Social control models assume that people’s motivation to offend is restrained by their relations to society, conceived of as social bonds (Hirschi, 1969). Existing research provides strong empirical evidence that the family often serves as a “buffering agent” for a newly released prisoner (Irwin 1970).Family ties represent a source of social control in that they connect reentering offenders to the conventional social order and in doing so thwart their impulses to recidivate (Laub& Sampson, 2003). In the words of Glaser (1964, p. 335), these ties are “insulation from the criminal influences” that reentering offenders encounter in free society. For instance, family ties structure offenders’ daily routines, placing restrictions on where they go to socialize, with whom they associate, and the types of behaviors they engage in while socializing (e.g. heavy drinking, partying in bars and clubs, and drug use) (Warr,
Social control models assume that people’s motivation to offend is restrained by their relations to society, conceived of as social bonds (Hirschi, 1969). Existing research provides strong empirical evidence that the family often serves as a “buffering agent” for a newly released prisoner (Irwin 1970).Family ties represent a source of social control in that they connect reentering offenders to the conventional social order and in doing so thwart their impulses to recidivate (Laub& Sampson, 2003). In the words of Glaser (1964, p. 335), these ties are “insulation from the criminal influences” that reentering offenders encounter in free society. For instance, family ties structure offenders’ daily routines, placing restrictions on where they go to socialize, with whom they associate, and the types of behaviors they engage in while socializing (e.g. heavy drinking, partying in bars and clubs, and drug use) (Warr,