Summary Of Just Justice Is A Fair Trial Truly Fair

Improved Essays
William Morgan
EN100-27
October 9th, 2015
Dr. Bloom

Just Justice: Is a fair trial really fair?

In the article, 5 Ways America's Justice System is designed to Screw You posted to Cracked.com on January 28, 2015, by Talia Jane states that there are several ways that the American justice system is set up to fail you. Ms. Jane, a professional writer along with an anonymous expert source, that she claims is a former public defender who wished to go unnamed, says that without proper representation the cards are stacked against the unfortunate person that can’t afford such representation. In this essay, we’ll go over those 5 reasons and determine how valid they are.
First off, they bring up that The Judges are biased against you. The Judge is a
…show more content…
According to Lane’s source, prosecutors have been known to withhold evidence that favors the defense and have even entreated police to lie on the witnesses stand. Prosecutors, like Judges, are typically employed by an office of the government, so they too can have extra incentive to win their cases which may lead to unfair tactics to get a conviction. Some have even made misleading and inflammatory remarks to the media in regards to defendants of a case in order to get public demand of a certain outcome in a trial, which in turn may lead to a judge to come to a decision favoring the prosecution. This point, while it may have some merit, without proof is circumstantial at best. Once again, the author is trying to make a point using a situation that may or may not …show more content…
It isn’t uncommon for a New York Public Defender to work three to five times as many cases then they supposed to be expected to handle in a year. That’s about 500 to 800 cases a year. This, of course, doesn’t hinder the prosecution from pursuing these cases. Very few of said cases actually go to trial due to these large amounts of plea bargains. If the public defender has more than they can handle that often leads to a high amount of plea bargains or extended jail time for defendants awaiting trial. While these numbers seem like they could be realistic, without any reference source there is no way to validate them. Therefore, this information is merely conjecture and has no real

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In the judgement of Mason CJ and McHugh J, it was said that a “ trial judge who is faced with an application for an adjournment or a stay by an indigent accused charged with a serious offence [...] the trial in such a case should be adjourned, postponed or stayed until legal representation is available. The judgement also stated that “an accused has the right to a fair trial and that, depending on all the circumstances of the particular case, lack of representation may mean that an accused is unable to receive, or did not receive, a fair trial. “ Moreover, the judgement of Deane and Gaudron suggested that the right to receive counsel was found in the Constitution, specifically Chapter Three which requires that ‘judicial process and fairness be observed.’ However, both Justice Brennan and Justice Dawson dissented, stating that it would unjust for judges to adjourn or stay trial due to the pressures it would place on legal aid agencies. For Dietrich, the outcome of the High Court case meant that without the legal representation he had required for the trial and due to the trial judge’s failure to grant an adjournment, a miscarriage of justice had occurred.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The concept of legal competence to stand trial in the United States can be traced back to English common law dating from at least the 17th century (Zapf and Roesch 4). It was not until the 1960s that the United States established the modern day standard for determining competence to stand trial with the Supreme Court case of Dusky v United States (Zapf and Roesch 6). This case established that a “defendant must have sufficient present ability to consult with a lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding, as well as factual understanding of the proceeding” in order to be considered psychologically qualified to stand trial (Zapf and Roesch 7). This baseline for determining competence for trial formed the foundation for determining competence for execution in the Ford v Wainwright…

    • 1987 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    INTRODUCTION Appellate litigation has played a major role in the development and progress of the Unite States. One case in particular, Gideon v. Wainwright, stands out to me as it has been one of the many motivating factors in my decision to purse of law degree. Gideon v. Wainwright, a case involving an indigent man by the name Clarence Gideon, who was denied counsel. This case not only changed America when the supreme court ruled the government must provide free counsel to accused criminals who cannot afford counsel for themselves, but this case as also had a huge impact on my family life and in my decision making when it came to my career path. GIDEON V. WAINWRIGHT Clarence Gideon was charged with breaking an entry into a pool hall in Florida.…

    • 516 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anthony Guerra SC 240 Dr. Clark 11/17/17 Chasing Gideon In the text, Chasing Gideon by Karen Houppert she explains about the fundamental flaws in the way we provide legal representation to the poor in America. Houppert goes on to clarify how people are often distorted or undersold. She brings up evidence about how defense attorneys are seriously mistreated. They are mistreated because they are underfunded and understaffed. This results in a large workload that would make the top attorneys break down under certain scenarios, which then ultimately reflects in the quality of council that an blamed person is given.…

    • 1894 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Concurrences and Dissents: Concurrence: Justice Goldberg begins by contradicting Justice Stewart’s argument that there is no right to privacy written in the Bill of Rights or established by previous cases, stating that the Court has “never held that the Bill of Rights of the Fourteenth Amendment protects only those rights that the Constitution specifically mentions by name.” In fact, the equal protection clause was not explicitly stated the Constitution, but was derived from the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment (Boiling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. at 499, 74 S.Ct. at 694). The Court also emphasizes that the Due Process Clause protects certain rights that are “fundamental” to our notions of order and liberty.…

    • 1585 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    more likely as use of weapons, and the victim being young as well as it being a relative or acquaintance or intimate partner and if an injury was involved. Using a weapon and injury makes this crime a more violent and serious offense that could get prosecuted to the highest level. When young victims are involved can also be a reason that the charges may be increased and the seriousness of the case increased so it is expected theses cases would be more willing to be practiced. The one that does not go along with common belief is if it was an intimate partner or acquaintance. Being intimate partner or aquatic takes away the stranger danger belief that many people fear.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rashawn Smith 10 page research paper English 12th grade Do you believe black on black crime is a result of a race-biased criminal justice system? Or does it have more to do with genetics? The Black Lives Matter movement in some eyes is a racist movement. People believe that those who are involved in the movement are selfish because they blame everything on the criminal justice system and take no responsibility.…

    • 1661 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    The ‘trial of the century’ changed many Americans’ views on race. While race is the most notable impact and influence associated with the Simpson trial, the highly popularized case brought more transformations than creating a major race controversy. The trials multi-faceted ideas and themes, including media coverage, criminology, views on justice, and domestic abuse, impacted American culture as well. The O.J. Simpson trial had a long-term impact that went further than racial tensions to ultimately change the media, change perception of the justice system, promote better job performance, and to raise awareness of domestic abuse.…

    • 1614 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to figures founded by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, between 1993 and 2011, defendants heard in the Supreme Court were acquitted of all charges in 55.4% of judge-alone trials compared with 29% of jury trials. Professor Mark Findlay of criminal justice at Sydney University accredits these exonerations to judges being less likely to be guided by emotion whilst jury members could approach the case subjectively thus hindering the presumption of innocence. Furthermore, juries are becoming increasingly more influenced by social media reports and coverage, risking the procedure of a fair trial and including the possibility of the trial being aborted. The issue of “trial by social media”, recently gaining national attention following the high-profile murder case of Jill Meagher (2012), compromises the accused presumption of innocence and transfers the burden of proof from the prosecution to the defendant. The courts have deemed maintaining the balance of publicity and…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In America today, we face several problems with our judicial system. Our judicial system sometimes is not fair to people when it comes to their acts and crimes they have committed. For example, a person could murder someone and have less time in prison than someone who were trafficking drugs. This is not fair at all. The court systems today need to look at where people are coming from.…

    • 968 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Unjust Criminal Trial

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages

    For instance, a person who violates the law is charged with a criminal offence. If a person committed a more serious crime, perchance kidnapped a person or robbed a bank, she or he is locked into a prison until a trail is held. The courts determine and regulate what is right and wrong, justice and unjust, and normal and abnormal, to convict those who are guilty.…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Brothel Boy Case Study

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The prosecutors are considered to be the most influential actors within the courthouse, as they decide which case to prosecute, the cases to plea-bargain, and the case to try. The prosecutor may also influence the factors of setting bail and creating the sentence. In the United States Constitution, one’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel is granted as many defendants cannot afford to hire a lawyer, they are provided a public defender also known as the defense attorney. The defense attorneys encourage their clients to think about how the jury will assess them as guilty beyond reasonable doubt, therefore most will plead guilt. The judge plays a major authority role in the criminal justice system whether it is in state courts, or larger courts.…

    • 1251 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unfair Justice System

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages

    American’s prisons today have plenty of convicted felonies for criminal reasons. Some may say they deserve it. Some may question it. Prisons have more innocent prisoners then their needs to be. Innocent people are sent to jail every day because of the United States court system, fails to do the right judgment.…

    • 1579 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jon B. Gould, J.D., Ph.D., a professor and the director of the Washington Institute for Public and International Affairs Research at American University and his team of researchers conducted a three year, first of its kind, large-scale empirical study Predicting Erroneous Convictions: A Social Science Approach to Miscarriages of Justice employing social scientific methods. It was funded by NIJ, and an NIJ video features Gould discussing wrongful convictions. After identifying 460 cases employing sophisticated analytical methods matched with a qualitative review of the cases from a panel of experts, 10 statistically significant factors were identified that distinguish a wrongful conviction from a “near miss” (a case in which an innocent defendant was acquitted or had charges dismissed before trial) NIJ…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The prompt for King’s letter goal is to compare and contrast Letter from a Birmingham Jail and Handbook of Epictetus. One section of King’s letter dealt with the issue of just and unjust laws and how direct action would effect the outcome. King and Epictetus had two different ways of dealing with unjust laws and the effect of them on an individual person. Their thoughts are similar but not similar enough that one could come to the conclusion that they would both agree. Even though they would not be able to agree, both of their solutions can be used together to form a peaceful solution.…

    • 1414 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics