Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the intentional termination of a human 's life, at the explicit request of the one who dies, with the aid of a physician. Should a person have the right to take another person 's life or his own when he/she is incurably ill and in pain? There are many things that go along with assisted suicide more than just why it should or should not be legal.
PAS is legal in five U.S. states, California, Vermont, Oregon, Washington, in these states it is mandated by state law but in Montana, it is mandated by court ruling. Individuals are required to have a terminal illness as well as a prediction of six or less months to live. Doctors cannot be accused for prescribing medication to hurry the death.
There are different …show more content…
There are two different kinds of euthanasia, one being active euthanasia and the other passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the active acceleration of a "good" death by use of drugs etc., whether by oneself or with the aid of a doctor. Passive euthanasia is a form of euthanasia in which medical treatment that will keep a dying patient alive for a time is withdrawn. On the other hand, physician-assisted suicide is the suicide of somebody with an incurable disease carried out with the help of a …show more content…
Physician-assisted suicide is frequently related to Dr. Kevorkian also known as “doctor death”. He thinks that he is a hero to all of his patients, which is at least 45 that were recorded. He said that physicians that do not agree with PAS are like Nazis enjoying to see their patients suffer. A doctor’s duty is to be with their patient all the way through a hard time, even if they are technically in the process of dying. So should a doctor really have the right to fasten that process? Another form of PAS has to do with babies. If a baby is born with a birth severe birth defect should the parents be able to put the child to sleep?
In the constitution, the Due Process Law deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law. Therefore, people can argue that it is unconstitutional for physician-assisted suicide to be legal. It could be considered unconstitutional because the Due Process Law pretty much just states that one has the right to
PAS is legal in five U.S. states, California, Vermont, Oregon, Washington, in these states it is mandated by state law but in Montana, it is mandated by court ruling. Individuals are required to have a terminal illness as well as a prediction of six or less months to live. Doctors cannot be accused for prescribing medication to hurry the death.
There are different …show more content…
There are two different kinds of euthanasia, one being active euthanasia and the other passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia is the active acceleration of a "good" death by use of drugs etc., whether by oneself or with the aid of a doctor. Passive euthanasia is a form of euthanasia in which medical treatment that will keep a dying patient alive for a time is withdrawn. On the other hand, physician-assisted suicide is the suicide of somebody with an incurable disease carried out with the help of a …show more content…
Physician-assisted suicide is frequently related to Dr. Kevorkian also known as “doctor death”. He thinks that he is a hero to all of his patients, which is at least 45 that were recorded. He said that physicians that do not agree with PAS are like Nazis enjoying to see their patients suffer. A doctor’s duty is to be with their patient all the way through a hard time, even if they are technically in the process of dying. So should a doctor really have the right to fasten that process? Another form of PAS has to do with babies. If a baby is born with a birth severe birth defect should the parents be able to put the child to sleep?
In the constitution, the Due Process Law deals with the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the Government outside the sanction of law. Therefore, people can argue that it is unconstitutional for physician-assisted suicide to be legal. It could be considered unconstitutional because the Due Process Law pretty much just states that one has the right to