• Home Page
  • Summary Of Mccloskey's On Being An Atheist

Summary Of Mccloskey's On Being An Atheist

Superior Essays
Show More
In his work, On Being an Atheist, McCloskey attempted to show that atheism to hold more sense and facts compared to Christian beliefs. The large part of his work focused on arguing against the three major proofs that exist among most individuals in the universe today. Through his argument against theistic proofs that include cosmological argument, the argument from design and the teleological argument, McCloskey stated that it is irrational for any human being to live by faith. He goes on to deduce that the three agreements cannot prove or cannot be the basis to show that God exists. Proof helps in establishing a fact or the truth of a statement but according to McCloskey there is no proof that God exists, and thus, it should not play a vital …show more content…
According to McCloskey, this argument widely focuses on describing and justifying the universe as is known by all individuals today. According to the argument regarding the presence of God, there must exist a creator be it a being or a thing that made the world as we know it today. However, according to McCloskey there, the mere presence of the universe and everything in it is not reason enough to affirm that God exists. Despite the existence of a positive and strong correlation between the things that will come to be extant, things that live and exist and things that used to be extant, McCloskey does not believe that that something else like power, being or force plays any important part in their existence. On the contrary, Evans and Manis’ discussion, there are necessary beings and contingent beings that are responsible for setting forth in motion the ring of causality. Thus, the necessary beings must exist for the contingent beings to exist. As a result, God must exist for the world to exist concluding that he is the creator and the all-powerful, all-perfect and uncaused …show more content…
Although McCloskey does not define what is evil, he gives all kind of notion to explain what is evil. The theist explanation dies not prove why there is evil in the universe but rather offer possible justifications to account for all evil in the creation. From the arguments, it is easy to point out that the arguments they admit the presence of perfect God, but they cannot negate the possibility of all-perfect God allowing evil into the universe. The presences of evil help to magnify the good as well provide set standards to measure good. Thus, the presence of evil in the universe is the free will of human being.
The argument of free will gives a justification as to why there is so much evil in the world today. Considering that God gave humanity the right to choose the right and wrong, all the evil can be attributed to this freedom. If free will were not true, the laws, rewards, and punishments would eventually lose their purpose and meaning. Right and wrong create the necessity for an individual to understand the difference between them. Without the free will, people with good intentions would not have the freedom to choose what is best for them. Free will gives human being ultimate glory of making life

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    John L. Mackie's Argument Against The Problem Of Evil
    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages

    John L. Mackie's Argument Against The Problem Of Evil

    An Australian philosopher named John L. Mackie is widely known for his argument against the problem of evil. Mackie’s argument was very similar to the problem of evil. The problem of evil in summary states that a God cannot exist with the existence of evil, but Mackie’s argument was not that God did not exist entirely, but rather that God did not exist as an all-powerful or perfect God. He argued that having an all knowing God, and the present existence of evil were both logically inconsistent. Mackie thought that if you could say one of those statements was false, then you could still believe in God’s existence. He thought that not a lot of people would be willing to compromise and accept one of those beliefs however, because if someone did they would be left with the conclusion that their high and all mighty God was in fact un-worthy of worshipping. After Mackie comes up with his own take on the problem of evil, he agrees with a lot of the points the problem of evil considers, and comes to the conclusion that the problem of evil is both inconsistent and illogical.…

    • 1018 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    McCloskey makes the following statement challenging this argument, “The mere existence of the world constitutes no reason for believing in such a being.” (2) There is definitely a reason for our universe and why it is the way it is. Evans and Manis make a valid point when they say that there appears to be no natural reason why our universe exists versus nothing existing. Many of the items in our universe are contingent meaning that they exist but they do not necessarily have to exist. When this is taken into consideration then it leads one to wonder what purpose those items have for existing at all. “Contingent beings require a necessary being as their ultimate cause.” (3) There are several objections to this theory. The first argument is the atheistic claim that the universe has always existed. This objection can only go against the temporal forms of the argument though. The non-temporal form of the cosmological argument does not deal with the concept of time, and is able to stand up to this objection. The second argument is that if everything in the universe needs a cause, then so must God. Manis and Evans make the observation that God is not a contingent being so it is unnecessary to provide an explanation of his beginnings. They point out that God would not be God if we humans were able to trace His origins. Through this reasoning we can believe that God is the…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Peter Van Inwagen The Argument From Evil Analysis
    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Peter Van Inwagen The Argument From Evil Analysis

    The essay regarding evil and its relation to free will entitled “The Argument from Evil” by Peter Van Inwagen proposes many questions and contradictions. All of which relate back to one principle idea—the problem of evil and how to solve it. At the end of his compilation of ideas, propositions and examples, Van Inwagen poses a slew of questions for his readers to ponder and attempt to answer.…

    • 1858 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Analysis
    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Mccloskey On Being An Atheist Analysis

    discussed what exactly is evil. He defined good and evil although he shared how to define…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Freewill Argument
    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Freewill Argument

    As I will be using it, freewill is an individual’s ability to make choices. Yet, to say that our choices are not guided, I argue is incorrect. For instance, I believe that one’s natural instinct to remove his hand from a hot surface can be seen as a guide to good behavior. Basically, the impulse to get away from the surface is says that “putting your hand near fiery hot objects is dangerous” and that “it’s probably safer to keep away”. Of course for freewill to still exist, that suggestion must be taken in many way, which indeed it is. Most people will oblige the suggestion by keep hot surfaces at a distance. At the same time, some will ignore it briefly to play with matched and, to the extreme, others will straight up go against it by burning themselves. In all facets of life, there are varying degrees of freedom from the guides put in place. The ability to divert from these guides constitutes freewill. The guides themselves represent in my opinion an outline of good behavior impressment upon the world by an omnibenevolent God. That God wants the greatest good. However, to limit the degrees of freedom from which people can diverge is to limit freewill and to ultimately limit the quality of the resulting good, which I will dive into more in just a bit. The main point here is that people can choose otherwise and, thus they can choice to be evil, resulting in a world were evil…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    An Analysis Of Why I Am Not A Christian, Mere Christianity
    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An Analysis Of Why I Am Not A Christian, Mere Christianity

