Reasons For The Presence Of God

Improved Essays
The standard definition given to God is a being that is supreme, omniscient and omnibenevolent. To give understanding on whether a being of this nature exists or does not exist requires investigation of what reasons or proof is there for tolerating the presence of God as genuine or false and whether the conditions expressed are conceivable. When regular contentions for the presence of God are assessed, the point will be to demonstrate the presence of God is unprovable and that it is sensible to presume that God does not exist.

Firstly, a typical endeavor to demonstrate God 's presence is the contention of clever outline. In this contention, the case is that the universe is systematic and organized in its appearance looking like a machine-like
…show more content…
In nature we see that each occasion has a cause; consequently, there more likely than not been an underlying cause to get the universe to unfurl as so. The underlying cause is God. This contention does not include any decisiveness, yet rather just pushes the inquiry further for one could request that what created God exist? A run of the mill answer to this is God does not have any significant bearing to the circumstances and end results law expressed and exists in light of the fact that. It appears to be difficult to contend this however one could without much of a stretch envision that some matter just exists as well; and that it doesn 't make a difference to the circumstances and end results administer yet exists in light of the fact that. There is no motivation to infer that God is the main thing conceivable of this exclusion making the contention miss the mark at demonstrating God 's presence. Perhaps some exceptionally straightforward piece or bits of matter just existed bringing about the chain of occasions prompting the entire universe being made. On the off chance that God can have no cause, than it 's pretty much as legitimate a suspicion to think different things could have no cause …show more content…
The issue emerges when considering God 's omnibenevolence and the presence of insidiousness on the planet. In principle, since God is the maker of everything and is additionally all knowing and all effective, he needs to know the idea of insidiousness and let it emerge on the planet. Tailing, it is a disagreement to say that God is maximally great, since he would not let enduring and wrong doings on the planet. Under this meaning of God, underhandedness ought not exist. A counter to this announcement is God gave people the decision to act uninhibitedly. In this way, the issue of insidiousness was produced by the nature of flexibility of decision that god connected to people. In any case, this comment would undermine God 's omniscient quality since all-knowing ought to incorporate knowing the future, or this would turn into a point of confinement to it. Thusly, by knowing the future disasters that giving human 's through and through freedom would bring about would even now miss the mark concerning being maximally great. Along these lines, a God that is omnibenevolent, supreme, and omniscient can 't coherently

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Aquinas argued this, though. He claimed that if we did lack true freedom then God would be an unjust god and we would pretty much be punished for doing wrong when we had no control of us doing anything at all. One way that Aquinas tried to argue this point was to say that God was “timeless” (Renick, pg.43). Aquinas claims that God is beyond time. He sees the past, the present and the future all at once while we humans, are within time.…

    • 1634 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Other than the clear statement that God was the initial cause for all things that exist, it appears God is exempt from causation. Non-theists suggest that if something clearly causes itself to exist, therefore nothing exists before it exists at all. Logically, the idea seems impossible. While arguments posed criticize the cosmological argument and its flaws, it does not prove it to be false. However, while taking into account the lack of present evidence, the argument for God’s existence based on his apparent creation of the universe is lacking with insufficient credibility to go behind it.…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under that definition, he concludes that God’s existence is either necessary or impossible. It is not impossible for God to exist so it must be necessary that he exist; therefore, he exists. Malcolm comes to the conclusion that God’s existence is necessary impossible using two scenarios. In scenario one God’s existence is possible but he failed to exist. For God to have failed to exist something had the power to prevent his existence, but God by definition is all powerful.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes Existence Of God

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Cottingham, in his book Descartes, affirms that "The problem is given special piquancy by Descartes ' own statement (...) that 'the certainty and truth of all knowledge depends on my knowledge of the true God ' ". This suggests that the knowledge of God should be axiomatic - but it isn 't. Although all the knowledge depends on the knowledge of true God, Descartes ' does not have, at the starting point, any knowledge of God. He shouldn 't be able to give forth any certain and truthful judgment, yet he claims to do so. Apparently, Descartes employs 'clear and distinct ideas ' in demonstrating that God exists (when he perceives clearly and distinctly that 'existence ' is an essential attribute of God or when he puts forth the causal principle) and then justifies the truthfulness of the clear and distinct ideas by the existence of God.…

    • 1454 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This “grants the illusion of free will instead of free will itself, creating a dissonance between true free will and elements of determinism” (Perry 395). Libertarianism holds that determinism is false and actions that are explained by pre-determined forces do not exist. Open Theism, a component to the Libertarian rationalization of free will, asserts that God choses to be ignorant of the choices we make throughout our lives. The theory relies on the fact that God, being omnipotent, has knowledge of every outcome that has the potential to be a reality. However, doesn’t know the outcome that will become the reality.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For, true faith occurs when the belief in question is known to be false. But Kierkegaard’s God is neither imperfect nor perfect like that of Hume, or lawless like that of Dostoevsky. Rather he is simply vague—a concept to which we assign a name. Acknowledging this opacity allows Kierkegaard to almost, if not entirely ignore the matter of evil. Presumably, his conclusion may be that because God does not exist and all we have control over is whether or not we choose to believe, we need not justify the role of suffering since there is no protective force watching over…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Freewill Argument

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Both Mackie’s logical problem of evil and his further dismissal of the freewill hypothesis incorrectly focus on God in terms of his power, not of the knowledge that controls it. I will not make the same mistake. So, I will regard every exertion of power as an exertion of knowledge for God must have reasons behind exerting power. If there is no smart reason to exert power, as is the case for the freewill system, no exertion of power should be expected. God must first fulfill his omniscience.…

    • 2367 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Free Will Problem

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages

    the PKG god) and though using god seems like it would cancel out any question that free will does in fact exists, in actuality bringing god into it makes things more complicated. The concept of free choice and a god that is both all knowing and all good is paradoxical because if god is not ignorant of our choices and is aware of them before we even make them, then how are our decisions made freely? In addition, how is god all good? After all, a god that is all good would surely interfere if he knew that a choice made would cause suffering. To conclude, if one believes in the PKG one must also admit that the free will does not actually exist because that would mean that god is unaware of the choices one makes and therefore is not all-knowing or all good.…

    • 1005 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Descartes, things are sure paying little mind to sense experience and it appears to be rationally unthinkably to think about them as false. Given this, Descartes builds up his reasoning for the existence of God as an all-perfect being. He does this by starting with a thought that is viewed as sure and ascribing what makes us feel as though something is sure. For this situation he considers something sure as something so plainly and strikingly saw that it can't be untrue. Here he infers then that for something to be true, I simply need to have an unmistakable and distinctive thought of it and that alone is sufficient precursor for its truth-esteem.…

    • 851 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This assumption is very reasonable. If god is omnipotent, omniscient he must have control of everything in the universe and if he wanted to change something he could with no difficulty. He would not be going against human will by choosing not to let the sun blow up. Nevertheless here’s the first area where Hick’s solution beats Clarke’s story of injustice. John Hick’s essay says that in order to live out “soul-making” one must live in a world of laws of physics and science.…

    • 2670 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Great Essays