Two separate spreadsheets were created to interpret the two different trials for the two different Planaria tested. After, the values were translated into graphs in order to get visual perspective on the results. As observed the trials the Planarian was the slowest under the natural light of the microscope (control), was a bit faster under the violent light which had the highest frequency, a bit faster under the green light with the intermediate frequency, and the fastest under the red light which had the lowest frequency. These results can be observed in attached figures 1 and 2, respectively serving as trial 1 and 2 with the two different Planaria specimens. The data was then converted into averages through use of the ANOVA spreadsheet. This resulted in the control (3.92, 4.37), violet (3.74, 3.95), green (3.73, 3.76), and red (2.83, 3.69) measured in seconds across the 4.5 mm field diameter. The two sets of numbers represent trial 1 and then trial 2. These averages can be observed in attached figure
Two separate spreadsheets were created to interpret the two different trials for the two different Planaria tested. After, the values were translated into graphs in order to get visual perspective on the results. As observed the trials the Planarian was the slowest under the natural light of the microscope (control), was a bit faster under the violent light which had the highest frequency, a bit faster under the green light with the intermediate frequency, and the fastest under the red light which had the lowest frequency. These results can be observed in attached figures 1 and 2, respectively serving as trial 1 and 2 with the two different Planaria specimens. The data was then converted into averages through use of the ANOVA spreadsheet. This resulted in the control (3.92, 4.37), violet (3.74, 3.95), green (3.73, 3.76), and red (2.83, 3.69) measured in seconds across the 4.5 mm field diameter. The two sets of numbers represent trial 1 and then trial 2. These averages can be observed in attached figure