    What makes the good pure and evil bad? You are just about to find that out. We shall find the basis supporting this argument on the researches of three scholars who conducted an in-depth analysis on the subject. Each of these authors has their different contributions which must be not be ignored, to understand the existence of man in the universe, and things that control him. We shall look at the works of three researchers, who are Bertrand Russell, in his contributions on why I am Not a Christian, Mere Christianity by C.S Lewis, and finally, The Age of A reason.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis
    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccloskey Argument Analysis

    McCloskey tempts the theists to look for answers and reasoning in a different way with his statement. In response, Evan and Manis say that the thrust of the non-temporal argument is that present existence of contingent objects requires that there be a necessary being” (Evans & Manis, 2009). As mentioned McCloskey claims that everything requires a cause for its existence; therefore God requires a cause for his existence. Evans and Manis discuss it this way, the argument assumes that all contingent beings require a cause for their existence; however, God is not a contingent being; only a self-existent or necessary being can qualify for the title of “God.” (Evans & Manis, 2009). Therefore, something distinct from the universe, some unconditional agent would be necessary to have created the universe.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence
    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Cosmological Argument Of Existence

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world. Since humans don’t have an explanation for their own existence in the universe, they automatically assume their must be a Creator of all things. This raises the ultimate question of why does anything on earth and earth itself exists. Although the Cosmological Argument opens up the though process to the idea of there being a creator of all things, I agree…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccaloakey And Cosmological Proof Analysis
    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Mccaloakey And Cosmological Proof Analysis

    So positive that he confidently states: “No being who was perfect could have created a world in which there was avoidable suffering or in which his creatures would (and in fact could have been created so as not to) engage in morally evil acts, acts which very often result in injury to innocent persons.” After reading this I feel as if McCloskey is blaming the evil doing on God. We in fact know that no man is able to answer the question of why men innocent people. We however can entail that men make their own decisions. It is the ones that believe in God that repent on his mistake made, while being in an evil mind set. I can argue and say that there was an evil spirit, one not of God, that caused the evil…

    • 1532 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Mccloskey Argumentative Analysis

    In the mid-20th century, a renowned philosopher H.J. McCloskey wrote an attention-grabbing article called “On being and Atheist”. In McCloskey article, he argues on how the existences of God fails to be proven or sustained. The author argues that there is insufficient arguments to prove a theist belief while accrediting an atheistic point of view. The following essay is a response to McCloskey article from a different angle.…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Craig Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay
    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Craig Kalam Cosmological Argument Essay

    Craig Kalam’s Cosmological argument argues in favor of the existence of God. The premises for the argument are as follows,…

    • 481 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil
    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Richard Swinburne's Theodicy: The Logical And Evidential Problem Of Evil

    Swinburne offers a free will theodicy. Before explaining his theodicy it is important to note the two types of evil. Natural evil, which is caused by disease, unforeseeable accidents, and natural disasters. Then there is moral evil, caused by humans intentionally doing actions they should not be, or evil caused out of negligence. God offers free will, humans have the power of make significant choices between good and evil. Free will needs to be there in order for deeper goods to come from it. There needs to be a choice of good and evil so evil is not necessary. As for natural evil possibilities, the evil would be consistent with God. The natural possibilities of evil are explained through three premises. If God is omnibenevolent, then He seeks to give us the deepest of goods, if God seeks to give us the deepest of goods, He will give us free and responsible choice, if God gives us that choice, then there exists the natural possibility of evil. This comes to the conclusion that if God is omnibenevolent then the natural possibility of evil…

    • 1073 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Atheist-Theist Argument
    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Atheist-Theist Argument

    The atheist-theist argument has been an age-long debate. Though it is debated, it does not mean that it is, by any means, a matter of a guess. A theist can have full confidence that God is real, as well as reasonable evidence to reach that conclusion in lieu of the many atheist arguments. In Have Atheists Proved There Is No God by Thomas B. Warren, the reader is introduced to an atheist argument that has been widely used for numerous years and it’s logical implications. In addition to the impressive atheist argument of evil, the author makes his case for theism and why the idea of God is not illogical because of the great amounts of evil in the world. This is done by means of strict logical fashion, which is the use of propositions that come to a conclusion that must be logically sound.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis Of A Simpler Free Will Defense
    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Analysis Of A Simpler Free Will Defense

    The problem of evil has been a consistent argument coming from both theists and atheists for ages. In this paper the argument will be examined from both sides, the article A Simpler Free Will Defense” will be summarized, and I will analyze the article and additionally explain why my side of the argument is correct. The question that stands is “if there is a God how does he let evil occur?” Is it that this God cannot prevent the evil, which goes against the typical theist view that God is omnipotent, or will he not prevent evil, which goes against the concept of an omnibenevolent God. In an excerpt from The Philosophers Way John Hick talks about how evil can be allowed while still having an omnipotent, omnibenevolent, and omnipresent God he…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis
    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Evil And Omnipotence Analysis

    For the definition of free will to reign true, human beings must make actions at their own discretion even if it is the wrong choice, which I have previously mentioned is an arbitrary measure. Once humans are created to always choose the good thing, the element of freedom is…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings