Nuclear Energy Effects

Superior Essays
Nuclear power can have very damaging effects to people and to the environment. However, in order to keep funding this alternate source of energy, what needs to be changed? Nuclear energy has a very high potential to generate massive amounts of power that can be provided to communities. It generates so much energy, that sometimes these community power plants can have dangerous meltdowns. These meltdowns, can cause catastrophic malfunctions damage to people and the environment. Aside from the meltdowns, the disposal of the nuclear waste, the byproduct from the power plants, is very harmful to everything around it. The operation and management of nuclear energy must be improved, and in a way that is safer to the environment. Nuclear power is …show more content…
According to When Technology Fails Chernobyl Accident, “two mammoth explosions blew apart Unit #4 of the Chernobyl nuclear power plant near Pripyat in the Ukrainian republic of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR), what is now the independent country of Ukraine.” The explosions had many damaging effects to all around it. The crew that had been working at the unit at the time with the reactor was killed almost instantly, and anyone within the general vicinity of the area was seriously injured. The source of error in this catastrophe was the experimentation the crew of the power plant was conducting. In order to prevent this type of event from happening again, people need to look back on what happened. In this case, as aforementioned previously, two explosions had occurred from unsupervised experimentations. If they had a stricter policy on what can be allowed during operation, and if they had a more developed response system in case of a potential meltdown, the event of the Chernobyl accident may have never occurred. If the methods of operation were safer, and had less room for error, then nuclear power plants would not be seen as so dangerous and it would give people a better chance to benefit from nuclear …show more content…
One of the most dangerous parts of the power plant is the core from where the reactions occur. In the core, nuclear rods produce a vast amount of heat. Since the nuclear rods are very radioactive, they are highly dangerous to the human person. In the event that there is a nuclear meltdown, radiation is released into the atmosphere. The aftermath of a meltdown can be very destructive to the environment around it. The nuclear radiation that is sent into the atmosphere does not usually leave for a considerable amount of time. In order to improve upon the environment, the companies need to have a better, more preventable way to stop meltdowns. In the event of a nuclear meltdown the companies need a way to at the very least get the situation under control, and in a way “dampen” the overall effect. In order to overall prevent accidents from human error, is to have stricter procedures and policies. The cooling complexes of these nuclear power plants are already complex, but they could be improved. They need to have a system for coolant to be running through the core even when a meltdown is starting to occur. The main reason as to why accidents happen inside of the core is due to coolant not being ran through it, thus it causes it to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Chernobyl disaster (1986) was probably the worst possible accident in a nuclear power plant. It was the biggest catastrophe ever happened since the beginning of operating nuclear power stations. It started by a total meltdown of the reactor core. The explosion and the consequent reactor fire, burning for 10 days, resulted in a vast emission of radioactive material, early deaths of 31 persons and adverse consequences for the public and the environment [198]. This Chernobyl disaster provided many invaluable lessons.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The TMI engineers had different goals compared to the A-bomb creators that focused more on money rather than science. Unlike the A-bomb engineers, unethical decisions were made like not addressing design flaws in prove in similar designs, down to the lack of communication with the surrounding community about the meltdown. Had they been guided by an ethical framework like utilitarianism the issue of the faulty safety valves would have been addressed since actions are only right if they do no harm to others. A pragmatist would also agree that the faulty valve should be addressed given eleven previous nuclear plants had the same issue . Addressing the faults in design would have prevented a meltdown that dropped the number of Americans who support nuclear-power plants from 70 percent to 40 percent .…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This paper consist of the cons/disadvantages of using nuclear power as an energy source. Nuclear energy is today generated in designated plants called nuclear reactors. Nuclear power is sourced from the heat collected from a regulated nuclear fission chain reaction, using either plutonium or uranium for the reaction. The nuclear fission reaction constitutes an element like plutonium or uranium being subjected to extreme pressures until its neutrons split. The splitting then produces a fission of the large atoms to create new and smaller neutrons and atoms as the byproducts of the reaction as well as radiation.…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the United States it is very hard to have a poorly made Nuclear Power Plant because there are inspectors the have to check the plant every so often but in places like Japan they may not necessarily have that. When a disaster accuses with a Nuclear Power Plant it is going to be bad (usually). Nuclear Power Plants have multiple safeties making sure nothing will destroy it but in 2011 a Nuclear Power Plant was hit by a tsunami and exploded and all of the safeties failed. This is due to poor upkeep and things like that. The first nuclear power plant was opened in…

    • 1303 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are many opinions on nuclear power. Opponents say that nuclear power reactors release radiation in the air, causing a lot of danger, but supporters say it produces less pollution. I think Nuclear power shouldn't be passed in the United States because it takes a long time, nuclear accidents , and it attracts terrorist. Nuclear power uses fission to make electricity.fission is the splitting of a heavy nucleus into two lighter nuclei. Fission generates heat to produce steam, then it’s used by a turbine generator to make electricity.(Duke 2016)…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The accident on Three Mile Island led to developments of safety precautions that should have been employed in Chernobyl. The accident in Chernobyl showed the same trends as the Three Mile Island incident. Fukushima’s incident led new speculation on plant safety and emergency measures. The lack of development morphs the transparency in information presented regarding safety of plant design with similar trends…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time of the earthquake, there were 11 nuclear reactors operating in the region. When the earthquake struck, all 11 shut down automatically and available power was used to run the cooling pumps at most of the units which achieved cold shutdown in a few days. Unfortunately, a major accident happened at Tepco’s Fukushima Daiichi…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One reason why nuclear power plants are dangerous is because of the possibility of a melt down. When uranium, the energy source in nuclear power plants, gets too hot in can melt. In addition, large hydrogen bubbles can also form in the core of reactors. If they come in contact with oxygen, it can explode also causing a meltdown. In March of 1979, the Three Mile Island nuclear plant near Middletown, PA, experienced both of these faults.…

    • 531 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Nuclear Option good or not for humans In this article, Will Ripley, Junko Ogura and James Griffiths discuss the Fukushima: Five years after Japan 's worst nuclear disaster with three parts. As we know on March 11, 2011, an earthquake and tsunami of unprecedented led to major problems at the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant. Operating reactors shut down automatically, with control rods inserting into the reactor cores. A 14meter high tsunami triggered by the earthquake disabled all AC power to Units 1, 2, and 3 of the Power Plant, and carried off fuel tanks for emergency diesel generators.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Who is holding the bomb? As one of the greatest invention in human history, nuclear technology were provided human a new source of energy supply, but it comes up with a lot of controversies whether the benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages or not. Although the advancing of nuclear technology has been provided us a relatively clean and virtually unlimited fuel resources, it comes up with a huge threat which will cause a severe damage to mankind and the environment. First of all, nuclear fuel is extremely dangerous.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “a lack of oversight and emergency initiative can be deadly.” (Beech). Human errors are not flawless enough to control nuclear power. According to Beech, many Fukushima residents committed suicides because of the stress, that did not get alleviate from the Japan government. Nuclear accidents have a big…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Fukushima accident in Japan in 2013. Based on World Nuclear Association website, following a major earthquake, a 15-metre tsunami disabled the power supply and cooling of three Fukushima Daiichi reactors (“Fukushima Accident”). The accident was rated 7 on the INES scale which due to high radioactive releases over days 4 to 6. There was also a report of contaminated water around the area. From this example alone, the development of nuclear energy and its impact has several stakeholder.…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Power In America

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite competition from cheap natural gas and tax-payer supported wind and solar energy, nuclear power has no equal. Among sources of electric-power generation, it plays a crucial role against the battle to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Nuclear power is one of the few technologies that can quickly combat climate change. This can cut down Global Warming by being very efficient, it can be very safe, nuclear power reduces the need for fossil fuels, and this power can be used constantly other than wind or solar energy which requires a breeze or the sun to be out. Due to ever increasing of pollution, Global Warming is impacting everyone, and nuclear power is the only way to stop it.…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Chernobyl Essay

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The city of Chernobyl is located in northern Kiev Oblast, in modern day Ukraine, where it was previously under the Soviet Union control. In the city is a nuclear power plant built and designed by the Soviets. It was an RBMK-1000 model nuclear reactor, which used “enriched U-235 uranium fuel to heat water creating steam that drives the reactors’ turbines and generate electricity” (http://www.livescience.com/39961-chernobyl.html). The plant had 4 reactors with graphite moderators, which slows down the release of neutron during fission. Essentially, used to maintain the chain reaction.…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays