Social Reintegration In Federal Prisons

Improved Essays
Social reintegration is nearly non-existent with the current prison-based system for drug abusers. Incarceration has little effect on drug users, and recidivism is highly likely due to social isolation. The problems existing pre-incarceration, which led to the drug abuse, exist even after release. Such problems include difficulties with housing, employment, and social activity. These issues mainly exist in impoverished communities and are exacerbated by the current prison system. Nearly half of all inmates in federal prisons are drug offenders 50 percent of whom are non-violent first-time offenders. With recidivism rates, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, at 76 percent for drug offenders, it is clear that the current system is

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Nixon Drug Cartels Essay

    • 1373 Words
    • 5 Pages

    As we stated before about five percent of the World population and 25 percent of world prisoners are citizens of the U.S. Only one quarter of the U.S. population are African American and Hispanics. Anybody would think that our justice system would serve right, but in reality it does not. Although white people are five times more likely to use drugs, an estimate of 58 percent of all prisoners are African American and Hispanic and African Americans face jail time at nearly six times the rate of whites. In fact Hispanics are almost four times as likely to go to prison at some point, but less likely than African Americans are sent to prison for drug offenses at ten times the rate as whites. Research shows that African Americans represent 12 percent of the total population of drug users, but 38 percent of those arrested for drug offenses, and 59 percent of those in state prison for a drug offense.…

    • 1373 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Drug Court Model

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This paper written by Amanda B. Cissner and Michael Rempel, discusses what the drug courts are, a brief explanation when and how the drug courts got started, how do they work, and what do they do for the people who are given the treatment for their dug usage problems. In this review paper I’m going to explain what those points are and what do they mean to me in my own words. Drug courts was introduced in 1989 in Miami, it launched dramatic shift in how the court system responds to the criminal behavior of drug addicted defendants, by combining treatment with close supervision, the drug court model offered new alternative to the unproductive and costly cycle of addiction crime, and incarceration. In other ways it seems like they’re going to…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug offenders accounted for 76% of inmates who were rearrested” (NIJ: recidivism,…

    • 662 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Case Study: Drug Courts

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The evidence is clear that drug courts can increase an offender’s contact to treatment. Numerous drug court evaluation have found, on average, more than half of offenders participating in the program completed at least one year; most of which continue on to graduate from it. This compare favorably to community based drug treatment programs in which, on average, more than three quarters of attendees drop out within the first year.…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the last few decades, the U.S. population of incarcerated citizens exploded from around 300,000 to more than 2 million, with drug convictions accounting for a majority of the increase. The War on Drugs functions more realistically as…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Research Paper

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The first drug court was established in Miami-Dade, Florida in 1989 (National Association of Drug Professionals). Drug courts were established because of the “revolving door of drug use” and increasing recidivism rates. Drug courts have the ability to change a person’s life for the better by teaching them how to beat their addictions while providing the proper treatments for each offender. As a result, of the ongoing development of drug courts, it is unfair to expect the system to be indefectible. Drug court programs usually take between six months to a year to be completed.…

    • 1737 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Drug Courts Recidivism

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to the implications of Reagan's War on Drugs laws, drug courts have demonstrated and proven to reduce recidivism for offenders who abuse substances. To deter overcrowding in the prisons, Researcher Messer has found that drug courts can be instrumental in deterring offenders from reoffending. It is surprising that “85% of offenders incarcerated require substance abuse treatment” (Messer, 2016). Drug courts allow offenders to “attain important skills/ideas, improve relationships with family and children, a general educational development certificate, a driver’s license, and/or gainful employment” (Messer, 2016). Researcher Shaffer studied over “80 drug courts and found recidivism rates of 46% for those who participated in drug court programming”…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Crime In Prison

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages

    However, although crime has decreased, drug use has not decreased, and imprisonment rates are growing more drastic. Between 1993 and 1996, serious crime decreased by 5% and adult arrests increased by 12%, but adult arrests for serious crime only increased by 3%; in contrast, arrests for less serious crimes, like drug possession, grew by 14% (Cunniff 9). Yet despite the lack of impact of anti-drug programs, the government continues to take the same approach. Even despite the increase in prison populations, there are little to no regulations of prison populations (Schlanger 199). Clearly, the federal government must discontinue the emphasis on drug sentences and begin to put more effort into decreasing prison populations.…

    • 1269 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “In 2005 four out of five drug arrests were for possession of minor drugs, and one out of five were for actual sales… [with] most people in state prison for drug offenses having no history of violence or significant selling activity” (Alexander, p. 60). If the prison system was designed to keep out the most dangerous and worst kind of people behind bars, it shouldn’t be a fact that the majority of those in jail are nonviolent offenders of…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug Court Recidivism

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Drug Court Effectiveness and Recidivism of Participants According to the results from the 2013 Arrestee Drug Abuse Monitoring II (ADAM II) survey (2014), between two-thirds and three-quarters of all adults males arrested were at risk for drug dependence; as few as one-quarter had sought any type of treatment for drug or alcohol use. (p. xiv). Traditionally, the criminal justice system focused on enforcement and incarceration to reduce drug-related crime, but recidivism has remained high.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The correctional system suffers from a higher recidivism rate for multiple reasons. The main reason for the high recidivism rates is that thereare few re-entry services provided to each person after they are released fromprison or on parole. Communities need to focus on factors such as the risk ofbeing homeless, mental health services, substance abuse programs, health carecoverage, educational support, and family services. Most re-entry programs donot have the money to focus on all of these factors before releasing offendersback into the community. Another reason why it is so difficult for offenders tore-enter society after being in prison is their inability to become employed.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When thinking about prison, most criminologists also consider recidivism rates. Recidivism rates refers to the re-entry of offenders, some argue that recidivism rates simply mean “the percent who fail” (Wilson, 1996, p. 171). Typically, once a person enters the United States Criminal Justice System for the first time, it is not their last, partly due to the fact that they lack constructive and adaptive skills to function effectively in the community (Piotrowski, 2012, p.683). Offenders usually re-offend after they are released from supervision for their prior offense. It is important to know that some type of prison-based rehabilitation programs are in effect in most institutions around the country, but only about half of the incarcerated…

    • 1096 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Of the three models discussed in the project instruction, the most logical for the chosen institute would be the reintegration model. This is important since the purpose of prison is to punish and improve. Through understanding this definition, it would make sense to encourage a prisoner’s success once the punishment is over, and they are met with question, “What now?” Without prepping them for this change, the impact of the punishment is lessened and adds to both the individual’s and public’s problems. By reintegrating them, there is a chance to steer their life for the better of the individual, the family, and the general public.…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Drug court participants who had more status hearings and received more praise from the judge later reported committing fewer crimes and using drugs less often than those with less contact and praise (Anonymous). This is in line with low self-esteem being one of the reasons that people do drugs in the first place (Reasoner, N.D.) In the maddening frenzy of drugs being on every corner, in every closet, in every automobile, and everywhere one seems to turn, we need not forget that, although a drug user has a stigma attached, every individual has a story. Everyone is worth saving, but not everyone will be. They don’t need to be treated like cattle without a face or name. They are human and were probably very different before drugs, which mean they respond to kindness.…

    • 3440 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (Ferranti, S., n.d.) Becoming drug free is tough when there isn’t a compassionate network of people to support them; therefore it is important for prisoners to be introduced to these programs while incarcerated. An experiment was conducted in Sweden that was published in the Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology & Crime Prevention, a peer-reviewed journal of scientific work, where 741 prisoners were compared to prisoners with the same statistical likelihood of reoffending. The results showed that the prisoners who received drug treatment prior to their release show a significantly lower amount of re-offense than the group who did not. (Holmberg, S., & Öberg, J., 2012)…

    • 1371 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays