Persuasive Essay Against Nuclear Energy

Decent Essays
Nuclear energy should not be a resource after what happened in Japan on 11 march 2011. That day a Nuclear power plantation has been destroyed by an earthquake in Japan. It causes radiation all around Japan and many people died. It doesn't matter if the disaster happened on Japan just because Japan is known for tsunami, earthquake, storm surge, and floods.This global warming situation is out of control for everybody so this can happen anywhere and if any natural causes hit any nuclear power plant it's going to be really bad for everybody like what happen to the nuclear power plant called the Fukushima crisis. Nuclear energy is not good for the world. The risk of accidents causing acute exposure to radiation will always remain. After the Fukushima disaster, it showed the world that nuclear power is unsafe. The citizens in Japan near by the Fukushima Nuclear Power plant was exposed to radiation and died less than an hour. The question is why is …show more content…
Government or Nuclear officials choose to ignore to dismiss the possibility of a Fukushima accident. Governments were interested in developing nuclear power plants, but they have been too preoccupied with social and political issues about their nuclear plans. Iran says they need nuclear power for their energy security. And Europe’s diplomatic try to convince it otherwise and that it would be safer and could be much easier that civilian nuclear energy is unnecessary.
And if Europe really do want a nuclear free world, then they have to commit to abandoning on nuclear technology. Even now Iran is developing a program that analyzes a covert nuclear weapon capability. In response to the Fukushima nuclear accident the government decided to take discuss on a term called National Discussion. There was a Deliberative Polling that had been introduced to Japan policy level. This DP included 285 patients across japan, asking them to deliberate on three nuclear plan

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It began with having a lot going on that has involved weapons made out of nuclear fission and probably makes you think if you think if nuclear fission has harmed society. There many examples what good it’s done for us and many harm that it caused. It has allowed us to use it for greater things but also taken advantage of by using it for weapons of destruction. They’ve already used one on people already and killed many. That is not the way using nuclear fission, they use it for threats, power, and their own purposes.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Why the World May Turn to Nuclear Power” is a statistically based article. Consequently, logos appear throughout the passage. Figure 1, located on the top right corner of page 19, shows the percentages of nuclear power used for 17 different countries in the years of 1998 and 2008. According to the table, Lithuania was the nuclear energy leader in 2008 with 77.2% and France in 2008 with 76.2%. The article also predicts what the future will bring of nuclear power.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Rhetorical Analysis of “Abandoning Nuclear Power Would Threaten Economic Security Worldwide” In the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant in March 2011, interest in the nuclear energy debate has been renewed not only in Japan, but also globally. Proponents of nuclear energy claim that it is affordable while opponents cite safety concerns. Jack Spencer’s article “Abandoning Nuclear Power Would Threaten Economic Security Worldwide” was published in 2013 in Opposing Viewpoints. In this article, Spencer claims that Japan should stay focused on nuclear energy to minimize its reliance on imports of natural gas, coal, and oil.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Meanwhile, nuclear proliferation risks remain a prohibitive concern for many experts—even those who believe that nuclear energy can play a significant role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. So in my opinion we need to have a long-term plan for nuclear waste. If we do not have it, we should not use of nuclear energy…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In recent decades the operators at Sellafield has tossed more than 500 kg of plutonium into the sea through pipelines that are only visible from the air and the operators of these companies argue this is land-based disposal and it has been approved by the governing authorities. What does the nuclear industry gain from this? Well that is easy, the waste pipelines are hidden from public eye so no more negative press, after all if we cannot see it, it isn’t really there. The unethical practice does stop there.…

    • 982 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the world grows more populated and people become more immersed in their modern lives power-generation has become the leading cause of air pollution, and the biggest contributing factor to global warming in the US. Finding a source of clean renewable energy at the lowest cost and lowest impact on the environment has become a very complex mission. Not only is the race for a renewable energy source dire to help save the planet, our current major power source, Coal is slowly but surely running out. As scientists look into new forms of power, Nuclear Energy has some aspects that are very alluring but consequences that I believe are far too great. “The Fukushima disaster in March 2011, and the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 verify the danger that comes with Nuclear Reactors.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The documentary that was first shown in 2013 and is approximately 83 minutes long, does an excellent job of creating a debate about the perception of nuclear energy in challenging global climate change during the 21st century. This documentary film's main argument is that nuclear power, yet contradicted by many environmentalists, is a relatively safe and harmless source of energy if compared to other energy sources and can counteract…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thesis: Our energy comes predominantly from fossil fuels because of it’s supposed inexpensiveness. However, the cost of fossil fuels in terms of human lives is often ignored. Nuclear power, on the other hand, is a much safer alternative because it results in fewer deaths per unit of energy produced than coal and natural gas. By comparing their outputs in terms of energy produced per unit of fuel consumed, and comparing that with the amount of byproducts produced as well as the amount of deaths associated with both energy sources we can analyse their relative harmfulness.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident is one of the most significant nuclear plant incidents to occur on United States soil. In this lesson, you will learn about the hopes for nuclear energy, and how the accident reinforced its risks. You will also learn about what has been done since the accident to make sure that nuclear plants are as safe as possible. !!! Introduction to the Three Mile Island Nuclear Accident…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people agree and disagree that nuclear power is the solution to all of our problems, but is it really safe? In the United States there are two different types of nuclear reactors, one is called a…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Burgess said “Nuclear power will help provide the electricity that our growing economy needs without increasing emissions. This is truly an environmentally responsible source of energy”. That is one of the main reason this source of energy is used by most countries. It has the power of generating electricity that is able to meet industrial and city needs. Also is considered as one of the most environmentally friendly source of energy, as it produces fewer greenhouse gas emissions during the production of electricity as compared to sources like coal power plants.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Nuclear Power Benefits

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages

    To even to begin to help “worldwide emissions (need to be reduced) by 60 to 80 percent before 2050” (Claussen). Some people are not willing to take the time and the money to be able to make the change necessary for this world to continue on in a healthy state. These people believe that if a change is needed, it needs to be made now, rather than later. Since the nuclear option takes too much time, these people feel it is not the best option, and others should be considered to benefit the future. Although it will take time, I believe that building the nuclear power plants will benefit the future.…

    • 1839 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Effects

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Aside from the meltdowns, the disposal of the nuclear waste, the byproduct from the power plants, is very harmful to everything around it. The operation and management of nuclear energy must be improved, and in a way that is safer to the environment. Nuclear power is…

    • 2413 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Meltdowns

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages

    31 countries involved in the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), formed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), came together to evaluate and improve nuclear safety after the dangerous accident at Fukushima. The OECD reviewed and improved standard procedures during rare and extreme external and internal hazards, and how to deal with them, especially if multiple hazards appear at once (“The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant,” 2013). Immediately following the Fukushima meltdown, Germany took eight of its oldest reactors offline, and furthermore planned on a phase-out of all remaining reactors by 2022 (Kottasova, 2014). Switzerland created a similar plan, describing a phase-out of its nuclear energy by 2034 (Kottasova, 2014). Other countries, such as the U.S.A and France, remain consistent with their nuclear reactors, choosing to keep all the reactors they have running (Kottasova,…

    • 1312 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The report relays a compilation of several polls and studies taken across multiple European nations on the general popular opinion on nuclear power. The authors, who are nuclear analysts for the agency, did research into numerous aspects regarding public opinion, including attitudes towards nuclear power in general, the perceived benefits or drawbacks from nuclear energy according to the public, and their concerns when it came to events like meltdowns and terrorism. The results of their studies is that “nuclear power is still a contentious issue with respect to public opinion” (Eng, Gordelier, Kovacs 2010). Overall, people are still very skeptical about this type of energy due to meltdowns such as Chernobyl and Three-Mile Island, as well as the threat of terrorism.…

    • 1966 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays