Solutions Outline
P1: (Introduction) Hook: People’s information’s are being shared to everyone it seems there’s not much we can do about it.
Thesis: However, both articles, “How Should We Think About Privacy” and “Privacy Pragmatism”, provide solutions to keeping our privacy safe within the boundaries of our personal lives.
BODY: Lanier sees privacy where power and information as the most important tool in keeping your data. On the other hand, Mundie, author of “Privacy Pragmatism”, provides a solution which allows people to put their trust into an organization that would keep track of his preferences. Her article introduces the wrapper concept where all electronic data would be kept in a “wrapper” metadata without revealing its content. …show more content…
In addition , they would be penalized if wrongfully taking information. The wrapper concept installs a demand for authority, not from corporations, but from the people.
P9: Lanier vs. Corp.
TOPIC: Lanier’s approach would put customers in control over corporations.
Body: There would be the ability to deny requests from large corporations. This would also affect the corporations’ ability to predict and sell. Because of the lack of information they are allowed access, corporations would be most affected if customers were to put a price tag on their information. Because the NSA allows corporations to pry into the public’s information, putting a lock on the information would make the corps. lose power over its customers.
P10: Mundie vs. Corp.
TOPIC: If government were to use Mundie’s wrapper program, they would be affected adjust as much as a …show more content…
Body: He understands the nature of society and how people wold much rather be assured by a company they trust about the isolation of their data in only one corporation. Lanier presents a solution where you would be bargaining the price of your privacy, a first come first first serve basis of which company, corporation, or government would be pounding down asking for one’s information. Lanier’s user’s would soon find the influx of corporations asking permission to buy your personal information. One would later become tired of the constant bombardment. The option of using a wrapper to protect privacy proves to be more realistically possible in keeping ones data safe.
P13: Conclusion
Can people’s privacy be kept in this technology age where governments and corporations manage to break through those boundaries? Both Mundie and Lanier prove that it is with two possible solutions, monetizing one’s own personal information and protection information by incasing it in a “wrapper”. The idea of putting one’s information into a wrapper seems more doable in keeping one’s privacy. In doing so, a person would be in control of their own data. Lanier’s presents a solution that would be unable to perform due to the amount of care each person would have to take in order to keep their data
P1: (Introduction) Hook: People’s information’s are being shared to everyone it seems there’s not much we can do about it.
Thesis: However, both articles, “How Should We Think About Privacy” and “Privacy Pragmatism”, provide solutions to keeping our privacy safe within the boundaries of our personal lives.
BODY: Lanier sees privacy where power and information as the most important tool in keeping your data. On the other hand, Mundie, author of “Privacy Pragmatism”, provides a solution which allows people to put their trust into an organization that would keep track of his preferences. Her article introduces the wrapper concept where all electronic data would be kept in a “wrapper” metadata without revealing its content. …show more content…
In addition , they would be penalized if wrongfully taking information. The wrapper concept installs a demand for authority, not from corporations, but from the people.
P9: Lanier vs. Corp.
TOPIC: Lanier’s approach would put customers in control over corporations.
Body: There would be the ability to deny requests from large corporations. This would also affect the corporations’ ability to predict and sell. Because of the lack of information they are allowed access, corporations would be most affected if customers were to put a price tag on their information. Because the NSA allows corporations to pry into the public’s information, putting a lock on the information would make the corps. lose power over its customers.
P10: Mundie vs. Corp.
TOPIC: If government were to use Mundie’s wrapper program, they would be affected adjust as much as a …show more content…
Body: He understands the nature of society and how people wold much rather be assured by a company they trust about the isolation of their data in only one corporation. Lanier presents a solution where you would be bargaining the price of your privacy, a first come first first serve basis of which company, corporation, or government would be pounding down asking for one’s information. Lanier’s user’s would soon find the influx of corporations asking permission to buy your personal information. One would later become tired of the constant bombardment. The option of using a wrapper to protect privacy proves to be more realistically possible in keeping ones data safe.
P13: Conclusion
Can people’s privacy be kept in this technology age where governments and corporations manage to break through those boundaries? Both Mundie and Lanier prove that it is with two possible solutions, monetizing one’s own personal information and protection information by incasing it in a “wrapper”. The idea of putting one’s information into a wrapper seems more doable in keeping one’s privacy. In doing so, a person would be in control of their own data. Lanier’s presents a solution that would be unable to perform due to the amount of care each person would have to take in order to keep their data