Rhetorical Analysis Of The Pleasures Of Eating By Wendell Berry

Improved Essays
In 1990, author Wendell Berry released an essay titled “The Pleasures of Eating”. The essay focused on the responsibilities of eating, which includes self-awareness regarding what one’s consuming. Berry discusses how to eat responsibly throughout his piece, often citing the hidden dangers of the food industry, which includes the unjustifiable treatment of animals. Berry uses the rhetorical appeals in relation to these matters which allows him to connect and convey his message more strongly toward Americans, especially those living more rural lifestyles.
Berry begins his essay by giving a solution for how city people can bring new life to American farming and rural life. Berry’s solution is simply to “eat responsibly” (1). He elaborates on
…show more content…
Berry appeals to ethos by establishing his credibility in the beginning of the essay. Berry states that after most of his lectures that revolve around the decline of rural life and farming in America, he is often questioned by people regarding what city people can do to help (1). Through revealing that he does lectures often regarding American farming and rural life, Berry is able to establish that he is knowledgeable on the topic and most likely has past experience with the lifestyle. Due to this knowledge and possible prior experience, his audience is much more likely to believe what he’s saying. Berry lists seven suggestions revolving around how to eat more responsibly in his essay. Among these suggestions include participating in food production to whatever extent you can, preparing your own food, learning the origins of your food, dealing directly with a local farmer or gardener, learning as much as one can about the economy, learning what is involved in the best farming and learning about the life histories of the food species by direct observation (4-5). Berry’s audience may have a hard time conforming to these suggestions, especially if they do not believe he follows them himself. To address this possible audience concern, Berry attempts to persuade his audience by establishing credibility. Berry …show more content…
Logos is important since it appeals to the audience’s intellect. Facts and evidence are both presented in order to create an overall strong argument. Berry provides facts frequently throughout his essay such as in the quote stated in the prior paragraph when he discusses consumers’ knowledge regarding the lives of the animals responsible for the meat they are eating. Berry states that it would not do any good for a consumer to know that the steer one’s hamburger came from spent its life standing in its own excrement or that the calf that yielded the veal cutlet one’s eating spent its life in a box (3). Although not every animal is treated in unfavorable conditions, it is common knowledge that the majority of animals aren’t treated pristinely before being killed for their meat. Many of these animals being held in captivity are overly dependent on antibiotics and other drugs which is not an ideal situation (Berry 3). Crops are also dependent on toxic chemicals such as pesticide which many consumers may not be aware of. Berry states the fact that food companies have and are attempting to keep consumers from discovering too much about the issues of the quality and health of their food (3). The only true way to better the treatment of animals to be killed for meat and prevent the spraying of toxic chemicals onto crops is for the public to develop an awareness of what is truly happening in the food

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The meat industry is able to provide cheap and affordable meat to the consumers, that are unaware of the animal cruelty and environmental impact of the meat being purchased. Animals of the factory farms are by far the most disadvantaged. The animals of the factory farms are often treated harshly and have their bodies mutilated to prevent the animals from harming other animals, or to create room to fit the animal in their designated cage. In addition to the animals, the surrounding environment and people are also…

    • 2094 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The book “Harvest for Hope”, written by Jane Goodall, outlines and inspires the audience to eat mindfully and healthily. The author explains how a great portion of our nutrient intake is unknowingly mixed with toxins, and made in miserable conditions. Dr. Goodall explains this successfully by analyzing the typical practices of industrial agriculture, which then leads her on to examine the repercussions of these techniques, pressing the point that we are fatally detached from nature and it’s ethics. This novel informs the public not only how to leave a small environmental footprint, but also how one can do so positively. Jane Goodall associates many of humanity’s problems to the way the nutrition is composed.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Encumbered by highly advanced agricultural inventions, the American diet has evolved into a dilemma producing detrimental health affects for our nation. While a plethora of food choices, from chicken nuggets to Twinkies, may appear to be a dietary utopia; the technological advancements in the food industry have produced food-like products rather than authentic food. This nation-wide eating disorder has kept Americans in a cyclical process of attempting to achieve a thin figure while still gaining pounds. Through the course of his book, The Omnivore’s Dilemma, Michael Pollan investigates four meals: a meal from McDonalds eaten in the car, an organic based meal from Whole Foods, a meal from an organic, sustainable farm, and lastly, a meal that Pollan hunted and gathered himself.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Furthermore, Berry suggests that even though we are not knowledgeable of how our food is produced, we have the ability to change our pleasure through free-will with exceptions to economic conditions. Berry puts forth several alternatives to change our lifestyle such as growing our own food, buying locally, and knowing how and where food is produced. As a result, Berry establishes an optimistic tone of the decisions we make on a daily basis, in order for the everyday individual to rethink about how they can change the way they eat for better health reasons and and overall experience. With this , “Goal Replace Risk Assessment With Alternative Assessment” delivers a stronger message to the reader about how change can be possible due to addressing conflicts we as a society can approach and value, its use of pathos, and the importance of life and…

    • 1605 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While there are room for improvements in her writing, Spriggs authoritative tone, logical rebuttals, and appropriately addressed counter arguments prove to make her essay an effective piece for persuading those who may have not followed her same belief system. Furthermore, with the organization of her writing, it's easy for readers to follow her argument from beginning to end, summarizing information and discovering a clear point as to what she wants her audience to think and do. Although some people may still have doubts on the benefits of buying local after reading Spriggs essay, the current push in America towards a greener, more sustainable way of living will eventually prevail. Consequently, this will cause the current way of large-scale monoculture farming to fall out of favor to the healthier, more sustainable way of local…

    • 888 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Wendell Berry, in an article from What are People For? Essays (June 29, 2009) entitled “The Purpose of Eating” proposes that to appreciate eating, we must be responsible, know about the food we eat, and be part of the agricultural process. Berry explains that eaters have become passive consumers and proposes that they should participate in food production and research about the food that they eat so they can really enjoy eating. He hopes to persuade people to reclaim the responsibility for their eating choices in order to fully enjoy the pleasures of eating that does not rely on ignorance. Berry shares his own stories, preferences, and tips to consumers that he wants to start eating responsibly as if they were friends who he was trying…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    My response to Michael Pollan’s “Escape from the Western Diet” In Michael Pollan’s argument “Escape from the Western Diet” he claims that the western diet is the cause of western diseases. Pollan also thinks that the food industry and health care industry are working together. This can be concluded by the evidence provided and personal experience. Pollan provided great evidence that can be seen but hasn’t been noticed because it is something that may seem normal now.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Defense Of Food Summary

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In Defense of Food is a look into a society harboring an unhealthy obsession with healthy eating. Michael Pollan is an author, journalist, and professor of journalism at the University of California. He has written four New York Times bestsellers, and has had articles published in The New York Times Magazine, Harper’s Magazine, and National Geographic. In Defense of Food is one of multiple books he has written focusing on diet, and his aim is to help readers “reclaim their health and happiness as eaters,” by defending food and the eating thereof. He starts this book off with the simple mantra: Eat food.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Payton White Professor Hunsaker 3 September 2016 Articles 26 & 27 After analyzing article 26, “Puppies, Pigs, and People: Eating Meat and Marginal Cases” by Alastair Norcross, a couple things become apparent. Such as (only use “such as” if you are continuing the sentence, but not to start a new sentence.) our author opening up his piece with a fictional scenario that seems a tad bit crazy, but serves as a very serious philosophical point. According to our ( it would be best to just say, “the” author instead of “our” author.) author, Norcross sees meat-eaters-at least those who know of the treatment of factory-farmed animals-are completely at fault for the consumption of meat.…

    • 1262 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Michael Pollan’s “An Animal’s Place” Pollan provides an argument on whether or not Americans should consume animals, and specifically, if the fashion in which animals are farmed and slaughtered respects their capacity to suffer. Pollan illustrates his personal dilemma particularly when he ironically points his debate on whether or not to eat meat began while he was dining at a steakhouse. To develop his argument, Pollan initially exclusively uses the citation of animal rights activists, but then gradually cites experts that support his conclusion that Americans eat animals as long as the principle behind it is correct, and animals are treated with respect. He asserts to accomplish respecting animals that Americans need to regain their contact…

    • 1386 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal cruelty has always been a challenge that gets overlooked by society in the food market. Many people do not take into consideration the life of the cow, chicken, or pig, and lots of other animals, while enjoying their juicy hamburger, chicken leg, and bacon. “An Animal’s Place” by Michael Pollan argues about animal liberation while using support from Peter Singer’s “Animal Liberation” book. Peter Singer is pro animal rights and has converted lots and outs of people over to vegetarianism, while Michael Pollan loves steak and seeks to see if Singer could convert him as well. Our world changes consistently with the trends of our society, from the civil rights movements of blacks and women, to the legalization of gay marriage.…

    • 1046 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I want to present two people, Henry David Thoreau and a vegan. Thoreau was an American Romantic who decided to go to the woods to live off the land, so he spent a year at Walden Pond hoeing beans and watching the water to show that anyone can sustain themselves on a small budget and nature while a vegan abstains from consuming any animal products. What do they have in common? Stereotypically, vegans are outspoken and obnoxious, and for some, Thoreau is annoying and irrelevant. Yet they share a common interest: the environment.…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his article, Berry (321) began with a discussion on the idea that eating is an agricultural act, ending the…

    • 850 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Changing human diet can be a controversial topic and to change this omnivore’s mind one needs to present facts as cold as a fresh cut of meat. Marjorie Lee Garretson’s “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is an essay that tries to persuade the reader to a vegan lifestyle under the guise of vegetarianism using few cited sources and trying to make the reader feel bad about the way they currently eat. “More Pros Than Cons in a Meat-Free Life” is a college level essay written by Marjorie Lee Garretson about the potential positives to vegetarian lifestyle. The essay first focuses on the health benefits of switching to vegetarianism which is done in three sentences claiming decreased cancer rates and longer life expectancy without any…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Ethical Argument In Animal Welfare

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited

    Many show that a major issue in animal welfare should be solved by vegetarianism and not torture animals to get their meat. As Freeman argues, “animals used for food in the United States are commonly treated like unfeeling tools of production, rather than living, feeling animals,” (Freeman 170). Many feel the need to reduce meat because of animal cruelty, and not because of the welfare of the…

    • 1672 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 10 Works Cited
    Great Essays

Related Topics