Criminals Deserve To Get The Death Penalty

Improved Essays
Guilty! The one word that no criminal wants to hear. When it comes to being guilty of a heinous crime, capital punishment should come into effect. There are criminals that deserve to get the death penalty. Individuals that commit certain crimes such as rape and murder should be punished severely. Taking another human being’s life should result in that person being put to death. Capital punishment would give the victim’s family a sense of justice, make spending productive, and reduce heinous crimes. First, enforcing capital punishment would give the victim’s family a sense of justice. The family would feel a sense of peace, knowing that the person that killed their loved one is not being clothed, housed, and feed with their tax dollars. Capital punishment would not bring their loved ones back, but could give the family a small amount of retribution. Family, and friends would have a feeling of …show more content…
Realizing that committing a heinous crime would result in a guilty verdict, and punishment would be death, could hinder certain actions. An individual would be forced to consider the consequences of what their actions would bring upon them. Witnessing criminals of heinous crimes no longer be put in prison, where they are clothed, and feed, but put to death, would deter many from killing. Criminals, like everyone else, fear death and therefore would be discouraged from committing an atrocious crime. Reducing the amount of heinous crimes would intern make citizens more safe. There are some who are opposed to capital punishment. However, according to Jeff Jacob, author of Life and Death in New Jersey, “a widening sheaf of studies (some by scholars who personally oppose the death penalty) have found that each time a murderer is executed, between 3 and 18 additional homicides are deterred” (14). Confirming that capital punishment has a positive affect on decreasing reprehensible

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Article Summary #1: Author William Tucker uses his 2000 American Spectator article to explain why the death penalty is actually a deterrent to criminals. Tucker analyzes the statistics of crime over the years and concludes that when death penalty rates are up, murder rates are down, and when execution rates decrease, the rate of homicides rises (par. 13). While many criminologists believe that the death penalty doesn’t affect the amount of murders that take place in America, Tucker counters by saying, “The results are plain to see. Beginning at almost the exact point when executions ended, murder soared to unprecedented heights.…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In other words, the severity of the death penalty will make criminals want to avoid it. However, the statistics tell a different story. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the rates of murder, one of the most common violent crimes in the U.S., are higher in states using capital punishment than the ones that aren’t (Deterrence). While the general trend of murder rates has been a downwards one, there’s still a significant percentage difference in the statistics (peak difference was 46% in 2005). This evidence shows that the idea that capital punishment is a deterrent is false.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Haag, a sociologist, wrote an extensive explanation on why the death penalty would help deter criminals from committing crimes. He has stated that the death penalty may be the only way to keep some people from committing crimes. He has said that this will help reduce the number of victims to crimes such as murder and rape. Haag also feels that if the punishments for a crime is raised then the desire to commit a crime is quickly diminished. I agree with Haag.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Having individuals that can testify against the false avocation that the death penalty is used to punish those truly guilty for their crimes because it displays the extreme used in the wrong instance through its ruling on the innocent. Capital punishment’s inefficiency shines through the innocents’ conviction because how is providing the wrongful ruling suppose to deter future crime it only works to diminish the public’s trust in the judicial system and the validness of the death penalty ruling. Along with innocent men speaking out against capital punishment, comes the costly and time-consuming misconception that the act of evolving the death penalty has made it more humane even though despite popular belief “the death penalty has not become more civilized with the passage of time” (Stroud III, 381). We an human beings can’t continue to turn a blind eye towards the fact that no matter how the executors of the death penalty make it look it is still the blatant taking of another’s life whether it be with a rope, a chair or lethal doses of drugs. Another reason that both Stroud and myself see as being worth ending the option of capital punishment judicial decision is the appalling conditions that create “an environment conducive to depression and hopelessness” for its inmates (Stroud, 383).…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    That means, if the person kills others, they should killed too. Based on this concept, if the judge found the defendant guilty, they isolate the criminal forever from the society by depriving their life. Currently (October, 2014) the death sentence is practiced by 64 nations. This essay will…

    • 1077 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My first point is that many people have been wrongfully convicted and killed for crimes they didn’t commit. This causes more drama in people and has the ability to harm one or more person. By eliminating the death penalty this won't be an issue in the U.S. It is also important that currently, the state of Texas has over 250 people on the death row, according to DeathPenaltyIssues.com. That is a lot of people that will be negatively impacted. How do the state officials Know that some of they didn’t commit the crimes that they were accused of?…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Pro and Con Arguments for the Death Penalty The death penalty, to some it is known as the grimmest way to die, but to others it is considered the savior or protector to humanity. This argument is one of the many buzzing all over America’s juries and even social media. Unequivocally, many citizens of the United States have discrepant accounts on the topic of the pros and cons of our nation’s death penalty. Opponents of this argument may assert that the capital punishment is inhumane, unfair to ‘perpetrators’ who are innocent, and that it is malevolent to put mentally ill ‘victims’ on death row. However, advocates of this disputation may refute that if the death penalty is rescind, then crime rates will increase, more lives will be in danger, and that the deterrent effect won’t be as sufficient.…

    • 1219 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Even though many countries abolished the death penalty from their law, there is still quite a few that still practices the act of killing a person convicted of a crime. People have numerous different opinions relating to the issue of the death penalty that is given to a convict. While some may think that the death penalty is necessary for those who have committed a terrible crime, there are others who consider it as an immoral act that goes against the values of humanity. According to the author William Wood, in his text “Capital Punishment/Death Penalty,” there are generally two arguments that suggest capital punishment is an effective way to save lives and deter numerous crimes. Also, it plays a major role in giving justice to victims.…

    • 1628 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the death penalty argument emphasizes its deterrence effect. If the death penalty were truly a deterrent, then the homicide rates in the United States would be sitting near zero. A team of researchers analyzing panel studies concluded that “recent panel literature on whether there is a deterrent effect of the death penalty to be inconclusive as a whole and in many cases uninformative” (Chalfin, Haviland and Raphael). The…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civilized Death Penalty

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to a survey of the former and present presidents of the country’s top academic criminological societies, eighty-eight percent of these experts rejected the notion that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to murder (Radelet & Lacock, 2009). If somebody commits intentional murder, odds are, they don’t consider, or even care for, the consequences they will have to eventually face when he or she is caught. Another opposing argument may state that somebody guilty of such a monstrous act as murder deserves nothing less than capital punishment in order to ensure the safety of the public. This may be a fair argument; however, what about in the case that an innocent person is mistakenly found guilty? Would those same people be just as content with the knowledge of the innocent blood on their hands?…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Retentionists showed three major standpoints that advocate capital punishment. They believe that it “deters the future crimes” with heinous offenses. One of them is David Muhlhausen, who is an expert on criminal justice programs in the Heritage Foundation's Center for data analysis. In article “The Death Penalty Deters Crime”, Muhlhausen points out that the strong correlations between execution and murder rate: “the more executions there are, the lower the murder rate is, and the rate is even lower when executions are carried out quickly after sentencing.” He then explained the reasons why capital punishment minimizes the murder rate.…

    • 217 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unjust Death Penalty

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Society has the job of keeping an order in delivering each person what he deserves. Above all, crime disturbs this just order, for a criminal takes from citizens their God given rights such as life, liberties and the pursuit of happiness. Suitable punishment protects society righteously by restoring this just order, making the violator pay a price equivalent to the harm he has done. Capital punishment is among these enforced punishments. Capital punishment is currently a legal penalty in the United States which is being used by 31 states and also the federal government.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Example Of Contradictions

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Contradictions are occurring in the United States between traditional and emerging values. An example of these contradictions is having the death penalty and abortion. Some Americans are claiming to be in favor of the death penalty yet strongly against abortion. Support for capital punishment is widely accepted among Americans. The classic “ eye for an eye “ is a top response in asking why the death penalty should be persuaded.…

    • 367 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Capital Punishments role in America plays a huge part in how America handles offenders and repeat offenders. Staticbrain.com reports that Time magazine says,” An estimated 2,000,000 people have been victims of crimes, from assault to murder. With insufficient laws to address these issues, criminals become careless and bolder. For this reason, there is a need for a death penalty.” Capital punishment, should not be abolished because, it takes committing a heinous act to receive the death penalty.…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Capital punishment should be abolished because it is too expensive to retain, it is revenge not justice, and it 's possible for innocent people to be executed. The execution of human life should not be something we advocate here in the United States, it’s sad that as a nation we preach peace while still executing our citizens. The millions of dollars being wasted on executions could be spent improving our criminal justice system, and in doing so, improve our country. Not only is the death penalty a waste of our hard earned tax dollars, but it also puts innocent lives at risk. Mistreated or mishandled evidence can easily put an innocent life on death row.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics