On Eating Animals Analysis

Great Essays
“On Eating Animals”
Contrary to what omnivores often think, whether or not to eat meat isn't only a matter of taste or personal preference. Due to its many implications spreading concerns of well being for humans, animals, and the environment it is, at its center, a question of ethics. In the article, “On Eating Animals” they work to defend, honor, and clean up the processes by which farm animals are raised to eat and eventually kill. The purpose of this essay is to undermine a general belief. This essay sets out an argument that purports to show, as well as any argument in ethics can show, that eating animals is a current ongoing controversy. There are two totally opposing views on this subject and in this paper I take a neutral stance while
…show more content…
In the United States, farm animals make up around 98 percent of all birds and mammals humans use, the rest being pets, victims of research and sport, or the ones held in zoos. Animal Rights: current debates and new directions, the factory farming industry has persuaded legislatures to amend criminal statutes that claimed to protect farm animals from cruelty so that they cannot be prosecuted for any farming practice that the industry itself determines as acceptable. As a result, in most of the United States, prosecutors, judges, and juries no longer have the power to determine whether or not farm animals are treated in an acceptable manner. Veterinarians have been known to report abuses against farm animals but it risks liabilities. For example, in 2011 independent journalist Will Potter wrote: "The FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force has kept files on activists who expose animal welfare abuses on factory farms and recommended prosecuting them as terrorists." The FBI file, which was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, detailed activists' actions trespassing on farms to videotape abuses and suggested these actions violated the Animal Enterprise Terrorism Act. Obviously, most people aren't aware of the horror and pain we inflict on billions of birds and mammals in our meat factories annually. The more people continue to eat meat, the more the practice will be considered …show more content…
While considering the ethical aspects of eating meat, I personally find myself imagining the human as part of a natural circle of life where animals kill and eat each other to survive. Genuine disgust at the cruelty has been evident in the response of donations to animal welfare groups. So it's not to say that farm animals get no sympathy in the United States, but only that Americans somehow don't recognize that cruelty is the norm, not the exception, and is incorporated into the very idea of factory farms; what makes meat cheap is the assembly line processing. Treating animals humanely begins with natural diets, open spaces for living, eliminating the use of hormones that manipulate body weight and mutilations, together with more in depth training for caretakers and inspectors, maybe surveillance cameras, and professionals who enforce laws and prosecute violators, and so on all of which would make meat more expensive. Nothing strikes me as more absurd than calling oneself an animal lover while consuming industrialized meat, though people will surely continue to lie to themselves and even offer various excuses to defend their habit. The modern animal rights movement has definitely impacted a range of concerns such as reducing the use of animals for furs and cosmetics testing, and

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    All beings are aware of animal slaughter for food purposes. One may either look away with guilt and still consume meat knowing in fact the process within animal slaughter, or on the crontary, not consume meat at all. Michael Pollan makes several points throughout his journal from “ The New York Times Magazine”, in which he advocates the idea of equality, factory farming, and humane farming. Within his several points, he arrives to a conclusion in which he proclaims that animals’ rights may still be honored during the preparation of the slaughtering of an animal.…

    • 1162 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the assertion of the author of “Eating animals”. While some people believes that the world is full of many other problems and this issue is not significant enough to be the first on the “Main problems of the mankind” Agenda, I believe the thinking of adopting (even partly) the not consuming factory farmed meat lifestyle is…

    • 298 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Another way to achieve more humane farming methods is through public policy. Evelyn Puhler's article, "Meat and Morality: Alternatives to Factory Farming," published in the Journal of Environmental Ethics, offers several ethical and moral alternatives to mass scale meat production and consumption, including vegetarianism and in-vitro meat production (?!), but the part of her article that relates to my exploration of sustainable and humane alternatives for meat production centers on government regulation. The European Union is more progressive than the U.S. on regulating humane farm practices; however, many U.S. states have taken steps to discontinue some of the most egregious practices, such as gestation crates, veal crates, and battery cages (Puhler 462). While the author examines whether any farming of animals for food can be considered moral or ethical, I don't believe we will become a nation of vegetarians any time soon, so the notion of regulating "humane" treatment of farm animals seems a real possibility. Another related…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article, “Is there a moral case for meat?”, Nathanael Johnson splits his essay into two parts. In the first part of the article, Johnson tries to find a logical counter…

    • 1085 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Pollan's Argument

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Here, I present an argument for the conclusion that it is morally permissible to eat humanely farmed meat.…

    • 1248 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If their lives have less value than that of humans, and their deaths would benefit humans, then killing and eating them is justified.1 The joy humans feel when eating meat outweighs the negatives of extinguishing of animal life, whether humane or not. My view on this issue closely aligns with those of Alastair Norcross, the author of “Puppies, Pigs and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases.” Eating meat that is the result of factory farming is morally wrong, and a moral person shouldn’t be taking pleasure from the products of torture.3 Almost no one can feign ignorance of the issues; videos of abuses have surfaced online, or been broadcasted through documentaries and by PETA, so anyone with access to social media or the Internet is aware that these methods of slaughter are not ethical. In the United States, the overabundance of food options and grocery stores indicates that we no longer need to hunt and gather to survive. Meat has become a luxury item since the vitamins and proteins it may provide us with can be gleaned from other sources. Frey cites animals as having lesser value because of their lack of agency, however, the mere fact that animals cannot be moral agents does not exclude them from being moral patients. Humans need to exercise their agency, be morally responsible and give animals consideration because of their status as moral patients and their ability to suffer.3 This…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    "A study funded by the American Farm Bureau Federation found that 95 percent of Americans believe farm animals should be well cared for" (Balk N.p.). In a society where the majority believes in the well treatment of animals, it is not surprising that most are unaware of the unethical practices in factory farms. If the population knew the circumstances placed on the animals such as chaining, crating, burning, dragging and more, all while still alive, there is no doubt that more people would protest and stop eating meat. "You 've got heat stress, rapid growth stress, ammonia stress due to poor air circulation, broken bones from rough handling," says Temple Grandin, an expert in low-stress animal handling facilities and professor of animal science at Colorado State University (Kimble-Evans N.p.). There is no ethical justification of these…

    • 1735 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is not what people say that defines them, rather it is what people do. Proclaimed sayings and words can only do so much to show a point of view. Ultimately, in society, the importance lies in how a person does something––not about the reasonings and the declarations. Inward principles do not impact other people nearly as much as outward practices. Hence, the importance of prioritizing the doing of one thing over the other. Currently, the treatment of animals by humans is unjust. As a species, starting long ago, humans have killed animals and have eaten their meat as a means of survival. In recent years, however, the desire for meat has come to the point where animals are being forcefully strangled to death and are being genetically manipulated to quickly grow and die. The people who have killed those animals may have had good intentions––to supply food to consumers––but the food was…

    • 1054 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jonathan Safran Foer talks about how his view about eating animals changed over time. One simple question took him to an enormous amount of research and the results shocked him. Throughout this essay I will be focusing on three main points that Foer talks thought the book for example, the changes that he did in his life, and how it all begin as well as some of his discoveries in his research. During his childhood, he did not question the food that his family served him, but as he got older he started wondering how did meat end up on his table, and how it was processed. As he learns more about where meat comes from, Foer started backing away from any food that contain meat.…

    • 1091 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage. Animal liberation is seen as the next logical step in our society but, we are far from it actually happening. The truth is we do not see anything of what is actually happening to the animals on large corporate farms and factories. This is something done on purpose to…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eating animals has been a regular meal for humans for many centuries, but it has also been opposed by veganists for many years. Although consuming animals has been opposed by vegan aficionados, it has also been a source of controversy because of how factory farming produces the meat we eat in our daily meals. In the book “Eating Animals” we get the sense that the author will be arguing and encouraging veganism, but instead he argues about how the meat we consume is produced. The author Jonathan Safran Foer’s main claim in the book is about boycotting animal factory farming and encouraging traditional husbandry because factory farm animals are stuffed with antibiotics, mutilated, tightly confined, and deprived of stimulation. While traditional…

    • 1283 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the major theories in philosophy is utilitarianism, which strives for producing the most amount of happiness. The utilitarian approach is based on the simple doctrine that if an action is ethical and it brings happiness to an individual or a group of people without causing pain, then it is acceptable. One of the main emphasis of utilitarianism is animal rights. It primarily focuses on the treatment of animals and how they should be treated more humanely. The paper will discuss utilitarian’s beliefs and whether they require people to stop eating animals and experimenting on them.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Animals are not ours to eat. Animals are not ours to wear. Animals are not ours to experiment on. Animals are not ours to use for entertainment. Animals are not ours to abuse in any way.” (Evans 21). A great defense for animal rights is philosophy, philosophical discussions use ideas and theories about questions morality. In this case philosophy is animal rights’ best supporter. The touchy subject that is animal rights can be difficult to conclude and apply to real-life situations, but philosophy is important because it explains people 's motivations and why people feel the way they do about an issue like animal cruelty and meat consumption. Philosophical arguments are typically used to either justify certain actions directed to animals today.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many people concern on what is right and wrong for animal treatment. These arguments are a major issue because many different views and beliefs of people reflect on them. Manly fighting and understanding who has the right over animals is the major concept. Since animals can not speak and choose for their own actions, many people believe that a truthful owner should have the say on what is right for their animal through their beliefs. No matter what regulations are set both sides of the argument will never be satisfied on how humans treat animals. Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Welfare Essay

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In the world today, people cannot do without animals because they have become an essential part of human existence to both vegetarians and meat eaters. Some animals serve as pet, and some serve as food, and others are used for sports and laboratory experiments. Although some animal activist advocates for animal rights, there are limits to that right because animals cannot be equal with human. They don’t have the intellectual ability that humans have to take responsibilities and control what happens around them. These animals are important…

    • 818 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays