Plato 's Views On Art Essay
Among major classical philosophers Plato’s views on art seem to be extremely contradictory. Being an artist himself, who wrote decent pieces of literature in his dialogues, and started as a writer and dramatist himself, he used to denounce all main types of art such as drama, literature, fine arts and music, that is to say all that were taking after the real life. The philosopher argues that the imitative arts are deprived both moral and cognitive merit. Overall, there are two conceptual views in this respect which may be traced in his writing. According to the first one art is a mere imitation of the reality, whereas the second concept adheres to the position that even being a copy art is a form to express an improved reality, which is an instrument for the man’s fulfillment of his moral duties. The theory of Plato may not seem overall convincing. With the given arguments in view, it is rational to analyze the Plato’s criticism towards the value of art, and find all the ins and outs of Plato’s concept of the superfluous nature of art.
Plato’s argument’s proving the lack of moral and cognitive value in arts
The first theory, which is generally disapproving of art is comprised in Plato’s famous dialogue “The Republic” and the second is to be found in such dialogues as “Ion” and “Symposium” ("Aesthetics - Plato 's Aesthetics"). There are indeed numerous debates within scholars on this issue. Some commentator’s of Plato’s work believe that he truly condemned art,…