Rhetorical Analysis Of No Spanking No Time Out No Problems By Khazan

859 Words 4 Pages
Rhetorical strategies to persuade readers
Does every parent need to discipline their children for misbehaving? Even after their punishment, the child may learn, but, not in a positive way. Now, why won’t they learn positively you might ask? Perhaps they didn’t have enough discipline and will need even more? That’s not it; you might just be wrong by disciplining your child. Doing something negative to your child won’t have a positive effect according to an author. The one particular author in the persuasive article “No spanking, No time out, No problems” written by Olga Khazan primarily tries to persuade her readers on a controversial issue to not discipline their children. The uses of rhetorical strategies consecutively connect with her readers
…show more content…
Weishei in his book Pursuing Justice: Traditional and Contemporary Issues in Our Communities and the world”. Weishei suggests “The topics selected for inclusion were chosen to encourage the reader to think about the issue of justice more broadly” ( Weishei 1 ) Kahazan condemns her reasons with Kazadin on why punishment won’t change a child’s behavior with examples of certain situations. For an example, in Khazan’s article, she proposes that “Punishment might make you feel better, but it won’t change the kid’s behavior. This furthermore provides criteria for her article to prove and persuade her audience with personal manipulation why it won’t work. She gives the reader an illustration of their personal self using the issue with emotion to give her leverage on why she is right. The use of this rhetorical strategy was one of many of her basis to persuade her audience and readers. Nevertheless, to bring reason to the issue, why punishment won’t change your kids’ behavior, she uses, actions, thoughts, and dialogue with the parenting expert Alan E …show more content…
According to Herbert Cornelia, he suggests first and second person “With auditory stimulus presentation, first person pronouns could produce conflicting information as during listening they also refer to the speaker’s self.” (4 Cornelia ) In Khazans article she writes her conversation with Kazadin to conflict characterization to the reader personally. She and Kazadin speak using first and second person pronouns throughout her essay, such as “we” occurs 71 different times “you” 111 times and “I” 29 times. The consecutive use of first and second pronouns inflicts the reader with information from her personal perspective through the narrative to persuade. The use of this rhetorical strategy gave her overall main basis to persuade her audience and readers on her beliefs. This nonetheless gives a link to the reader to rethink their beliefs and to be persuaded into following hers. Specifically, her perspective is transitioned into her article for the reader to feel connected and to understand why discipline won’t work on modifying a child’s

Related Documents