Prosecution's Office At Work Case Study

Great Essays
Prosecutors.
1. The text discusses the prosecutor’s office at work. From the tape, cite some examples of work issues related in the text. The prosecution office at work was a method used by the prosecution team to highlight certain photos and children’s accounts about alleged sexual abuse at the McMartin preschool to gather more evidence to convince the jury that defendant Ray Buckey was a sexual deviant, and that his family was guilty of similar actions. There are several examples or prosecution at work: the prosecution team using photos of the McMartin family with the alleged victims, the photo of a woman receiving oral sex kept by Buckey beside his bedroom window, and the interviews of different children about their stories involving devil worshipping at the McMartin preschool.

2. How does discretion fit
…show more content…
How can the needs of the victim be reconciled with the concept of due process for the defendant (How can the needs of both the victim and the defendant be addressed within the same justice system)?
I personally think it’s impossible because some groups are going to feel differently about different cases involving surprising elements, such as child molestation charges or murder charge. McMartin family was guilty as charged without ever looking at the facts of the case.
While I do believe the concept of due process is important to our justice system, there are some powerful individuals who in high positions who can manipulate the justice system in their favor.

4. In your opinion, how (specifically) was the presumption of innocence violated in this case?
In my opinion, the presumption of innocence violated in this case was not a concern for anybody that was involved in this case because the main goal for the prosecution team was to convince the jury that Ray Buckey was a sexual predator and his family was aware of his behavior. But, I think one thing that attorney Davis showed us is that alleged victims are not always credible to a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Murder on a Sunday Morning is a documentary that shows the problem in our judicial system concerning the juvenile being accused of a crime. This documentary follows the trial of 15-year-old Brendon Butler from Defense attorney Patrick McGuinness’s and Ann Finnell point of view as he works to prove Butler innocence. This case became America most misleading Cassie's because of its lack of evidence on Mr Butler Butler. This accident took place on May 17, 2000, out of Jacksonville Florida many people say that this case was not handled properly by detective and officers could also represent that the young black teen time to be a stereotype base under skin colour.…

    • 533 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case name: Rankin v. McPherson, 483 U.S. 378 (1987) Facts: Ardith McPherson was appointed a deputy in the Constable’s office of Harris County, Texas, on January 12, 1981. Her duties were only clerical. On March 30, 1981, McPherson discussed with her boyfriend, and fellow employee, a report about an attempt to assassinate the President of the United States. She made the remark “If they go for him again, I hope they get him”. Her remark was reported to Constable Rankin, who fired McPherson, even though she told him she did not mean anything by it.…

    • 983 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the court case The People of the State of Colorado v. Sandra L. Jacobson, Jacobson is convicted of homicide. The homicide resulted from her truck colliding with a taxi cab while she was driving under the influence. There were two passengers in the taxi at the time of the collision and both were killed. Jacobson appealed the court’s decision on the basis that the trial court did not allow her attorneys to gauge whether or not the jury had become biased due to mid-trial publicity that included inadmissible information. On the fourth day of the trial, the Court was made aware of the fact that a local television network would be covering the incident that led to this trial on its evening news program.…

    • 500 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Betts V. Brady case which is overruled because of the refusal to appoint counsel for an indigent defendant charged with a felony in a state court did not violate the due process. So in…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Additionally, in this trial, the implications of an elected versus appointed judge can be seen. Judge Horton did the right thing by overturning the conviction of Haywood Patterson, he did so at great risk. Horton, an elected judge, basically ended his career with this move. It is this situation that leads me to believe that judges should be appointed rather than elected. Not every judge, especially when put in a situation like this, would have the integrity to ignore the political ramifications of their decision.…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    R. V. Keegstra Case Study

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages

    These considerations suggest that section 319 (3) (a)'s encroachment of the assumption of innocence is neither minimal nor, given the essentials of the encroachment in the connection of prosecutions under section 319 (2), sufficient to exceed the questionable benefit of such a procurement. Judge McLachlin at the end of her statements, makes a conclusion “that s.(section) 319(3)(a) is not saved by s.(section) 1 of the Charter…

    • 2146 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    GIDEON v. WAINWRIGHT CITATION: 372 U.S. 335 (1963) FACTS: In the state court of Florida, Gideon was accused of breaking and entering. Gideon is so poor that he has no money to hire a lawyer. So he asked the justice to appoint a lawyer for him.…

    • 880 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Gregg v. Georgia starts with a man named Troy Gregg. Troy was imprisoned by the state of Georgia after he was found guilty of armed robbery and murdering two people in 1973. Following Gregg’s trial, the jury found Tory Gregg guilty and sentenced him to death. Troy challenged his remaining death sentence for murder, asked for an appeal, and claimed that his capital sentence was cruel and unusual punishment, in violation of the 8th amendment. The Georgia state court ruled that the death penalty was for murder.…

    • 1040 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Probable Cause Case

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In reference to the Constitution of the United States of America, the Fourth Amendment is set to protect the American citizen from unlawful searches and seizures (Samaha, 223). According to this statement and how such relates to the presence of Law Enforcement in our daily lives; officers must have probable cause if they intend to investigate an individual for a particular reason. Probable Cause states that the particular officer(s), must have factual evidence that a crime is being or is about to be committed before he or she investigates a person (Samaha, 225). With the numerous incidents that have involved Law Enforcement officers performing unlawful searches, and utilizing things such as excessive force to subdue a suspect, the trust of the community in these government officials has been on the decline. Luckily perhaps, the…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To great surprise the jury convicted Evans and Terry based on only one piece of evidence, the discredited testimony of Januszewski. This sheds light on a potential problem with our jury system in the U.S. Similar to what was described in the podcast The Life of the Law: Episode 1, The Secret Power of Jury Nullification, when juries decided the innocence of people who were clearly guilty, allowing them to avoid possibly unnecessary sentences (Heffernan, 2012). The jury in this case used their power to do the almost exact opposite. The jury’s thirst to find the people responsible for such a heinous crime in their community may have enticed them to convict the two boys with minimal evidence, promoting a sense of closure for the victims’ families and the community. Juries may also feel pressures of a community to swiftly close a case which could easily result in these wrongful convictions.…

    • 998 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The principle of Due Process must be applied equally to all citizens accused of any crime. The U.S. Constitution states the government shall not deny any citizens of “life, liberty, or property, without due process of law…” (American Government, 2016). This phrase is used in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment, which protect the citizens against actions of the federal government and actions against the state and local governments. (American Government, 2016)…

    • 1229 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Juvenile Court System

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The United States juvenile court system has come a long way throughout the years. There has been many significant cases in the juvenile system that set the standard for what the system is now. Cases such as Kent vs. United States, In re Gault, and In re Winship are examples of major cases that challenged state rulings and later changed the technicalities of future, similar cases because they called upon the Supreme Court to change or state the rules. These three cases built some of the framework on what the juvenile justice system is today.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Retrieved from The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/09/29/nyregion/joyce-mitchell-ex-prison-employee-is-sentenced.html?_r=0 Sexual Misconduct in Prisons: Laws, Remidies and Incidence. (2000). Special Issues in Corrections, 1-14. Wagner, P. (2016, January 14). State of Colorado Judicial Ethics. (M. Hall,…

    • 1349 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For Gould this was the most surprising result of his research because he and his team expected strong prosecutorial cases to result in wrongful convictions since the evidence was compelling for the prosecutor to seek conviction but instead the study revealed the contrary. This led the team to look at weak defense counsel, poor explanation/presentation of forensic evidence, and police practices that could trigger the course of events spiraling out of control to a wrongful conviction because the weak prosecution case in turn is not adequately challenged by the defense attorney and the prosecution for one reason or the other may fail to disclose exculpatory evidence- a Brady violation (NIJ…

    • 2703 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To what extent is 12 Angry Men a critique of the legal system? The 1957 film, 12 Angry Men, revolves around the discussion in a courtroom regarding the alleged killing of a Hispanic boy’s father. Reginald Rose, through some of his characters, showcases the flaws in the legal system and how prejudice influences the men’s decisions. The film shows the racist, personal biases that sway the decisions of the men, as well as the un-cooperation between the jurors.…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays