of the Constitution anti-federalists worried that Article III, Section II would interfere with the sovereignty of the individual states. The original Article stated that: the judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made under their authority; to cases between a State and Citizens of another State and between a State or the Citizens of it and foreign States. The anti-federalist believed this would allow the federal government to override the States right to not be subject to a suit without the States consent.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What was once an adversarial adjudicative process controlled by judges and juries has been reduced to an administrative mechanism dominated by prosecutors through the exercise of unbridled discretion. Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are not supposed to use their power to rack up guilty pleas or convictions, because they are not advocates for one side in an adversarial process; they are public officials charged with pursuing justice (Graham,…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The purpose of releasing a defendant on bond is to ensure that the defendant will make an appearance later on to continue the criminal justice process (Bohm & Haley, 2014). The setting of a bond allows defendants to be released to continue their day to day life but return at a later date to finish their case. Bond setting is a right that some defendants have under the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution, it is not guaranteed (Bohm & Haley, 2014). In this scenario, I believe that the judge did have a right to release Danielle on bond. Both of her offenses were felonies, but they were not considered violent crimes.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Prosecution In this case, the prosecutor can argue that the accused wife gave verbal consent to the police officers to search the resident, without the officers having to obtained a search warrant, and the police had significant probable cause to be at the resident. The prosecutor can argue that the consent from the accused wife was sufficient enough to search the resident, since she was a co-occupant of the resident. The prosecutor could argue that a warrant-less search conducted in the absence of probable cause is valid when one occupant give permission for the search, even if the other occupant objects by siting the case United States v. Matlock, when the United States Supreme Court ruled that the police can obtain consent for a search from a third party, if the third party has common authority over the premises (United States v. Matlock). The Courts have knowledge and understanding that during such instance situations can change quickly and because of this, police officers do not have time to wait for a warrant.…

    • 497 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays