Cosmological Argument Essay

Improved Essays
The argument for the existence of God I find those most interesting is the Cosmological argument. The Cosmological argument starts with the idea that everything in nature has an explanatory or sensible sequence. For these sequences to exist and be so efficient it must be concluded that something must have caused them and put them into place, a thing that was not just another part of nature or sequence. To fully sum up and conclude this argument it must be put together that a powerful force or even “God like” being must have implemented nature and all of its many sequences. This out of all the arguments makes the most sense. In simpler terms the Cosmological argument states: God must exist because anything that exists with explanatory or purposeful …show more content…
Evil is not a problem unless it is directly related to the existence of God. The problem of evil is that if God exists he either allows evil to happen and is not the greatest most benevolent and righteous good, or he cannot stop it and is not all powerful. A direct response to the problem of evil is that God would not allow natural evil, such as hurricanes, or human evil, such as rape and torture. The idea of God is a being with ultimate power, ultimate good, and ultimate seer of the world. When we talked about the problem of evil in class, the indirect situation that stood out to me most was the one that was also in the book. The situation of the painful death of the young deer with no benefit to its demise seems to be a great indirect response to suffering in which a wholly good and omnipresent being could have stopped with no barriers. The situation was proved truly evil because nothing was gained from the death of the fawn, no other deer were around to learn a lesson about avoiding fires and aid evolution, this was just a case of pure suffering for absolutely no reason. God’s existence and the problem of evil constantly fight against each other. Basically, the problem of evil is that if evil exists then God cannot exist in the terms in which we believe God to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The two arguments that I think are the most compelling from this unit are the Ontological Argument, which is a priori argument, meaning before the experience. The other argument that is compelling is the Cosmological argument which is a posterior argument, or after the experience. The Ontological argument cam from Anselm and it states that “it is greater to exist in the mind and reality that just the mind, therefore God must exist” (McGowan). The Ontological argument isn’t about facts about the cosmos, but rather the concept of God. The Cosmological Argument states that “everything that is in motion is moved by something else, and infinite regress is impossible; there must have been a first mover; that first mover being God” (McGowan).…

    • 1204 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nathan Cha Professor Song Philosophical Perspectives 17 December 2015 The cosmological Argument In William Lane Craig’s, “The Kalam Cosmological Argument,” he argues that whatever begins to exists had a cause of its existence, and since the universe began to exist Craig claims that the universe had a cause for existing. Craig furthers his claim by stating that God is the cause for the universe existing. To object to this argument J.L. Mackie brings some questions to the table to unpack Craig’s claims.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These arguments do come together though to form a strong case for the theistic belief in God. Dr. Mark Foreman suggests using four elements when approaching these arguments. These elements are the best explanation approach, the cumulative approach, the aspect of defeasibility, and the minimalistic concept. The best explanation approach simply implies that God is the best explanation for certain aspects of the universe. This approach is actually used often throughout science to affirm things we cannot see or touch such as electrons and black holes.…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Teleological Argument for the Existence of God, also known as “Arguments from Design”, states that a designer must exist because the universe and living things exhibit marks of design in their order, consistency, unity, and pattern, and that designer is God. One of the analogies used for this argument is William Paley’s Watch Maker Argument. He gives the scenario: if you were to find a watch in an open field you would automatically assume that it was designed and did not just randomly form out of thin air. Based off this argument, if you agree that the universe and its inhabitants are designed in some way for a purpose, then there must be a designer responsible, which would be God. Believers in the Teleological Argument also argue that scientists and evolutionists are unable to explain how complex organisms such as the eye originated.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The cosmological argument takes the presence of the universe to involve the presence of a being that made it. It is an argument that begins from the presence of the universe, and from endeavors to demonstrate the presence of God. This argument draws on involvement from the material world. It is crucial to know that the most this contention can plan to demonstrate is that there exists a vital being who caused everything in the universe. Nagel’s summary of this argument is as follows:…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will explain and evaluate two popular arguments regarding the existence of God, A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God by Robin Collins and The Inductive Argument from Evil Against the Existence of God by William Rowe; then I will discuss how the conclusions are not compatible with one another due to the conflicting structure of the conclusions as well as how one cannot accept both conclusions without compromising one of the arguments. First I will explain the basis of Collins’ argument, which is one of the most frequently used arguments in favor of theism. In A Scientific Argument for the Existence of God, Collins centers around the observation of how finely tuned the physical constants of the universe are to the ability for any form of life to exist, if any of them were to change even the smallest bit then no life would possibly be able to develop not to…

    • 1636 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Teleological Argument The existence of God can be supported by the design argument or teleological arguments that conclude: since nature looks like it was designed, then nature was or has a designer which we call God. Not only is nature designed but things humans have created are designed also. In order to have something in existence, it must have a creator which must have designed that something. A number of arguments utilize design arguments in favor of the existence of God.…

    • 1740 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If the theist was to truly believe that God was not wholly good, then he is opening doors to a sadistic God. Also, the theist could reject that God is not omnipotent. But the problem still remains of the theist not truly accepting that God is not all-powerful, and he cannot eliminate evil. The theist’s adequate solutions are not enough to get out of the problem of evil because he cannot fully accept the rejection of one proposition. Therefore, it is assumed that if the theist when discussing the problem of evil rejects the proposition, the proposition is then assumed elsewhere in the…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The teleological argument is an argument attempting to prove God’s existence based on the evidence of design and order in the universe. It works based on the belief that there must have been an intelligent designer, and the only being powerful enough to have created the universe is God. The argument is a posteriori and inductive; it looks at our experience of the universe and draws inferences from it. As they are based on inferences, these conclusions are statements of probability rather than perfect proofs. Many philosophers have worked on the teleological argument – for example, Thomas Aquinas and William Paley.…

    • 1395 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first argument McCloskey objects is the Cosmological Argument. The Cosmological Argument is considered the argument of existence. McCloskey argues that the existence of the entire world does not make it a legit reason to believe in a higher being. He suggests the only reason people take this stance behind the Cosmological Argument is because they are reliant organisms within the world.…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The reason why we give this up is because getting rid of God being omnibenevolent would diminish the idea of him existing. Not only that, you can’t get rid of evil because evil actually…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sense brute being do not have a cause, they can’t exist through the principle of sufficient reason. The cosmological argument is defended through this…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Lucas Shaw Short paper #1 Philosophy, Topic #2 Cosmological argument for the existence of God. Cosmological argument: An argument (or set of arguments) that undertakes to “prove” that God exists on the basis of the idea that there must have been a first cause or an ultimate reason for the existence of the universe (Introducing Philosophy, pg 661). This is the definition of this argument according to this particular book.…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Before I explain that, I am going to tell you what is cosmological argument. The cosmological Argument (Greek "cosmos"= orderly whole): a posterior, deductive. "god" is the "first (uncaused) cause "of the cosmos. it is deductive, so it is a candidate for soundness. Then the cosmological argument is the argument that the existence of the world or universe is strong evidence for the existence of a God who created it.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Existence of God This argument about the existence of God, better known as the cosmological argument, begins with the late philosopher Aristotle. Similar to a modern day natural scientist, he believed that we could ascertain more about the world and the very fundamental nature of things within our world just by observing and recording. In many ways Aristotle resemble a modern day artist, a person who goes through life experiencing and watching all different types of energy that’s around, visually records this information and help others by spreading this knowledge to the mass. Aristotle too, would look and study the world and its patterns that were around him in order to gain insight into his world.…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays