Nuclear Power Argument Essay

Superior Essays
“The release of atom power has changed everything except our way of thinking the solution to this problem lies in the heart of mankind. If only I had known, I should have become a watchmaker” (Einstein, 1945). Einstein thinks that Nuclear energy knowledge are able to change the world for better than before because it can produce the energy more easily. Also, he know that nuclear energy knowledge has trouble aspects that may people exploit it to hurt other people. Nevertheless, what distinguishes is production of nuclear energy is that it doesn’t need expensive materials or look for particular area to find some sources that help to product energy as oil or coal. Also, using nuclear energy has very a few environmental problems compared with …show more content…
The environmental effects of nuclear power are relatively light compared to those” (Maehlum, 2013, para5). Which means nuclear energy is less energy may be harmful the climate although the world is faced global warming by energy pollution. However, worst aspects that impedes production of nuclear energy to spread everywhere is several harmful effects that may destroy the life. Indeed, nuclear accidents and leaking radiations are worst issues that are involved in countries. The world has seen nuclear accidents and spread of nuclear radiation that have killed a lot of people who work on nuclear plants or live around plants. That happens mostly because the workers mistakes and the nuclear plants which control radiations to release energy steadily have their own defects. The Chernobyl nuclear energy plant accident was happening at 1986 in Ukraine was the only accident in the history of nuclear energy to cause fatalities from radiation. That was due to defects it is evident in the design of nuclear reactors (NEI, …show more content…
Disposal of Nuclear waste is most important part of nuclear energy generation that can effect the hazardous materials on animals and plant life. (Ruckelshaus, 2009). Because disposal of nuclear waste is extremely dangerous, scientists suggest a lot of solutions but at the end was a failed idea such as underground burial. That underground burial lead to might spreading of radiation in future because nuclear waste will remain radioactive for hundreds of years. At 1982 United states federal law proposed idea that using the space shuttle as a garbage disposal vehicle, but shuttle flights not became enough or frequent enough and another problem is very expensive to carry to the wide space (Claiborne, 2004). That if this idea was succeed and did not have other consequences, it would have a huge spread of nuclear energy because the space is very wide and can sand space shuttle with nuclear waste without problems. Moreover, Some of nuclear plants try to do the waste is well sealed inside huge drums of steel or underground burial as mentioned previously, sometimes accidents are occurring because of human mistakes such as leaking hazardous materials that would affect the plants and animals life. In Chernobyl explosion, there are obvious adverse effects on red forest that close to the explosion site and animals that there were. Due to exposure to radiation, it

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    As research continues, newer and better technologies are invented. This new technology is being used in almost all aspects of life, from day-to-day life, research, military, medical and many other fields. One such technology is the development of nuclear power. Nuclear energy is “the energy held in the nucleus of an atom; it can be obtained through two types of reactions – fission and fusion”1. Recently nuclear energy has become more important because of its various uses and applications, its effects on the environment, and based on the church’s opinions and the opinions of the military and governments, nuclear energy is an important tool that humans should continue to research and develop, but only its non-violent applications.…

    • 1895 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It's evident that temperature is rising which as a result causes us to experience a lot of abnormal climate changes worldwide. The cause of this increase of temperature is the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect is constructed by water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane and ozone. The greenhouse effect is when the gasses trap the sunlight, not making them bounce back to space, which creates the atmosphere to warm, thus making Earth hotter. What’s responsible for realising a large amount of carbon dioxide is the burning of fossils fuels.…

    • 476 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a passage that lays out all of the main components of Nuclear energy. It is filled with statistics and real world examples, including visual aids. The major purpose of this text is to inform the reader that nuclear power is in fact a beneficial form of energy. Three images on page 18 show nuclear power in action.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chernobyl disaster (1986) was probably the worst possible accident in a nuclear power plant. It was the biggest catastrophe ever happened since the beginning of operating nuclear power stations. It started by a total meltdown of the reactor core. The explosion and the consequent reactor fire, burning for 10 days, resulted in a vast emission of radioactive material, early deaths of 31 persons and adverse consequences for the public and the environment [198]. This Chernobyl disaster provided many invaluable lessons.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear energy should not be a resource after what happened in Japan on 11 march 2011. That day a Nuclear power plantation has been destroyed by an earthquake in Japan. It causes radiation all around Japan and many people died. It doesn't matter if the disaster happened on Japan just because Japan is known for tsunami, earthquake, storm surge, and floods. This global warming situation is out of control for everybody so this can happen anywhere and if any natural causes hit any nuclear power plant it's going to be really bad for everybody like what happen to the nuclear power plant called the Fukushima crisis.…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some experts say that nuclear power is a good idea because it does not harm the environment in ways that other power sources do. According to Bradford A. Peter and Mark Lynas, authors for the Wall State Journal, nuclear energy produces a miniscule amount of greenhouse gases, while fossil fuels produce…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nuclear power is a better benefit to atmosphere and the world itself than coal. Nuclear power releases less greenhouse gases than coal making it environmentally friendly. For this reason we are better off choosing nuclear power rather than coal. Coal power plants are one of the biggest contributors to global warming. On the other hand nuclear power plants release little to no harmful gasses into the atmosphere.…

    • 157 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although , nuclear power is bad it is also accounts for 20% of our country’s electricity. This…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The most debated topic of nuclear power is the question: “Is nuclear power ethical?”. There are a number of areas to consider when looking at this. First one must must look at the risk to cost ratio and see if the benefits of nuclear power outweigh the risks. Secondly one must must look briefly at the environmentally effects caused by the generation of nuclear power. Lastly one must must look at the potential effects on future generations.…

    • 1266 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad.…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    History and Controversy of Nuclear Power The creation of nuclear energy has changed the world but, it has affected someone people a little bit closer. Lindsey Schiller, a registered nurse, and her husband and two children have been living next to a nuclear power plant almost a decade now. Currently neighboring the Limerick Generating Station nuclear energy facility in Pottstown, Schiller jokingly states “We kid around when we get really big flowers ...…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Fukushima Catastrophe

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The fukushima catastrophe that occured in 2001 demonstrated what happens when a nuclear power plant's saftey system fails. Along with this, the U.S. nuclear industry responded by saying that that will not happen here, but it can and it will eventually. Even if a meltdown doesn't occur, the waste the nuclear power plants produce do some damage to our enviroment. Every waste dump in the U.S. leaks radiation that can travel through the air,ground water, and agricultural consumption which can lead to human ingestion. This waste has no dispoal becasue the only way to dispose of the waste is to manage it for thousands of years until it decays.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Every year our planet comes into contact with multiple large scale pollution disasters which continue to lead us to our inevitable demise if we don’t change something. Right now, our lives are fueled mostly by Coal, and Oil which create large disasters. Pollutants from these disasters flood into our oceans killing millions of fish, and other sea creatures. The pollutants also get into our air which cause smog in many cities, which can lead to death amongst thousands of small children. The time is now to switch to an alternate source of electricity that is required to save our planet.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chernobyl disaster in 1986 was one of the worst nuclear accidents in history. Many of the harmful effects can still be seen today, almost 30 years after the incident. The main cause of the accident was a flaw in the reactor 's design, which resulted in an explosion releasing large quantities of radioactive particles into the atmosphere. You may think that with an increase in safety measures and more careful attention to building and design that we can avoid further tragedies, but unfortunately not all disaster is caused by human neglect. The major tsunami that took place in Japan in 2011 led to equipment failures and in turn caused three meltdowns at the Fukushima Power Plant, resulting in the release of radioactive material.…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays