Analysis Of Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima By William Tucker

Decent Essays
The article “Why I Still Support Nuclear Power, Even After Fukushima” by William Tucker portrays that all energy technologies have risks and that the world needs to use nuclear technology to help maintain the standard of living. For example, the natural gas explosion in Cleveland, the coal mining in china, and the hydroelectric dam collapse in Japan are all examples of technology accidents. Tucker implies that nuclear power does have some risks but it is still one of the best sources of energy. Uranium fuel rods cam sit in a reactor core for up to five years and power a city close to the size of San Francisco. Nuclear reactors can last quite a long time before they need to be refilled and can supply to a big chunk of the world with very little

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people who live in Richmond don’t want to agree on constructing a nuclear power plant because of they are frightened that it’s going to explode and cause a lot of damage. In March 1979, an accident occur in The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant in Pennsylvania which allowed a small leakage of radiation surround the atmosphere. Many people would fear that it can harm their health, but in Document A it states that “the leak had no demonstrable effect on the health of anyone at the plant or in the surrounding area.” In other words, the small leakage didn't put anyones health and the environments’ in danger. By this, we know that building a nuclear power has more pros than cons, and that there is nothing to worry about.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Americans, and the rest of the world, should switch to nuclear power because it produces great amounts of energy with little to no waste, is constantly available and reusable, and nuclear energy is safe. Nuclear energy provides great amounts of energy with very little amounts of nuclear material. In the documentary “Pandora’s Promise” Leonard Koch(died on the fifteenth of may in 2015) said that “one pound of uranium, which is about the size of my fingertip, would produce the same amount of energy as five thousand barrels of oil.” Now in one forty-two gallon barrel of oil there is five point eight million btu(british thermal units), one btu would raise a pot of water one degree. Multiply five point eight million by five thousand, and you get…

    • 683 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The failure to address the safety mechanism flaws and properly train technicians have made citizen believe that nuclear power is the most dangerous although “statistics show that nuclear power has killed by far the fewest number of per terawatt hour of any type of power”…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, he is inaccurate because in “The Fatal Flaws of Nuclear Power”, it discusses about the additional expenses of nuclear power since “Other aspects of nuclear power, such as the pollution from uranium mining, risks from nuclear weapons proliferation, dangers of reactor accidents, and the legacy of radioactive waste, are further hidden costs.” This demonstrates that constructing a nuclear reactor is highly priced, along with numerous other requirements that necessitate funds. Additionally, nuclear power generates harmful risks towards humans. Based on…

    • 564 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Annotated Bibliography Topic: Nuclear Energy Thesis: While nuclear energy has many benefits, the negative implications must be considered. " Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know. "…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    With its cheap cost to produce and provide electricity and it’s flawless safety record, the benefits of nuclear power definitely outweigh its risks. Secondly looking at the effects of nuclear power on the environment, nuclear power is cleaner than many forms of energy. According to ehow.com, the two main byproducts of generating nuclear power are water and radioactive waste used as fuel for the reactors. while this may sound bad, waste storage is not a huge issue. Much of the nuclear waste is able to be recycled into more fuel products, reducing the amount of waste actually needing…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy Proposal

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages

    All sources except for “Thorium”, Ian Schultz’s article and the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency conclude that nuclear energy is reliable. The sources that do not state this deal with other aspects concerning nuclear energy such as cost and fuel. Another trend is the low cost of nuclear energy after the initial build of the plant, which is concluded by every source, but “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, “Unmatched Reliability” and “CO2 emission of electricity from nuclear power stations”. Finally, all sources but “Thorium”, the Nuclear Energy Agency and the International Atomic Energy Agency, Ian Schultz’s report, “Unmatched Reliability” and “Murkowski: Nuclear Energy Crucial to Future of U.S. Energy Policy”, discuss the low pollution of nuclear energy which is the last key point of my essay. • All of the sources are credible sources, because they are relevant, produced recently and are either organizations, education sites or databases.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    magnitude 9.0 earthquake and tsunami with waves peaking at 17 meters hit Japan on March 11, 2011. Three of the reactors at Fukushima overheated because the cooling systems failed after a tsunami flooded the power station and disabled the reactor cooling system which causing core meltdowns and make reactors impossible to restart . This was compounded by hydrogen gas explosions and released large amounts of radioactive material into the air, and the releases continue to this day. The accident also released tons of radioactive water into the Pacific Ocean. Fukushima accident triggered a 30-km evacuation zone surrounding the plant and can only be entered under government supervision.…

    • 524 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Farther into book Ferguson gives background information on nuclear energy and the health risks that can develop from it. People exposed to too much ionizing radiation over long periods of time are at a higher risk for developing cancer; however, the human body can fight off ionizing radiation in low dosages, so containing the amount of…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    This essay will explore the social perception of nuclear energy after Chernobyl. Focusing on affected human health in the contemporary context attempting to argue the need of concealing nuclear related information benefitting modernity. Explored by using architectural, scientific, and theoretical texts from, Le Corbusier, “Colin Rowe and Robert Slutzky, Jacques-Alain Miller and Richard Miller, Eve Blau, IAEA, WHO, and UNSCEAR. We analyze transparency in information represented by the media and the perception of the nuclear industry after the failure of the Chernobyl plant affecting human health. Perception of nuclear energy is revised by the results of Chernobyl’s effects on human health.…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Regardless of the various definitions of renewable energy, nuclear energy meets every reasonable criterion for sustainability, which is the primary concern of countries. The United States should use nuclear energy for three primary reasons: first, it produces more cost effective energy than any other non-renewable resource. Second there is no release of greenhouse gasses which contribute to global warming, and finally nuclear energy is the most reliable source of power in the world today. Nuclear power produces electricity that is less expensive than coal and natural gas while providing more energy for use. The Energy Informative Organization supports this claim when the author states, “Generating electricity in nuclear reactors is cheaper…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Cost Essay

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear power comprises 20% of the world’s energy production. No other form of energy production runs the risk of being taken over by terrorists, or exploding and killing millions of people within a 50 mile radius (Nuclear Power Plants). The United States has 121 government sanctioned nuclear energy power plants in its borders that each cost extreme amounts to build and run. With the U.S. being nearly twenty trillion dollars in debt, it would be wise to stop all further development of nuclear energy.…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Energy In Europe

    • 1019 Words
    • 4 Pages

    According to Shrader-Frechette (2011 p80), nuclear power plants can only operate for an average of 70% of the time due to maintenance schedule and breakdowns. Regular maintenance needs and breakdowns implies that nuclear energy cannot generate the full capacity, which results in the addition of cost for the users. Nuclear energy also cannot compete with other forms of renewable energy. Andrianov et al (2015 p1004) write that nuclear energy is not competitive enough with other energy sources in terms of efficiency such that its cost exceeds its benefits for the users. The benefits of nuclear energy such as low carbon emissions do not balance with the cost.…

    • 1019 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays