Nuclear Energy Meltdowns

Superior Essays
Nuclear energy has always been known for the dangers associated with it. Radiation, first discovered by Marie and Pierre Curie, are penetrating rays and particles emitted by a radioactive substance. These penetrating rays can damage human cells, making them dangerous to human’s health. After one of the strongest earthquakes in recorded history, a 9.0 magnitude earthquake, hit Japan on March 11th, 2011. It was followed by a tsunami with waves reaching over 40.5 meters. The tsunami caused three major meltdowns in the Fukushima Daiichi Power plant’s nuclear reactors, resulting in radiation to leaking out and threatening to harm nearby civilians. The meltdowns brought attention to the dangers of nuclear energy once again, causing Japan and countries …show more content…
Before the nuclear accident, nuclear energy had been a national priority since 1973, as it was Japan’s only self-sufficient source of energy (“Nuclear Power,” 2015). After the accident, an Energy & Environment Council was set up in July of, introducing the plan of lowering Japan’s nuclear power use to 25 to as little as 0% (“Nuclear Power,” 2015). Enecan, an energy company, proposed a plan that would cut out nuclear energy use by 2040. (“Nuclear Power,” 2015.) All 48 of Japan’s nuclear reactors were taken offline (Kottasova, 2014). Despite the decadence of these plans, Japan relied of nuclear energy, one of the only forms of energy that wasn’t exported from other countries. According to the World Nuclear Association (2015), Japan imports up to 84% of its energy requirements, although the Energy Information Administration (2015) claims that the percent is as high as 99%, as indicated by the graph to the left. Because of the economic instability of importing all of its energy requirements, it’s no surprise that Japan discarded its nebulous plans and returned to nuclear energy. The first nuclear power plant since Fukushima opened back up in November of 2014 (“First Japanese Nuclear Power,” 2014). First Yuichiro Ito, the governor of the town Kagoshima, agreed with the decision to restart two …show more content…
31 countries involved in the Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA), formed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), came together to evaluate and improve nuclear safety after the dangerous accident at Fukushima. The OECD reviewed and improved standard procedures during rare and extreme external and internal hazards, and how to deal with them, especially if multiple hazards appear at once (“The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant,” 2013). Immediately following the Fukushima meltdown, Germany took eight of its oldest reactors offline, and furthermore planned on a phase-out of all remaining reactors by 2022 (Kottasova, 2014). Switzerland created a similar plan, describing a phase-out of its nuclear energy by 2034 (Kottasova, 2014). Other countries, such as the U.S.A and France, remain consistent with their nuclear reactors, choosing to keep all the reactors they have running (Kottasova,

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The primary audience of this article is subscribers to The Futurist magazine. More specifically it is aimed towards the people who are interested in learning more about the future of nuclear power. This group may encompass anyone ranging from a middle-aged garbage man to a high school teenager or even a grandpa looking out for the generations behind him. A person who wants to know more than the media portrays will read this article. The authors focus mainly on the benefits of nuclear power, but they also bring in the counterarguments to strengthen their argument. The reader is most aware of the downfalls of nuclear power because that is what the media conveys to the public. The Three Mile Island incident is brought up more than once in this article and most people are familiar with this because it made worldwide news in 1979. A small portion of the text is a review, but most of it is new information. One piece of information that caught my eye was the portion that discussed the Obama administration: “President Obama eliminated funding… for the state-of-the-art nuclear waste storage facility at Yucca Mountain, Nevada” (Stieglitz and Docksai 17). Nearly all of the statistics were new information. One statistic that stands out in the article is: “at the end of 2007 the world had 439 operating nuclear reactors producing 372 gigawatts of electricity” (Stieglitz and Docksai 20). This article provides readers with enough information in regards to nuclear power…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States still leads the world in the number of nuclear power plants constructed, with one hundred plants in operation. Other countries rely much more heavily on nuclear power. For instance, France gets about 77 percent of its energy from nuclear power. Japan, another country with a high percentage of nuclear power production, recently experienced the Fukushima power plant meltdown after a 2011 earthquake and tsunami. Fukushima reminded us that nuclear power still poses significant risks, even with increased regulation and safety around the…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But no more viewpoint of this article what want to say. So this is not a completion article. I think if it definitely explained The Nuclear Option well or not for humans in the end, it is a perfect article. The article needed one more subject in the end. In general, it suggests important discussion points for the international community on military intervention and the impact of nuclear leak on the displacement of populations. Of course some environmentalists are indeed coming around to nuclear energy. That 's because the nuclear fission process produces virtually no greenhouse gas emissions—unlike the burning of fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas. Nuclear power can provide a reliable, steady stream of electricity that 's not dependent on a shining sun or blowing winds, giving it an advantage—in some people 's minds —over its renewable competitors. But in addition, nuclear fission differs from the burning of fossil fuel in that it produces neither sulfur dioxide nor nitrogen oxides, the pollutants that cause acid rain. In recent years, a number of leaks of radioactive water have stoked environmentalist ire, though local residents were not exposed to dangerous doses of radiation. Meanwhile, nuclear proliferation risks remain a prohibitive concern for many experts—even those who believe that nuclear energy can play a significant role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. So in my opinion we need to have a long-term plan for nuclear waste. If we do not have it, we should not use of nuclear energy…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "Fukushima's Radioactive Water Leak: What You Should Know." National Geographic. National Geographic Society, 14 Apr. 2017. Web. 30 Apr. 2017. This is an educational site with research information and photographed footage. In this questionnaire from National Geographic, Patrick Kiger describes the catastrophe in Japan involving nuclear energy and waste affecting the Pacific Ocean. The article provides practically any question that might arise from the epic news and detailed, truthful explanations to accompany the frequently asked questions. It also includes external links to more information about specific details intertwined with the ordeal in Fukushima such as articles from their own website or others from organizations involved with the nuclear crisis. From this article, I concluded that nuclear energy…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the aftermath of the earthquake and tsunami that devastated Japan’s Fukushima nuclear plant in March 2011, interest in the nuclear energy debate has been renewed not only in Japan, but also globally. Proponents of nuclear energy claim that it is affordable while opponents cite safety concerns. Jack Spencer’s article “Abandoning Nuclear Power Would Threaten Economic Security Worldwide” was published in 2013 in Opposing Viewpoints. In this article, Spencer claims that Japan should stay focused on nuclear energy to minimize its reliance on imports of natural gas, coal, and oil. His audience is Japan’s local authorities who must provide approval before…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Coal Argument Essay

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wind, solar and other renewable energies have been adopted around the world. “Power generated by the wind and sun increased significantly in America last year; but power generated by coal increased more than seven times as much”( Fallows).The amount of energy provided by green technology is still significantly very small compared to energy powered by coal.”Coal provides 40 percent of the world’s electricity”(Nijhuis). Wind and solar need lot of expanding infrastructure before they can replace coal entirely. Nuclear power is one of the popular choice after renewable energies. Nuclear provide a small amount of energy to US. “the technology is very demanding … and political consequences of nuclear accidents are unpredictable” (Chesshire, 247).The radioactive waste is hard to get rid of and decomposed in a long time. For example, the Fukushima nuclear incident, during Japan’s earthquake of 2011, caused many people fear against nuclear power. “Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant—ground zero of the worst atomic meltdown since Chernobyl” (Beech). Nuclear rarely happen but when it does, it is really bad. “a lack of oversight and emergency initiative can be deadly.” (Beech). Human errors are not flawless enough to control nuclear power. According to Beech, many Fukushima residents committed suicides because of the stress, that did not get alleviate from the Japan government. Nuclear accidents have a big…

    • 1088 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In March 2011 an earthquake followed by a tsunami caused the destruction of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant releasing radioactive material into the. In 2011 it was reported that long-lived radioactive cesium had contaminated 11,580 square miles of the land surface of Japan 4,550 of which had a radiation level that exceeded Japan’s allowable exposure rate of 1 millisievert per year .The Japanese government then raised the allowable exposure limit to 20 mSv in order to avoid evacuation of badly irradiated areas.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Nuclear Energy Controversy

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The creation of nuclear energy has changed the world but, it has affected someone people a little bit closer. Lindsey Schiller, a registered nurse, and her husband and two children have been living next to a nuclear power plant almost a decade now. Currently neighboring the Limerick Generating Station nuclear energy facility in Pottstown, Schiller jokingly states “We kid around when we get really big flowers ... we 're under the power plant, and I kid around that I glow." On a more serious note, Schiller did express concernment about the safety of her family after a 9.0 magnitude earthquake and tsunami impacted Japan 's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. For Lindsey Schiller and her family, they…

    • 1506 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nuclear Power In America

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Despite competition from cheap natural gas and tax-payer supported wind and solar energy, nuclear power has no equal. Among sources of electric-power generation, it plays a crucial role against the battle to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Nuclear power is one of the few technologies that can quickly combat climate change. This can cut down Global Warming by being very efficient, it can be very safe, nuclear power reduces the need for fossil fuels, and this power can be used constantly other than wind or solar energy which requires a breeze or the sun to be out. Due to ever increasing of pollution, Global Warming is impacting everyone, and nuclear power is the only way to stop it. Nuclear power has an astounding safety record of only three…

    • 1149 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    First of all, nuclear fuel is extremely dangerous. An inevitable damage would be caused if there are any leakage and malfunction of reaction plant. According to the article (30 Years after Chernobyl's Meltdown), the writer claims that "All of a sudden the people realized that an accident like Chernobyl can happen anywhere and anytime. " The most recent example was Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Fukushima Earthquake

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages

    On March 11, 2011 at 2:46 p.m nearly 22,000 people lost their lives or are lost. A 9.0 magnitude earthquake takes place 231 miles northeast of Tokyo at a depth of 15.2 miles. This earthquake led to a deadly tsunami. It became the fourth-largest earthquake (since 1900).The tsunami caused nuclear accidents, primarily the level 7 meltdowns in the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant complex, and the associated evacuation zones affecting hundreds of thousands of residents. Many electrical generators were taken down, and at least three nuclear reactors suffered explosions due to hydrogen gas that had built up within their outer containment buildings after cooling system failure resulting from the loss of electrical power. Residents near the Fukushima…

    • 123 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Perception of nuclear energy is revised by the results of Chernobyl’s effects on human health. The accident on the 26th of April 1986 triggered…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since natural disasters are causing a tremendous amount of economic damages and fatalities these days, prediction of the time at which natural disasters will occur and preparation for such events has become extremely important. Natural disasters have influenced about 217 million people every year since 1990. (Brett, 2013) These natural disasters not only harm people but also damage the earth ecologically. For example, According to the world nuclear organization, there was a 9.0 scale earthquake in Fukushima, Japan that caused huge tsunami that struck Fukushima nuclear power plants. The leakage of radioactive matters from the nuclear power plants had several negative effects on the Earth. Pollution of ocean water has led to danger of marine…

    • 1210 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The natural disasters coupled with poor engineering designs and decisions resulted in a (Naoto Kan, 2013) “meltdown and melt through” in Reactor Unit 1 from the hydrogen explosions in Unit 1,2 and 3. Unit 4 also suffered a hydrogen explosion (without meltdown). As a result, (Iaea.org, 2011) the disaster received a level 7 INES accident rating from IAEA, the highest in the entire world along with the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. Therefore, it is apparent that the consequence would be on a large scale.…

    • 262 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Chernobyl disaster in 1986 was one of the worst nuclear accidents in history. Many of the harmful effects can still be seen today, almost 30 years after the incident. The main cause of the accident was a flaw in the reactor 's design, which resulted in an explosion releasing large quantities of radioactive particles into the atmosphere. You may think that with an increase in safety measures and more careful attention to building and design that we can avoid further tragedies, but unfortunately not all disaster is caused by human neglect. The major tsunami that took place in Japan in 2011 led to equipment failures and in turn caused three meltdowns at the Fukushima Power Plant, resulting in the release of radioactive material. It was the biggest nuclear disaster since Chernobyl, and nothing could have been done to prevent it, as there is no stopping nature. Then, in any extreme natural event, there is a risk of damage to a plant 's structure or contents, which could easily result in a release of contaminants. Nuclear energy has immense power, and it 's not surprising that that power can be harvested in a detrimental way. There is no remedy for the effects of radiation, which can cause cancer, genetic mutations, and a drastically shorter life expectancy. Given this, nuclear power plants are a prime target for acts of terrorism. A little negligence in security could be devastating for…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics