In other words, there would be a set amount that SNAP benefit paid toward unhealthy food choices. With this option, the SNAP benefit would pay 100% of a healthy food choice while it may pay a smaller portion of the cost of an unhealthy food choice. This would leave the participant to pay the remainder of the cost associated with the unhealthy food choice. There have been recommendations that the SNAP program should set price ceilings for food groups. For example, $40 available for spending on green leafy vegetables and $10 of the total benefit available for snack items. Regardless of how this is administered, it has the potential to encourage those who use the SNAP benefit to make healthier food choices. If a person is truly economically challenged and in need of food, they would make wiser choices for healthier foods to simply prevent unnecessary
In other words, there would be a set amount that SNAP benefit paid toward unhealthy food choices. With this option, the SNAP benefit would pay 100% of a healthy food choice while it may pay a smaller portion of the cost of an unhealthy food choice. This would leave the participant to pay the remainder of the cost associated with the unhealthy food choice. There have been recommendations that the SNAP program should set price ceilings for food groups. For example, $40 available for spending on green leafy vegetables and $10 of the total benefit available for snack items. Regardless of how this is administered, it has the potential to encourage those who use the SNAP benefit to make healthier food choices. If a person is truly economically challenged and in need of food, they would make wiser choices for healthier foods to simply prevent unnecessary