On Eating Animals Analysis

Amazing Essays
“On Eating Animals”
Contrary to what omnivores often think, whether or not to eat meat isn't only a matter of taste or personal preference. Due to its many implications spreading concerns of well being for humans, animals, and the environment it is, at its center, a question of ethics. In the article, “On Eating Animals” they work to defend, honor, and clean up the processes by which farm animals are raised to eat and eventually kill. The purpose of this essay is to undermine a general belief. This essay sets out an argument that purports to show, as well as any argument in ethics can show, that eating animals is a current ongoing controversy. There are two totally opposing views on this subject and in this paper I take a neutral stance while
…show more content…
In the United States, farm animals make up around 98 percent of all birds and mammals humans use, the rest being pets, victims of research and sport, or the ones held in zoos. Animal Rights: current debates and new directions, the factory farming industry has persuaded legislatures to amend criminal statutes that claimed to protect farm animals from cruelty so that they cannot be prosecuted for any farming practice that the industry itself determines as acceptable. As a result, in most of the United States, prosecutors, judges, and juries no longer have the power to determine whether or not farm animals are treated in an acceptable manner. Veterinarians have been known to report abuses against farm animals but it risks liabilities. For example, in 2011 independent journalist Will Potter wrote: "The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force has kept files on activists who expose animal welfare abuses on factory farms and recommended prosecuting them as terrorists." The FBI file, which was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, detailed activists' actions trespassing on farms to videotape abuses and suggested these actions violated the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. Obviously, most people aren't aware of the horror and pain we inflict on billions of birds and mammals in our meat factories annually. The more people continue to eat meat, the more the practice will be considered …show more content…
While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit. The modern animal rights movement has definitely impacted a range of concerns such as reducing the use of animals for furs and cosmetics testing, and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Veganism Vs Vegetarianism

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They’re food of course! Vegetarianism and veganism are wrong because meat is necessary for a human’s diet, it is costly and unethical to distribute vegetarian meals, and animals are on the earth for the benefit of humans and it is more than okay to eat them. Although vegetarian diets seem to be an enlightened idea to help the planet and ease suffering worldwide, this just isn’t true. The side effects of this decision outway and counteract the very issues that they try to solve as well as cause a multitude of other problems. A well known medical journal, WebMD, proves that purely vegetarian diets are harmful to all human bodies.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Vegan Diets Pros And Cons

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Thus veganism is a stand against animal cruelty and seeks to reduce such cruel practices by halting their consumption of animal products. Moreover vegans insist that eating meat is unhealthy, as several health issues have been related to meat consumption. The Vegan Society (n.d.) argues that health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases diabetes and cancer have been associated with the consumption of meats and that switching to veganism would help mitigate such diseases. Additionally Greger (2014) explains that meat proteins can cause autoimmune diseases, as it can irritate the immune system, which might lead to the development of auto immune diseases as the body get increasingly exposed to animal meat. Thus it is clear why vegans believe that eating meat in unhealthy.…

    • 1779 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    ’There is nothing wrong with rearing and killing animals for consumption ’. Eating animals involves many aspects that may not be morally right. Philosophers may take into account violated rights, interests, human interests vs animal interests, rights argument and virtue ethics. Eating animals poses mainly two problems- is it wrong in principle to raise and kill animals so that human beings can eat meat and fish or Does it stop being wrong if the process involved are carried out humanely? These are two important questions philosophers debate on.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Cruelty Report

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages

    For those who, themselves, are not necessarily invested in the topic of animals rights, an analogy that might spur action would be to think about the potential of their loved one being abused. Animals cruelty manifests itself in other animal/human interactions. It might be instructive to examine the facts about this in the food industry; for example, 90% of the chickens bred specifically for meat production live a short, painful life, unable to walk because of, in many cases, forced genetic mutations. Many animals are as well tortured for scientific experimentation or, even more simply, for “fashion” as is the case of the clothing industry to obtain animal fur and hides for coats and scarfs and leather belts, etc. (11 Facts About Animal Cruelty).…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Animal Welfare Act Essay

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages

    It is propose that way because of the symbolic meaning we put ourselves in with other species. We assume we are the alphas and the other animals as lower than us, regarding to the portrayal, we consume them because we are in control. The issues are exactly the same from the approach that activists oppose to why it stabilize us as a society. The movement is characterized as a social movement by the collective action it has gathered from the abolitionists and welfarism activists to change the treatment towards animals or none in captivity. People fight for the propositions of laws so it can benefit animals and at least tolerate the circumstances the animals have been put into.…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Throughout Eating Animals, Jonathan Foer illustrates all the different elements that go into the production of animal meat, showing different perspectives and emphasizing on the inhumane aspects. When consuming meats, people do not generally think about where that meat is coming from, but instead how good it tastes. They blind themselves from the diseases that meat could be carrying and the pain in which the animal probably endured, ignoring these facts for the sake of pleasure. Throughout a segment of Foer’s book, “Slices of Paradise/Pieces of Shit”, Foer provides his research on the different farming industries, the industries repercussions, and identifies the consumers of these products as those responsible to putting these inhumane ways…

    • 1119 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The first difference that might seem relevant is Fred tortures the puppies himself, whereas most Americans purchase and consume meat which have been tortured by others. In addition, if Fred had employed someone else to torture the puppies instead, we would not think of him any better for it. The second difference between Fred and many consumers of factory-raised meat is that many are unaware of the treatment of the animals. This difference can be settled by altering the initial challenge; if we condemn Fred for his crimes against the puppies for the improvement of his gustatory experiences, we should similarly condemn…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Norway, India, and Israel are all anti animal testing places. There are countries that are bearly looking into animal testing and realizing how cruel and unfair it is to test on animals and make them suffer. Places like the U.S, New Zealand, and Australia are all places late to act for animals and are in fact very popular hunting grounds. This means that people have license to kill and hunt not just for survival but for fun and entertainment. These countries are trying to set a ban for animal testing but haven’t really enforced it.…

    • 2329 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Taking part in “Meatless Monday” means a little responding to the problems that our world has faced. 2) By “Polarizing” is meant that mostly the decision to eat or not to at factory farmed meat, the meat that comprises 99 % of the meat available in the US’s supermarkets nowadays refers to ethic, to morality and sequentially is a controversial one. By “personal” side of his assertion Jonathan Foer meant that each individual have the right to decide by his own, being aware of conditions, animal’s suffering and consequences, whether to consume factory farmed meat or not. It is personal choice that matters, if these choices are made steadily. I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”.…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the 2014 British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) article, “Ethics Guide: Eating Animals,” it examines three different ethical perspectives – the rights argument, the consequential (utilitarian) argument, and the virtue argument – against the rearing and killing of animals for human consumption in layman’s terms primarily for the average contemporary reader in Anglo-American societies (such as Canada, the United States and the United Kingdom). Furthermore, the BBC, a leading worldwide media corporation, contends that the process of rearing, killing and eating animals is “morally wrong” or unjustifiable because these acts disregard the rights of the animal to live by its own interests. Its aim is to inform the reader of these perspectives so…

    • 1545 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays